<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Will Apple Compete With &#8220;On Demand&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple to Enter Video Rental Market - The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple to Enter Video Rental Market - The Apple Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] How Will Apple Compete With “On Demand”? louisgray.com: How Apple Could Crush Netflix Now louisgray.com: The Apple TV Debate is Upside Down [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Will Apple Compete With “On Demand”? louisgray.com: How Apple Could Crush Netflix Now louisgray.com: The Apple TV Debate is Upside Down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yames</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yames]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Apple buyout of Netflix would be a match made in heaven. Just imagine having the choice of 70K movies on your Apple TV]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Apple buyout of Netflix would be a match made in heaven. Just imagine having the choice of 70K movies on your Apple TV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realize I&#039;m not at all representative of the general public, but I just ditched cable TV service altogether. After doing the math, I realized that given my particular viewing habits, it actually made more sense to watch video online and purchase through iTunes where necessary, rather than shell out for cable service each month. I have Comcast&#039;s broadband service, but not the cable service.

Comcast&#039;s service may work just fine, but you&#039;re assuming that people already have the cable TV package. While that&#039;s true for most people these days, as broadband speeds (gradually) increase, the rationale for keeping cable TV gets weaker.

Also, as others have pointed out, VOD and video purchases are likely more complimentary than in competition with each other. The ability to take a downloaded movie and pop it in my iPod makes it quite valuable to time/place-shifters who don&#039;t like being tethered to the TV. But when you are sitting in front of the TV and have a spur of the moment need see Ben Stiller, VOD may be the way to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize I&#8217;m not at all representative of the general public, but I just ditched cable TV service altogether. After doing the math, I realized that given my particular viewing habits, it actually made more sense to watch video online and purchase through iTunes where necessary, rather than shell out for cable service each month. I have Comcast&#8217;s broadband service, but not the cable service.</p>
<p>Comcast&#8217;s service may work just fine, but you&#8217;re assuming that people already have the cable TV package. While that&#8217;s true for most people these days, as broadband speeds (gradually) increase, the rationale for keeping cable TV gets weaker.</p>
<p>Also, as others have pointed out, VOD and video purchases are likely more complimentary than in competition with each other. The ability to take a downloaded movie and pop it in my iPod makes it quite valuable to time/place-shifters who don&#8217;t like being tethered to the TV. But when you are sitting in front of the TV and have a spur of the moment need see Ben Stiller, VOD may be the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom's blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom's blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 10:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft have done something cool...&lt;/strong&gt;

Check this out Microsoft Surface. A few weeks back I wrote about a research team who were doing some stunning things with touch screens, producing some really intuitive user interfaces. Microsoft seem to be pursuing something similar with their Surface...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft have done something cool&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Check this out Microsoft Surface. A few weeks back I wrote about a research team who were doing some stunning things with touch screens, producing some really intuitive user interfaces. Microsoft seem to be pursuing something similar with their Surface&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky13</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucky13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comcast recently offered a free box with free installation. Prior to this, I had only the most basic of cable service. Movies on Demand has been great...when it actually works. Errors have been frequent, with pauses and freezes and choppy images. I&#039;ve yet to order a pay movie...just the free offerings to this point. If the glitches could be fixed, they&#039;d have a customer.

I&#039;m not sold on the AppleTV concept at this point. It seems too limited and too time consuming. Also, the whole portable video scene doesn&#039;t interest me, whether on an iPod, iPhone...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comcast recently offered a free box with free installation. Prior to this, I had only the most basic of cable service. Movies on Demand has been great&#8230;when it actually works. Errors have been frequent, with pauses and freezes and choppy images. I&#8217;ve yet to order a pay movie&#8230;just the free offerings to this point. If the glitches could be fixed, they&#8217;d have a customer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sold on the AppleTV concept at this point. It seems too limited and too time consuming. Also, the whole portable video scene doesn&#8217;t interest me, whether on an iPod, iPhone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacVortex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacVortex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though I love iTunes I don&#039;t use it for video downloads at all. I want to watch my shows on my 48&quot; Flat-screen without shelling out the money for an AppleTV. My cable provider is offering Movies on demand for a reasonable price. Personally I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll take off as quick as the music downloads. Time will tell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I love iTunes I don&#8217;t use it for video downloads at all. I want to watch my shows on my 48&#8243; Flat-screen without shelling out the money for an AppleTV. My cable provider is offering Movies on demand for a reasonable price. Personally I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll take off as quick as the music downloads. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The interesting thing about the whole media-on-demand phenomenon is that it really is just a precursor to the next generation of media delivery subsystems.

As the Cable-on-demand vs. iTune video downloads, essentially pay content on demand.   It really is just a matter of time now before some company or other offers entire catalogs of movies / shows etc. for one low monthly fee.  At which point, everything is on demand and would no doubt be streamed to my set-top box from whichever service provider I choose to use.

I think as the cable companies move closer and closer to the state at which they are providing unlimited bandwidth to the home, it will become a market for content providers vs. carriage.  This is a similar revolution as is currently taking place in the telephony world today with the VOIP vs. wire services.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing about the whole media-on-demand phenomenon is that it really is just a precursor to the next generation of media delivery subsystems.</p>
<p>As the Cable-on-demand vs. iTune video downloads, essentially pay content on demand.   It really is just a matter of time now before some company or other offers entire catalogs of movies / shows etc. for one low monthly fee.  At which point, everything is on demand and would no doubt be streamed to my set-top box from whichever service provider I choose to use.</p>
<p>I think as the cable companies move closer and closer to the state at which they are providing unlimited bandwidth to the home, it will become a market for content providers vs. carriage.  This is a similar revolution as is currently taking place in the telephony world today with the VOIP vs. wire services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SidinKeyWest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SidinKeyWest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Demand is not portable, I can&#039;t take it with me on business trips. That is the difference in the two delivery models. BTW, I watch most of the movies on my MacBookPro inflight and in the hotel room (when there is time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Demand is not portable, I can&#8217;t take it with me on business trips. That is the difference in the two delivery models. BTW, I watch most of the movies on my MacBookPro inflight and in the hotel room (when there is time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H Dennis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Apple is only going to offer products where it has a significant competitive advantage.

Comcast OnDemand, as you describe it, is the perfect solution for renting movies.  If you see a movie and never want to watch it again, it&#039;s ideal.

Apple&#039;s approach requires that you download the movie before seeing it (or playback will be poor), and then you get to keep it.

These seem to me to be complimentary approaches; sometimes you will want to own something, and other times you&#039;ll want to rent.  Comcast is the cheapest and easiest way to rent, because you don&#039;t need to download the movie; it comes up in full speed and real time.

Of course you could always TIVO your ComCast OnDemand movie and record it that way - although illegal, that sounds like something plenty of people will do in practice, and then it&#039;s the best of both worlds.

That may be the real threat to iTunes.

D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Apple is only going to offer products where it has a significant competitive advantage.</p>
<p>Comcast OnDemand, as you describe it, is the perfect solution for renting movies.  If you see a movie and never want to watch it again, it&#8217;s ideal.</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s approach requires that you download the movie before seeing it (or playback will be poor), and then you get to keep it.</p>
<p>These seem to me to be complimentary approaches; sometimes you will want to own something, and other times you&#8217;ll want to rent.  Comcast is the cheapest and easiest way to rent, because you don&#8217;t need to download the movie; it comes up in full speed and real time.</p>
<p>Of course you could always TIVO your ComCast OnDemand movie and record it that way &#8211; although illegal, that sounds like something plenty of people will do in practice, and then it&#8217;s the best of both worlds.</p>
<p>That may be the real threat to iTunes.</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nosedive51</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nosedive51]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/05/29/how-will-apple-compete-with-on-demand/#comment-321164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention I can&#039;t take OnDemand shows with me on my iPod or soon to own iPhone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention I can&#8217;t take OnDemand shows with me on my iPod or soon to own iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

