<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FileBrowse 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordmike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The program looks great, but hasn&#039;t a lot of this been done before in Windows XP and probably in Gnome or KDE?
I didn&#039;t read the full article, the pictures said it all. I want this app.
I was just curious about the fact that it looks a lot like windows xp windows explorer using thumbnails, which is not a bad thing if it has been improved.
I also think Acdsee did something like this for windows many years ago, but that app got extremly bloated and unfriendly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The program looks great, but hasn&#8217;t a lot of this been done before in Windows XP and probably in Gnome or KDE?<br />
I didn&#8217;t read the full article, the pictures said it all. I want this app.<br />
I was just curious about the fact that it looks a lot like windows xp windows explorer using thumbnails, which is not a bad thing if it has been improved.<br />
I also think Acdsee did something like this for windows many years ago, but that app got extremly bloated and unfriendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert van Uitert</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert van Uitert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romain: Thanks a lot for your excellent review of my program. :-)

I&#039;ll make it an option in a future version to turn off the dangling folder icons and to make the animation faster/shorter.

Double-clicking will also become an option. The problem with it is that a preview is shown on the first click and the icon can move when the preview is shown, so the 2nd click may not hit the icon. I&#039;ll work around that problem though.

About the price... I thought about what you get for an OS X upgrade. I remember at one point I had 10.2 and 10.3 on two different Macs, and the only real difference for me as a user was Exposé. And that cost $129... (10.4 was totally worth that amount of money, but 10.3?...) Anyway... FileBrowse 1.5 will have file management (moving, copying, renaming, creating folders and aliases, full drag-and-drop, etc.) and will be a free upgrade for registered users of 1.0.x. It should be available in less than 2 months.

Matt: FileBrowse only communicates with servers when it has to create a thumbnail for a web page. Most notably for &quot;.webloc&quot; files, sometimes also for &quot;.webarchive&quot; and HTML files. The thumbnail is just like a page in a web browser then (using WebKit, like Safari), but smaller and non-interactive.

Thanks for the kind words everyone. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romain: Thanks a lot for your excellent review of my program. :-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll make it an option in a future version to turn off the dangling folder icons and to make the animation faster/shorter.</p>
<p>Double-clicking will also become an option. The problem with it is that a preview is shown on the first click and the icon can move when the preview is shown, so the 2nd click may not hit the icon. I&#8217;ll work around that problem though.</p>
<p>About the price&#8230; I thought about what you get for an OS X upgrade. I remember at one point I had 10.2 and 10.3 on two different Macs, and the only real difference for me as a user was Exposé. And that cost $129&#8230; (10.4 was totally worth that amount of money, but 10.3?&#8230;) Anyway&#8230; FileBrowse 1.5 will have file management (moving, copying, renaming, creating folders and aliases, full drag-and-drop, etc.) and will be a free upgrade for registered users of 1.0.x. It should be available in less than 2 months.</p>
<p>Matt: FileBrowse only communicates with servers when it has to create a thumbnail for a web page. Most notably for &#8220;.webloc&#8221; files, sometimes also for &#8220;.webarchive&#8221; and HTML files. The thumbnail is just like a page in a web browser then (using WebKit, like Safari), but smaller and non-interactive.</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words everyone. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romain Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romain Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 12:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed it is, thanks for the pointer! (It does not look very nice though ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is, thanks for the pointer! (It does not look very nice though ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1:31 am &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Filebrowse</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1:31 am &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Filebrowse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 09:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The appleblog has a nice run through of filebrowse a visual enhancement for the osx&#8217;s finder. Big icons and a different way of sorting information. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The appleblog has a nice run through of filebrowse a visual enhancement for the osx&#8217;s finder. Big icons and a different way of sorting information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 07:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn´t this program like the total commander?
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/system_disk_utilities/diskorder.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn´t this program like the total commander?<br />
<a href="http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/system_disk_utilities/diskorder.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/system_disk_utilities/diskorder.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romain Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romain Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bv &gt; FileBrowse is not meant to replace the Finder but rather supplement it. But yeah, I&#039;d love to have something as powerful as say Total Commander (from Windows) on my Mac.

itsanaddams &gt; I could not agree more with you but I do buy quite a lot of software on Mac OS X, most of the time to show my support towards the developers. I actually hesitated quite a lot with FileBrowse but I just can&#039;t buy every single app I&#039;d like to support on Mac OS X, otherwise I&#039;d be broke very quickly ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bv &gt; FileBrowse is not meant to replace the Finder but rather supplement it. But yeah, I&#8217;d love to have something as powerful as say Total Commander (from Windows) on my Mac.</p>
<p>itsanaddams &gt; I could not agree more with you but I do buy quite a lot of software on Mac OS X, most of the time to show my support towards the developers. I actually hesitated quite a lot with FileBrowse but I just can&#8217;t buy every single app I&#8217;d like to support on Mac OS X, otherwise I&#8217;d be broke very quickly ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P.S.  I think I may&#039;ve been a little over-zealous in my last comment.  I think it&#039;s probably just a &quot;checking for updates&quot; kind of thing.  It&#039;s difficult to tell when the network traffic is happening via Activity Monitor.  Apologies for being paranoid. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  I think I may&#8217;ve been a little over-zealous in my last comment.  I think it&#8217;s probably just a &#8220;checking for updates&#8221; kind of thing.  It&#8217;s difficult to tell when the network traffic is happening via Activity Monitor.  Apologies for being paranoid. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems like a wonderful program, but there&#039;s something about it that makes me a little suspicious...

I happened to have Activity Monitor open while I was using it, and everytime I open a folder with it the &#039;Network Traffic&#039; chart spikes.  This would suggest it&#039;s communicating with some external server for something... If anyone could check up on this to find out why?

It&#039;s a very nice, very intuitive program, that I&#039;d like to buy, but in these days of spyware and malware, it always seems like you can never be too cautious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a wonderful program, but there&#8217;s something about it that makes me a little suspicious&#8230;</p>
<p>I happened to have Activity Monitor open while I was using it, and everytime I open a folder with it the &#8216;Network Traffic&#8217; chart spikes.  This would suggest it&#8217;s communicating with some external server for something&#8230; If anyone could check up on this to find out why?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a very nice, very intuitive program, that I&#8217;d like to buy, but in these days of spyware and malware, it always seems like you can never be too cautious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aashish</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aashish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haha...God of War. Excellent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha&#8230;God of War. Excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bv</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/filebrowse-1/#comment-313637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2006/10/06/filebrowse-1/#comment-313637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice app. i wish there was a true replacement to the finder. it&#039;s way behind. hopefully it will soon add some advanced features(?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice app. i wish there was a true replacement to the finder. it&#8217;s way behind. hopefully it will soon add some advanced features(?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

