<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Got Browser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony M</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shiira was the best of the bunch at rendering Japanese characters , but as the developers are in Japan that doesn&#039;t come as a surprise.

sunrise and iCab are still very young browsers and lack the features of most of the browsers mentioned in the article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shiira was the best of the bunch at rendering Japanese characters , but as the developers are in Japan that doesn&#8217;t come as a surprise.</p>
<p>sunrise and iCab are still very young browsers and lack the features of most of the browsers mentioned in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a PC and Opera user. And I love Opera, and I am going to switch to Mac soon. =] So I was really hoping I wouldn&#039;t have to leave my Opera, I guess not! I love the mouse gestures on Opera, I guess since MightyMouse isn&#039;t that great for some people, the mouse gestures won&#039;t be really working.... =/ But otherwise, glad to know I can stick with my trusty Opera. =D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a PC and Opera user. And I love Opera, and I am going to switch to Mac soon. =] So I was really hoping I wouldn&#8217;t have to leave my Opera, I guess not! I love the mouse gestures on Opera, I guess since MightyMouse isn&#8217;t that great for some people, the mouse gestures won&#8217;t be really working&#8230;. =/ But otherwise, glad to know I can stick with my trusty Opera. =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Woodshed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Woodshed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I just pick my browser based on what I&#039;m doing.  For daily browsing/blogging/etc on my iBook G4 I use Shiira.  I think of it as a slightly more advanced version of Safari.  I also love the drawer for downloads, bookmarks, etc (I&#039;m so sad it&#039;s gone in version 2.0b1).

However, if I&#039;m doing research or opening a ton of tabs and would be devistated if my browser crashed, I use Opera for its session recovery feature.  Yeah I could use Omniweb and save my workspaces, but I really don&#039;t like the tumbnailed tabs.  I&#039;d use it if it had a regular non-thumbnailed tab bar option though like Shiira 2.0b1.

My old iMac G3 is a different story though.  It&#039;s only a 333mhz with 128mb of RAM and I&#039;ve found an optimized version of Camino for G3 processors that works the best.  It may not utilize OSX&#039;s inline spell checker (by far my biggest complaint and yes I know some of the nightlies do), but it gets the job done for simple browsing.

On every other OS I use Opera 100%.  Gotsta love the browser options for OSX.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I just pick my browser based on what I&#8217;m doing.  For daily browsing/blogging/etc on my iBook G4 I use Shiira.  I think of it as a slightly more advanced version of Safari.  I also love the drawer for downloads, bookmarks, etc (I&#8217;m so sad it&#8217;s gone in version 2.0b1).</p>
<p>However, if I&#8217;m doing research or opening a ton of tabs and would be devistated if my browser crashed, I use Opera for its session recovery feature.  Yeah I could use Omniweb and save my workspaces, but I really don&#8217;t like the tumbnailed tabs.  I&#8217;d use it if it had a regular non-thumbnailed tab bar option though like Shiira 2.0b1.</p>
<p>My old iMac G3 is a different story though.  It&#8217;s only a 333mhz with 128mb of RAM and I&#8217;ve found an optimized version of Camino for G3 processors that works the best.  It may not utilize OSX&#8217;s inline spell checker (by far my biggest complaint and yes I know some of the nightlies do), but it gets the job done for simple browsing.</p>
<p>On every other OS I use Opera 100%.  Gotsta love the browser options for OSX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinarut</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinarut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has gotta be one of the best replies I&#039;ve seen in awhile - nice balanced view.  I agree, I want to be able to go into Internet Cafes around the world and just use the stock browser when possible.  The more we depend on plugins, the more we approach the old skool experience of not having the app you love at home on someone else&#039;s computer syndrome.  This is an issue the web browser has addressed quite nicely (and elegantly in many cases) - let&#039;s keep it this way!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has gotta be one of the best replies I&#8217;ve seen in awhile &#8211; nice balanced view.  I agree, I want to be able to go into Internet Cafes around the world and just use the stock browser when possible.  The more we depend on plugins, the more we approach the old skool experience of not having the app you love at home on someone else&#8217;s computer syndrome.  This is an issue the web browser has addressed quite nicely (and elegantly in many cases) &#8211; let&#8217;s keep it this way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Morse</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Morse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Certainly I think we can agree that themes in a browser are very low on a feature priority list.  I can by plugins , but I&#039;m curious what plugins/extensions you think are necessary for a browser.  It seems to be one of your main problems with several of the browsers you reviewed, so what&#039;s missing?

When I was a PC user I primarily used FireFox, for which I only snagged a couple plugins:  Flashblock being the main one I&#039;m missing from Safari.  The other plugins I grabbed for FF were to do things Safari does by default, like open external links in a new tab and force new window links to open in a tab instead.  There are a plethora of plugins available for firefox nowadays, but it seems to me that they just slow the app down if not crash it.

I&#039;m not anti-plugin, I just haven&#039;t seen any that actually help me do work or enjoy the web more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly I think we can agree that themes in a browser are very low on a feature priority list.  I can by plugins , but I&#8217;m curious what plugins/extensions you think are necessary for a browser.  It seems to be one of your main problems with several of the browsers you reviewed, so what&#8217;s missing?</p>
<p>When I was a PC user I primarily used FireFox, for which I only snagged a couple plugins:  Flashblock being the main one I&#8217;m missing from Safari.  The other plugins I grabbed for FF were to do things Safari does by default, like open external links in a new tab and force new window links to open in a tab instead.  There are a plethora of plugins available for firefox nowadays, but it seems to me that they just slow the app down if not crash it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not anti-plugin, I just haven&#8217;t seen any that actually help me do work or enjoy the web more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ross</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about SeaMonkey, the direct descendent of Mozilla Suite?  This is lacking some of the user-interface bugs that are found in Firefox.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about SeaMonkey, the direct descendent of Mozilla Suite?  This is lacking some of the user-interface bugs that are found in Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pierre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi

As mentionned above, iCab is missing from that review, but it&#039;s still beta and quite slow (developer says somewhere that this is due to debug code) on sites making a heavy use of CSS2, but I think it&#039;s the more W3C compliant of all, the one that has the most extensive preferences, and like Safari, the only Mac-only browser ... All the others have a cross-platform rendering engine (although Safari could be said to use the khtml linux rendering engine, but I don&#039;t think they could be re-united).

As a web developper, I also have been testing a lot of browser, but I have to admit I always come back to Camino because it&#039;s the only browser that I can use everyday without switching with another for doing a specific task.

Yes Opera (tested on PC and Mac up to 9, user since v3) is super-fast, has very interesting features, but it also has random problems with the Plesk Web hosting interface (used by many web host). And also not that many people are using it (PC Mac) so it&#039;s not my primary choice for web-developping (although one may say that if your design works in Opera, it usually works everywhere). Also, and even though you may disable it, Opera can do RSS and Mail, and I prefer soft doing only one task (even Mozilla broke into Firefox Thunderbird, why does Opera go the other way is beyond me).

Safari also has random problems with Plesk, and also some problems with the way it handles SSL certificates (even though certificates are stored in keychain, Safari does not seem to be able to choose between 2 different personal certificate for a same web address like if you want 2 different user filling their income tax on the same machine).

Firefox is still a little buggy, but I use it with the WebDevelopper extension, a must ! Look and feel not that great, especially checkboxes, form fields, etc ...

I tested/used the others, but for me, the important point is the rendering engine more than the additionnal features, so ... I stick with Camino for the time being.

Also I think it&#039;s funny, people going for Camino because is lean, and after that looking for plug-ins and extensions ... same for Firefox, with plug-ins thay are re-constructing the full Mozilla/Netscape suite they said was to bloated ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>As mentionned above, iCab is missing from that review, but it&#8217;s still beta and quite slow (developer says somewhere that this is due to debug code) on sites making a heavy use of CSS2, but I think it&#8217;s the more W3C compliant of all, the one that has the most extensive preferences, and like Safari, the only Mac-only browser &#8230; All the others have a cross-platform rendering engine (although Safari could be said to use the khtml linux rendering engine, but I don&#8217;t think they could be re-united).</p>
<p>As a web developper, I also have been testing a lot of browser, but I have to admit I always come back to Camino because it&#8217;s the only browser that I can use everyday without switching with another for doing a specific task.</p>
<p>Yes Opera (tested on PC and Mac up to 9, user since v3) is super-fast, has very interesting features, but it also has random problems with the Plesk Web hosting interface (used by many web host). And also not that many people are using it (PC Mac) so it&#8217;s not my primary choice for web-developping (although one may say that if your design works in Opera, it usually works everywhere). Also, and even though you may disable it, Opera can do RSS and Mail, and I prefer soft doing only one task (even Mozilla broke into Firefox Thunderbird, why does Opera go the other way is beyond me).</p>
<p>Safari also has random problems with Plesk, and also some problems with the way it handles SSL certificates (even though certificates are stored in keychain, Safari does not seem to be able to choose between 2 different personal certificate for a same web address like if you want 2 different user filling their income tax on the same machine).</p>
<p>Firefox is still a little buggy, but I use it with the WebDevelopper extension, a must ! Look and feel not that great, especially checkboxes, form fields, etc &#8230;</p>
<p>I tested/used the others, but for me, the important point is the rendering engine more than the additionnal features, so &#8230; I stick with Camino for the time being.</p>
<p>Also I think it&#8217;s funny, people going for Camino because is lean, and after that looking for plug-ins and extensions &#8230; same for Firefox, with plug-ins thay are re-constructing the full Mozilla/Netscape suite they said was to bloated &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bv</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[do some research as previously stated. i didn&#039;t read the entire string but all i can say is flock has a future if it would be stable. if you are lucky enough to get your mits on shiro beta v2 please do. it kicks some serious ass. it lacks in the rss department but it has apple written all over it.
it&#039;s easy on the eyes to say the least... but you better be able to speak more than english. ;)
peace.
bv.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do some research as previously stated. i didn&#8217;t read the entire string but all i can say is flock has a future if it would be stable. if you are lucky enough to get your mits on shiro beta v2 please do. it kicks some serious ass. it lacks in the rss department but it has apple written all over it.<br />
it&#8217;s easy on the eyes to say the least&#8230; but you better be able to speak more than english. ;)<br />
peace.<br />
bv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Pate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Pate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, you guys love testing browsers! Anything we can do to make Flock better, just let us know.

Cheers,

Will Pate
Community Ambassador, Flock]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you guys love testing browsers! Anything we can do to make Flock better, just let us know.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Will Pate<br />
Community Ambassador, Flock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic mitham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nic mitham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;ve used safari ever since i bought my first mac. about a month ago (after some hard-drive issues) i switched briefly to firefox. i felt strange as i really got used to safari........BUT.......having tried Camino three days ago, i am totally hooked on it....super fast, and now super pimped.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve used safari ever since i bought my first mac. about a month ago (after some hard-drive issues) i switched briefly to firefox. i felt strange as i really got used to safari&#8230;&#8230;..BUT&#8230;&#8230;.having tried Camino three days ago, i am totally hooked on it&#8230;.super fast, and now super pimped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Teare</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Teare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your dock looks as cluttered as mine -- I have so many browsers it&#039;s not funny.

The main ones I use are Camino, Firefox, Safari, and Flock, in that order.  The biggest pain of switching browsers has been keeping my passwords synchronized between them.  I got tired of being forced to remember which browser had my password for a particular site, so I wrote my own &lt;a href=&quot;http://1passwd.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Password Manager&lt;/a&gt; that uses the keychain and provides extensions for these 4 browsers.

I have heard good things about OmniWeb and Shiira, so I&#039;ll be adding support for them soon.  I wish I could support Opera as well, but their extension mechanism is severely limited (AFAIK).

Cheers!
Dave Teare
Co-author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://1Passwd.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1Passwd: Password Manager for Mac&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your dock looks as cluttered as mine &#8212; I have so many browsers it&#8217;s not funny.</p>
<p>The main ones I use are Camino, Firefox, Safari, and Flock, in that order.  The biggest pain of switching browsers has been keeping my passwords synchronized between them.  I got tired of being forced to remember which browser had my password for a particular site, so I wrote my own <a href="http://1passwd.com" rel="nofollow">Password Manager</a> that uses the keychain and provides extensions for these 4 browsers.</p>
<p>I have heard good things about OmniWeb and Shiira, so I&#8217;ll be adding support for them soon.  I wish I could support Opera as well, but their extension mechanism is severely limited (AFAIK).</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Dave Teare<br />
Co-author of <a href="http://1Passwd.com" rel="nofollow">1Passwd: Password Manager for Mac</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting article dude!

@Dan

I think this was a OS X rendering bug and it has been fixed with the latest OS X update. Have a look at that page: http://hivelogic.com/articles/2006/06/28/mac_os_x_10_4_7]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article dude!</p>
<p>@Dan</p>
<p>I think this was a OS X rendering bug and it has been fixed with the latest OS X update. Have a look at that page: <a href="http://hivelogic.com/articles/2006/06/28/mac_os_x_10_4_7" rel="nofollow">http://hivelogic.com/articles/2006/06/28/mac_os_x_10_4_7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinarut</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinarut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very nice comprehensive review of browsers esp when I&#039;ve been on the browser run myself!

I was a Camino for quite some time until a few Firefox extensions caught my attention.

Flock has really caught my attention due to its Flickr integration and ease of inserting photos into just about anything.   Admittedly, Flock was overwhleming at first when I first tried it 9 months ago and as the article says, come with Web 2.0 eyes and you&#039;ll set aside the growing pains and see the future as the integrations get worked out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice comprehensive review of browsers esp when I&#8217;ve been on the browser run myself!</p>
<p>I was a Camino for quite some time until a few Firefox extensions caught my attention.</p>
<p>Flock has really caught my attention due to its Flickr integration and ease of inserting photos into just about anything.   Admittedly, Flock was overwhleming at first when I first tried it 9 months ago and as the article says, come with Web 2.0 eyes and you&#8217;ll set aside the growing pains and see the future as the integrations get worked out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sameer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sameer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 2.0 Beta 1 (Bon Echo) seems to work really well on OS X, and I&#039;ve found it to be quite faster than the 1.5 stable release. Being a beta release though, it doesnt support quite a few extensions (yet) or themes that most people might have installed, but thats alright since a periodic update will re-enable most of the unsupported extensions that lie dormant.

http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bonecho/all-beta.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2.0 Beta 1 (Bon Echo) seems to work really well on OS X, and I&#8217;ve found it to be quite faster than the 1.5 stable release. Being a beta release though, it doesnt support quite a few extensions (yet) or themes that most people might have installed, but thats alright since a periodic update will re-enable most of the unsupported extensions that lie dormant.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bonecho/all-beta.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bonecho/all-beta.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kym</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kym]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to burst your Firefox rant bubble but : http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000803024910/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to burst your Firefox rant bubble but : <a href="http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000803024910/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000803024910/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leland Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/got-browser/#comment-311650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leland Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/07/19/got-browser/#comment-311650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry... this article is all opinion and no facts.  Even what appear to be facts are wrong.  For example, it&#039;s been pointed out that &quot;Safari is the bare bones of what you need in a browser; no extensions, no plugins...&quot; is simply wrong, and anyone who&#039;s followed the browser market as a whole for long would know this.

In fact, a similarly ignorant person would say the same thing about Camino... that it has no extensions and no plugins.  It does, but they&#039;re even fewer than what&#039;s available for Safari.  Just because there aren&#039;t as many as for Firefox or IE doesn&#039;t mean there are none.  (Someone else already mentioned Pimp My Safari website, but there&#039;s also Pimp  My Camino: http://www.pimpmycamino.com/)

And then to leave out Opera, which is the fastest browser available for the Mac, is just inexcusable.

Finally, it&#039;s an obvious comparison, but a misleading one, to say that Safari is to OS X as IE is to Windows.  Yes, Safari is the default OS X browser now, but unlike IE, it&#039;s also one of the very best on that platform, whereas IE at this point is about the worst.

If you&#039;re interested in a more factual review of the major Mac OS X browsers, check out the one I did last month: http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/05/all-the-lovely-browsers.html

Leland]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230; this article is all opinion and no facts.  Even what appear to be facts are wrong.  For example, it&#8217;s been pointed out that &#8220;Safari is the bare bones of what you need in a browser; no extensions, no plugins&#8230;&#8221; is simply wrong, and anyone who&#8217;s followed the browser market as a whole for long would know this.</p>
<p>In fact, a similarly ignorant person would say the same thing about Camino&#8230; that it has no extensions and no plugins.  It does, but they&#8217;re even fewer than what&#8217;s available for Safari.  Just because there aren&#8217;t as many as for Firefox or IE doesn&#8217;t mean there are none.  (Someone else already mentioned Pimp My Safari website, but there&#8217;s also Pimp  My Camino: <a href="http://www.pimpmycamino.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pimpmycamino.com/</a>)</p>
<p>And then to leave out Opera, which is the fastest browser available for the Mac, is just inexcusable.</p>
<p>Finally, it&#8217;s an obvious comparison, but a misleading one, to say that Safari is to OS X as IE is to Windows.  Yes, Safari is the default OS X browser now, but unlike IE, it&#8217;s also one of the very best on that platform, whereas IE at this point is about the worst.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in a more factual review of the major Mac OS X browsers, check out the one I did last month: <a href="http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/05/all-the-lovely-browsers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/05/all-the-lovely-browsers.html</a></p>
<p>Leland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

