<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending Apple’s Good Looks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 12:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: .terceiro vagão &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Forma, função e sistemas operacionais</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.terceiro vagão &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Forma, função e sistemas operacionais]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] blog que comentei no começo do post fala exatamente sobre isso, e faz uma comparação [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog que comentei no começo do post fala exatamente sobre isso, e faz uma comparação [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone&#039;s that&#039;s enjoyed it so far, thanks. The response has been great to see.

bombastiator: I happen to like the space looking effect. Feels more futuristic, but chances are I won&#039;t keep it for long.

Honza, thanks that made my day =)

Tom and the &quot;debate team&quot;: I agree far more with Joe, the fact is as soon as I switched to OS X, I&#039;ve found new and exciting utilities to use, namely Quicksilver. I think the Windows versions (Skylight, and others) are clunky, ugly, and have very, very few features. That being said I do understand Windows more in a business setting. At work, our company relies heavily on Outlook and Windows for scheduling, networking, etc. I see that changing too eventually, def slowly, but steadily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone&#8217;s that&#8217;s enjoyed it so far, thanks. The response has been great to see.</p>
<p>bombastiator: I happen to like the space looking effect. Feels more futuristic, but chances are I won&#8217;t keep it for long.</p>
<p>Honza, thanks that made my day =)</p>
<p>Tom and the &#8220;debate team&#8221;: I agree far more with Joe, the fact is as soon as I switched to OS X, I&#8217;ve found new and exciting utilities to use, namely Quicksilver. I think the Windows versions (Skylight, and others) are clunky, ugly, and have very, very few features. That being said I do understand Windows more in a business setting. At work, our company relies heavily on Outlook and Windows for scheduling, networking, etc. I see that changing too eventually, def slowly, but steadily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honza</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Honza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They won&#039;t do it. But you can. osx86project.org.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won&#8217;t do it. But you can. osx86project.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe I can see what you&#039;re saying, and I think you tend to get better apps in Linux too. But considering that there will &lt;i&gt;always&lt;/i&gt; be something I want to run in Windows, be it a game or app, then what it comes down to for me is do I have dual boot OSX and Windows, or dual boot Linux and Windows. I think both solutions work equally well, but if I go for OSX / Windows I either spend twice as much on hardware, or get half the machine specifications for the same money. This is why I&#039;d like to see OSX on standard PCs. That said I don&#039;t think it would be a good move for Apple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe I can see what you&#8217;re saying, and I think you tend to get better apps in Linux too. But considering that there will <i>always</i> be something I want to run in Windows, be it a game or app, then what it comes down to for me is do I have dual boot OSX and Windows, or dual boot Linux and Windows. I think both solutions work equally well, but if I go for OSX / Windows I either spend twice as much on hardware, or get half the machine specifications for the same money. This is why I&#8217;d like to see OSX on standard PCs. That said I don&#8217;t think it would be a good move for Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;the majority of interesting little apps you find kicking around the web and want to try out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I thought this at first, too, when I moved fully to Mac a few years ago. But what I&#039;ve found is actually quite the opposite. 1) most of the &quot;little tools&quot; written for Windows are complete crap. 2) I have been hardpressed to find a tool or app that I used regularly on Windows that does not have a Mac equivalent. The &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; program I need to run regularly on Windows is MS Money, but that&#039;s a major application, not just a hacker tool or whatever.

I like to think of it in this way. For almost any Windows utility or app, there are 100 different tools or programs you can use. 95 of those programs are shit - they look like shit, and the often function like shit. The other 5 are OK, and you might find one or two that are really good.

On Mac, though, you might only find 5, 8 or 10 tools that do the same thing. But on the whole, the form and function of all the Mac tools are much higher than the plethora of &lt;i&gt;crap&lt;/i&gt; that is out there for Windows. Then of the limited number of Mac tools, half of them will be OK to Good, and the other half will be great, usually with a couple standouts that are excellent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the majority of interesting little apps you find kicking around the web and want to try out.</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought this at first, too, when I moved fully to Mac a few years ago. But what I&#8217;ve found is actually quite the opposite. 1) most of the &#8220;little tools&#8221; written for Windows are complete crap. 2) I have been hardpressed to find a tool or app that I used regularly on Windows that does not have a Mac equivalent. The <i>only</i> program I need to run regularly on Windows is MS Money, but that&#8217;s a major application, not just a hacker tool or whatever.</p>
<p>I like to think of it in this way. For almost any Windows utility or app, there are 100 different tools or programs you can use. 95 of those programs are shit &#8211; they look like shit, and the often function like shit. The other 5 are OK, and you might find one or two that are really good.</p>
<p>On Mac, though, you might only find 5, 8 or 10 tools that do the same thing. But on the whole, the form and function of all the Mac tools are much higher than the plethora of <i>crap</i> that is out there for Windows. Then of the limited number of Mac tools, half of them will be OK to Good, and the other half will be great, usually with a couple standouts that are excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with your assignments of form and functionality to the 3 OS choices. You can&#039;t get past the fact that there are lots of things that you can do on Windows which at this point in time you can&#039;t really do on Linux or Mac, so how can you say Windows is not &quot;function&quot;. Examples of this are most games, and the majority of interesting little apps you find kicking around the web and want to try out.
Personally I choose to use linux (PCLinuxOS) for most of my needs (browsing, word processing, email etc), then drop into Windows for games and other odds and sods. I&#039;d be keen to give OS X a decent appraisal and see whether it would replace Linux in my case, but whenever I look at Mac hardware I always get to the checkout and see what I&#039;m actually getting for my money and decide not too. For instance they&#039;re still holding dvd writers to randsome on the lower price models - in this day and age!!! I say we need OS X on PC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your assignments of form and functionality to the 3 OS choices. You can&#8217;t get past the fact that there are lots of things that you can do on Windows which at this point in time you can&#8217;t really do on Linux or Mac, so how can you say Windows is not &#8220;function&#8221;. Examples of this are most games, and the majority of interesting little apps you find kicking around the web and want to try out.<br />
Personally I choose to use linux (PCLinuxOS) for most of my needs (browsing, word processing, email etc), then drop into Windows for games and other odds and sods. I&#8217;d be keen to give OS X a decent appraisal and see whether it would replace Linux in my case, but whenever I look at Mac hardware I always get to the checkout and see what I&#8217;m actually getting for my money and decide not too. For instance they&#8217;re still holding dvd writers to randsome on the lower price models &#8211; in this day and age!!! I say we need OS X on PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the poster above, G4 Mini user for 2-3 years. Never had a problem and lovin the form. Ordered a MacBook a couple of days ago and it&#039;s currently sitting on the shelves in my post office. Gotta love it! And oh, I&#039;m european.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the poster above, G4 Mini user for 2-3 years. Never had a problem and lovin the form. Ordered a MacBook a couple of days ago and it&#8217;s currently sitting on the shelves in my post office. Gotta love it! And oh, I&#8217;m european.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honza</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Honza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think one of the best articles I have read on TAB for a while. I&#039;m also a switcher (2 years later I&#039;m still on my first mac, a G4 mini) after being a PC user since Dos 3 and Windows 3.0. Not looking back with regret, at all :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the best articles I have read on TAB for a while. I&#8217;m also a switcher (2 years later I&#8217;m still on my first mac, a G4 mini) after being a PC user since Dos 3 and Windows 3.0. Not looking back with regret, at all :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bombastiator</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bombastiator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a quick aside o the for issue, I have to say I find the purple space splash screen particularly hideous. To thouse that do not I challenge you to look at the screen and repeat to yourself &quot;giant space sphincter&quot;  It&#039;s kind of like one of those hidden image pictures.  Once it&#039;s pointed out it&#039;s all you can see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a quick aside o the for issue, I have to say I find the purple space splash screen particularly hideous. To thouse that do not I challenge you to look at the screen and repeat to yourself &#8220;giant space sphincter&#8221;  It&#8217;s kind of like one of those hidden image pictures.  Once it&#8217;s pointed out it&#8217;s all you can see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leopard GUI &#124; Artueel blog, over webstandaarden en al</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/defending-apples-good-looks/#comment-325491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leopard GUI &#124; Artueel blog, over webstandaarden en al]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/11/14/defending-apple%e2%80%99s-good-looks/#comment-325491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Op the Apple Blog is net een sterk, aansluitend artikel [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Op the Apple Blog is net een sterk, aansluitend artikel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

