<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Developers React to iPhone 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Riley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex Riley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bluetooth accessory communications!

That means it&#039;ll be possible to NXHost work cycles off the smartphone to MacOS X and deliver the goodies to the handheld.  Cool... someday]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bluetooth accessory communications!</p>
<p>That means it&#8217;ll be possible to NXHost work cycles off the smartphone to MacOS X and deliver the goodies to the handheld.  Cool&#8230; someday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly App Store Picks: March 21, 2009</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekly App Store Picks: March 21, 2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] developers, there&#8217;s some serious potential for advanced apps that the iPhone update&#8217;s APIs will bring. In particular, access to the iPod library for apps [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] developers, there&#8217;s some serious potential for advanced apps that the iPhone update&#8217;s APIs will bring. In particular, access to the iPod library for apps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lesposen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lesposen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@6Patrick: Here in Oz, to &quot;turf&quot; indeed means to discard or get rid of, said to be done with some disdain or alacrity. Several possibilities: To bury (in the turf) or go to ground. Probably unrelated to the once popular Turf brand of cigarettes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@6Patrick: Here in Oz, to &#8220;turf&#8221; indeed means to discard or get rid of, said to be done with some disdain or alacrity. Several possibilities: To bury (in the turf) or go to ground. Probably unrelated to the once popular Turf brand of cigarettes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To HobbesDoo and Richard, can you explain to me the etymology of &quot;turf&quot;? From the context I believe it means &quot;discard&quot;, but any more explanation (word origin, source, etc.) would be appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To HobbesDoo and Richard, can you explain to me the etymology of &#8220;turf&#8221;? From the context I believe it means &#8220;discard&#8221;, but any more explanation (word origin, source, etc.) would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Mirror &#124; Five Developers React to iPhone 3.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Mirror &#124; Five Developers React to iPhone 3.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Five Developers React to iPhone 3.0  March 18th, 2009  Goto comments Leave a comment        With all the big announcements from Apple’s iPhone briefing yesterday, the web has been abuzz with talk about the impact this will have on the iPhone. I managed to corner a few iPhone developers that have paid releases out in the app &#8230; See the rest here: Five Developers React to iPhone 3.0 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Five Developers React to iPhone 3.0  March 18th, 2009  Goto comments Leave a comment        With all the big announcements from Apple’s iPhone briefing yesterday, the web has been abuzz with talk about the impact this will have on the iPhone. I managed to corner a few iPhone developers that have paid releases out in the app &#8230; See the rest here: Five Developers React to iPhone 3.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For comparison, in the next year, the install base for iPhone OS X (iPhone and iPod touch) will likely pass that of Mac OS X. 

(Since the intro of the PowerMac G3 and Powerbook G3, there have been about 52m Macs sold. And though they can use some version of OS X, not all of them can use Leopard, nor are all still in use.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For comparison, in the next year, the install base for iPhone OS X (iPhone and iPod touch) will likely pass that of Mac OS X. </p>
<p>(Since the intro of the PowerMac G3 and Powerbook G3, there have been about 52m Macs sold. And though they can use some version of OS X, not all of them can use Leopard, nor are all still in use.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What to Read on GigaOM Network Today</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What to Read on GigaOM Network Today]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Memo: Best Friends. (WebWorkerDaily) Mozilla reveals plans for Internet Tablets. (jkOnTheRun) What do developers think of iPhone 3.0 OS. (theAppleBlog) ABC, MTV making money off Web Streaming. (NewTeeVee)    [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Memo: Best Friends. (WebWorkerDaily) Mozilla reveals plans for Internet Tablets. (jkOnTheRun) What do developers think of iPhone 3.0 OS. (theAppleBlog) ABC, MTV making money off Web Streaming. (NewTeeVee)    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazoobee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gazoobee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ HobbesDoo:

As one of the ones that thought that 3.0 would introduce multi-tasking and a bunch of other stuff that would not be backwards compatible with the current low power iPhones, I agree.  

It looks now that we will have to wait for Apple to introduce &quot;beefier&quot; devices (perhaps this year) and for those devices to become the norm before any serious upgrade to the base OS happens.  This makes sense for the reasons you outlined.  It won&#039;t leave people behind thinking they have to buy a new phone to get the new goodness of 3.0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ HobbesDoo:</p>
<p>As one of the ones that thought that 3.0 would introduce multi-tasking and a bunch of other stuff that would not be backwards compatible with the current low power iPhones, I agree.  </p>
<p>It looks now that we will have to wait for Apple to introduce &#8220;beefier&#8221; devices (perhaps this year) and for those devices to become the norm before any serious upgrade to the base OS happens.  This makes sense for the reasons you outlined.  It won&#8217;t leave people behind thinking they have to buy a new phone to get the new goodness of 3.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Hobbes. I was a bit concerned when the 3.0 discussion started a while back with some other developers, that we were going to have to turf our contract iPhones and get on a new contract just to have the newest to use the newest. This business Model of Apples, when it comes to this sort of thing I really enjoy.

I am excited to say the least, just wish I had my paid developer status still, then I could be playing with it right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Hobbes. I was a bit concerned when the 3.0 discussion started a while back with some other developers, that we were going to have to turf our contract iPhones and get on a new contract just to have the newest to use the newest. This business Model of Apples, when it comes to this sort of thing I really enjoy.</p>
<p>I am excited to say the least, just wish I had my paid developer status still, then I could be playing with it right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 reacciones de desarrolladores a la 3.0 de iPhone &#171; maclatino.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[5 reacciones de desarrolladores a la 3.0 de iPhone &#171; maclatino.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] que todo esto no traiga mas que satisfacciones para los usuarios del afamado teléfono de Apple.   Desde aquí accede al articulo, ( en ingles ).  Vía &#124; the apple blog  Firmwares, iPhone, iPods0   Comparte [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] que todo esto no traiga mas que satisfacciones para los usuarios del afamado teléfono de Apple.   Desde aquí accede al articulo, ( en ingles ).  Vía | the apple blog  Firmwares, iPhone, iPods0   Comparte [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreas04: close to attraction</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andreas04: close to attraction]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [via The Apple Blog] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via The Apple Blog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HobbesDoo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HobbesDoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the things I like the most about this platform is the longevity of the hardware. It used to drive me crazy with Windows Mobile that at every new version of the software I would have to pretty much turf my existing hardware and buy a new one. Now you can still use the first generation iPhone as well as the latest one. That&#039;s pretty cool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I like the most about this platform is the longevity of the hardware. It used to drive me crazy with Windows Mobile that at every new version of the software I would have to pretty much turf my existing hardware and buy a new one. Now you can still use the first generation iPhone as well as the latest one. That&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abraginsky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/five-developers-react-to-iphone-30/#comment-342331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[abraginsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=19720#comment-342331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see the 3rd party Bluetooth keyboards already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the 3rd party Bluetooth keyboards already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

