<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get VMware Fusion for $39</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Law Students &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $39 for VMware Fusion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac Law Students &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $39 for VMware Fusion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 03:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] VMware&#8217;s answer to Parallels won&#8217;t be shipping until August or later, but you can get a nice deal on it if you pre-order. The normally $79 virtualization software is available at $39 for a limited time for early adopters of their 1.0 release. Tip o&#8217; the hat to The Apple Blog. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VMware&#8217;s answer to Parallels won&#8217;t be shipping until August or later, but you can get a nice deal on it if you pre-order. The normally $79 virtualization software is available at $39 for a limited time for early adopters of their 1.0 release. Tip o&#8217; the hat to The Apple Blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[are they planning on supporting aero in V1.0?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are they planning on supporting aero in V1.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VK Sefirosu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VK Sefirosu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=88195&amp;tstart=0

This should help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=88195&#038;tstart=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=88195&#038;tstart=0</a></p>
<p>This should help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good call there tycho; in fact, i followed an out of date &quot;conversion&quot; process for parallels xp vm install to a fusion one and it was a total failure. i really wanted to try out the fusion betas, but i don&#039;t want to go through the hassle of getting my copy of xp re-registered/verified through ms and also to have to resetup my visual studio dev. environment. bottom line, fusion looks awesome, but until i can convert or just USE my parallels xp install in fusion, i won&#039;t get around to trying it out anytime soon. &#039;sides i just dropped a few more bones on v3 of parallels after buying their initial offering earlier this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good call there tycho; in fact, i followed an out of date &#8220;conversion&#8221; process for parallels xp vm install to a fusion one and it was a total failure. i really wanted to try out the fusion betas, but i don&#8217;t want to go through the hassle of getting my copy of xp re-registered/verified through ms and also to have to resetup my visual studio dev. environment. bottom line, fusion looks awesome, but until i can convert or just USE my parallels xp install in fusion, i won&#8217;t get around to trying it out anytime soon. &#8216;sides i just dropped a few more bones on v3 of parallels after buying their initial offering earlier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tycho</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tycho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/06/13/get-vmware-fusion-for-39/#comment-321418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And yes, what we&#039;ve seen on the web is pretty impressive.  But for those of us that have Parallels installed already, the inability to utilise Parallels&#039; XP installation makes for a tedious crossgrade...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, what we&#8217;ve seen on the web is pretty impressive.  But for those of us that have Parallels installed already, the inability to utilise Parallels&#8217; XP installation makes for a tedious crossgrade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

