Doing the Job With Obsolete Hardware in a Recession

While my new unibody MacBook is pretty state-of-the-art, and indeed the most contemporaneously avant garde computer I’ve ever owned, I’m still a fan of good older hardware and getting a lot of useful work out of my two nine-year-old Pismo PowerBooks.
The Pismo, for a variety of reasons, has proved an extraordinarily long-lived machine in terms of practical usefulness, thanks in no small part to its expandability, connectivity, and upgradability, representing what was arguably the all time high-water mark for those qualities in Mac laptops. It also has a really good keyboard, which makes it a continued tactile pleasure to work with.
Both of mine have been upgraded with G4 550 MHz processors, replacing the original 500 MHz G3s, and 8x dual-layer DVD-burning SuperDrives. The also have 576MB and 640 MB of RAM respectively (and would support up to 1 GB), larger capacity 40 GB and 100 GB hard drives, plus Wi-Fi and FireWire 800 PC Cardbus adapters. They’re running Mac OS X 10.4.11, which is as far as I intend to go with system software notwithstanding the potential for hacked Leopard installs. Pretty modest by today’s standards, but they’re lively enough as to not be at all frustrating for the sort of basic text and web-based stuff I do with them.
Just Plain Nice to Use
Heavier lifting I leave to my newer G4 PowerBook and now the unibody MacBook 2.0 GHz I just bought, but I have no intention of putting the Pismos out to pasture anytime soon. They suit a niche in my workflow and are just plain nice to use.
However, even more typical and less hotrodding-friendly laptops (and desktops as well) are capable of providing longer service than has been customary, or at least was before the economy nosedived.
Sufficiently Powerful
BusinessWeek’s Roger L. Kay sensibly contends, and I agree, that if your ancient IT equipment is running fine and sufficiently powerful for the work it’s tasked with, you shouldn’t hesitate to try squeezing a few more more years of service out of it until this foundering economy hopefully begins to recover.
Kay cites the example of his Hewlett-Packard Jornada notebook that’s even older than my Pismos, being a demo unit from a HP press event in 1998, observing that although dated by any definition (to say the least!), “the old Jornada remains – year after year – exactly the right tool for the job at hand… Every time I open this device, I of course have to endure the mockery of my peers. But at the same time, I am struck by a number of principles.”
One of those, he says, is longevity of technology, speculating that his Jornada could easily remain in service for another decade if not for a deliberate cycle of planned obsolescence characterized on the PC side by Microsoft’s replacement of Windows XP by Vista, Intel’s ongoing architectural changes, and the push to substitute Blu-ray for older optical drive formats, conceding that computers are getting better in some ways, have more features, but not necessary longer-lasting or more reliable.
The “Good Enough” Factor
Then there’s the “good enough” factor, which must be determined in the context of what you need it to be good enough for. If an electronic notebook is all you need it for, that ancient HP Jornada with its instant-on 8.2″ display, puny 190MHz StrongARM processor, 16MB of RAM and 16MB SSD running Windows CE and Pocket Word is more than adequate. I used to do real work — graphics creation as well as word crunching — on an 8 MHz Mac Plus with 2.5 MB of RAM, and it was lively too.
Compared to Kay’s old Jornada, my Pismos are powerhouses, and again, in the context of what I need them to do for me they are quite adequate, demanding little sacrifice in convenience, and regardless of what the economy does I’ll be surprised if I’m not still using at least one of them three or four years from now.
This distempered year, with household and enterprise budgets in tatters, leaving both individuals and corporate IT managers wondering if they can wring another year or two of useful service out of their existing hardware, the good news is that they probably can. As Roger Kay says, “A good tool should last a long time.”
That said, I’m going to enjoy using my new MacBook.
Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.
I envy you and your macbook. I unfortunately bought my macbook about 2 months to early. But it suits every purpose I use it for, and it’s got 4 gb of ram and a 320gb 7200rpm drive now so it’ll have plenty of life in it. However as much as I love my macbook, I recently sort of revived my failed logic board iBook G4 and I love using it. It’s plenty fast and is more than adequate for travel and other things, saving some wear and tear on my macbook. Anyway props to macs for having long lives!
While I certainly applaud the use of older tech (I recently upgraded to an original xbox), as well as the purchase of new (I recently purchased a 2.4 Ghz uni Macbook), I’m curious about what you use those four computers for. At the moment I’m hard pressed to find a suitable purpose for my 5-year-old Dell laptop (busted and removed screen); currently it’s hooked up to an external monitor and used for streaming Netflix and doing downloads. However, I have a hard time justifying those uses, because my Macbook does those just as well or better.
I agree with you %100 when it comes to wether having the latest and greatest is more important than usefulness and longevity. I’m still using my powerbook 5300cs as my to go machine and a g3 upgraded powermac 9600 running os x 10.2.8 as my desktop. Even the old apple IIe I restored over the last summer is getting some use as a gaming machine ( child of the “70′s :-) ). Getting more bang for my buck over time is what has kept me a mac user over all these years.
My primary desktop and laptop computers are a PowerMac G4 Cube (with 800MHz CPU, HDD, and video card upgrades) running 10.5.6 and a 800MHz G3 iBook running 10.4.11.
They both do fine for web, email, office, and light gaming. Even YouTube/Hulu/etc. is usable. I was looking at the MSI Wind netbook for use as a Hackintosh until I read that such units GeekBench about the same as a 1.2GHz iBook G4. The fact that people are buying and happily using such netbooks truly illustrates that many users don’t need the power of the latest and greatest. I must admit that it is frustrating when newer services (streaming Netflix, etc.) are limited to the newer Intel Macs, but I can wait for Snow Leopard to come out before upgrading to a new Intel Mac.
Hi again, Charles. Great article, and thanks for the BusinessWeek article link (I actually subscribe to the mag, but must have overlooked that one). I only recently retired my loaded Pismo (sold to a client of mine, who positively loves it). I was a tad reluctant to let it go, but I was anxious to get the bucks together for my new (to me) 1.67GHz PowerBook G4 AlBook. The principal reason for the change-up was that I wanted a laptop that had roughly performance parity with my desktop Mac (dual-1.25GHz FW800 MDD G4 tower) with better graphics capability for Photoshop and such; it makes a good stand-in just ion case something goes on the fritz with the tower. The Pismo, old as it was, was almost all the PowerBook I could ask for; with this AlBook, my cup practically runneth over. No MacIntel-envy here, nice as they are! (Hope you enjoy yours, though.)
This baby is sticking with me for a while.
Hi David B.
You asked what my four Apple ‘Books are used for. In a nutshell:
PowerBook G4 17″ 1.33 GHz/ 1.5 GB/ 80GB – Main workhorse computer. Most research and article development, Web surfing, Online banking, email, printing, software testing for reviews. Set up as a desktop laptop workstation connected to a mess of peripherals.
Pismo # 1 550 MHz G4 /576 MB/ 40 GB – general utility machine used avay from main workstation around the house for drafting, html markup, Web posting, some email and surfing.
Pismo # 2 550 MHz G4/640 MB/100 GB – Serves as raod warrioring machine for mobile use. Also do most of my scanning and a fair bit of image editing on it. Also most disk burning as it has a better DVD drive than the old aluminum PowerBook does.
Unibody MacBook 2.0 GHz/ 2 GB/ 160 GB – Slated to take over as anchor machine from teh 17″ PowerBook, whose role when that come to pass is still undetermined, but for a while at least it will be the understudy and plan B backup.
Charles
Charles,
Thanks for the explanation. I can see that your setup justifies using four notebooks. Great article, and, again, thanks for the response!
Ahh, I will never forget the years of pleasure I recived from my beloved Pismo.
http://www.interactivehank.com/blog/?p=117
Henry
Your article is good advice, whether there is a recession or not. :)
I also have a Pismo upgraded in every possible way, including a 550 MHz G4. It has a battery in both the left and right bays, so it runs a long time between charges. My current primary Mac is a 2006 iMac that I got about one year ago as an “Apple certified” refurb. But when I’m away from my desk, my Pismo still does a great job. I plan to keep using it as my “away” Mac for many more years.
Hi Ken;
I forgot to mention that I have FastMac extended life batteries in my Pismos. I can get five hours out of a charge with only minor power conservation measures (eg: turning the backlight down somewhat). With two batteries (I have a spare) that means 10 hours plus.
My new NacBook is and Apple Certified Refurbished unit as is my 17″ PowerBook.
Charles