<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing New to Old, Apple 17&#8243; MacBook Pro is Sweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, you&#039;re a unique and beautiful flower.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you&#8217;re a unique and beautiful flower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james    braselton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james    braselton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI   THERE     OPS    MISS   SPELLED   ITS   THE  17   INCH    MACBOOK   PRO   NOT   127  INCHES      IF   THEY   HAD   A  127   INCH   LAPTOP   YOU  COULD   BEAM   INSIDE   THE  COMPUTER    AND  LIVE  IN  IT  LIKE    IN  THE   TRON  MOVIE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI   THERE     OPS    MISS   SPELLED   ITS   THE  17   INCH    MACBOOK   PRO   NOT   127  INCHES      IF   THEY   HAD   A  127   INCH   LAPTOP   YOU  COULD   BEAM   INSIDE   THE  COMPUTER    AND  LIVE  IN  IT  LIKE    IN  THE   TRON  MOVIE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james    braselton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james    braselton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI   THERE     THERE    IS   A  WEBSITE    THAT  SELLS   THE  127  INCH  AMCBOOK   RPO     WITH   2   256   GB  SSDS    FOR  A  TOATAL   OF   512  GB  OF  FLASH  MEMORY    IF  YOU  DONT  MIND  A  RAID   0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI   THERE     THERE    IS   A  WEBSITE    THAT  SELLS   THE  127  INCH  AMCBOOK   RPO     WITH   2   256   GB  SSDS    FOR  A  TOATAL   OF   512  GB  OF  FLASH  MEMORY    IF  YOU  DONT  MIND  A  RAID   0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 901</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[901]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i just found out - 6.8lb for the 2008 model and 6.6 for the 09 model.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just found out &#8211; 6.8lb for the 2008 model and 6.6 for the 09 model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 901</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[901]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey, what is the weight comparaison between the old 17&quot; and the new 17&quot; mac pro?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, what is the weight comparaison between the old 17&#8243; and the new 17&#8243; mac pro?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan S</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget to mention the new &#039;all-digital&#039; DRM strategy that locks out analog video via the displayport, and is going to &#039;content protect&#039; output.

As ticked off as I am about this, I&#039;m likely to buy one of these anyway.  Sad but true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget to mention the new &#8216;all-digital&#8217; DRM strategy that locks out analog video via the displayport, and is going to &#8216;content protect&#8217; output.</p>
<p>As ticked off as I am about this, I&#8217;m likely to buy one of these anyway.  Sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james braselton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james braselton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI  THERE  FORGET  YOU  WANT  TOO  GET  MORE  THEN  256  GB  SSD  JUST  WAIT  UNTILL  2010  WHEN  APPLE  WILL UPGRADE  TOO  A  320  512   OR  1 TERABYTE  TB  SSD  BUT  MY  LAPTOP  IS  A G4  IBOOK  IT  ONLY  HAS  1.44  GHZ  CPU  SINGLE  CORE  512 MB  OF  RAM  AND  I  HAVE  USED  2/3  OF  THE  RAM  AND   ONLY  HAS  A  60  GB  HARD  DRIVE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI  THERE  FORGET  YOU  WANT  TOO  GET  MORE  THEN  256  GB  SSD  JUST  WAIT  UNTILL  2010  WHEN  APPLE  WILL UPGRADE  TOO  A  320  512   OR  1 TERABYTE  TB  SSD  BUT  MY  LAPTOP  IS  A G4  IBOOK  IT  ONLY  HAS  1.44  GHZ  CPU  SINGLE  CORE  512 MB  OF  RAM  AND  I  HAVE  USED  2/3  OF  THE  RAM  AND   ONLY  HAS  A  60  GB  HARD  DRIVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james braselton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james braselton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI   THERE   COMPARING  THE  OLD  VERSES  THE  NEW  I  WILL   GET   THE  17  INCH  MACBOOOK  PRO  WITH  2.93  GHZ   DUO  CORE  CPU  8  GB  OF  RAM  AND   THE  256  GB   SSD  DRIVE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI   THERE   COMPARING  THE  OLD  VERSES  THE  NEW  I  WILL   GET   THE  17  INCH  MACBOOOK  PRO  WITH  2.93  GHZ   DUO  CORE  CPU  8  GB  OF  RAM  AND   THE  256  GB   SSD  DRIVE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Wood</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The absolute best news from the keynote is the availability of a matte screen. Now I can finally think about an iMac without reflections.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The absolute best news from the keynote is the availability of a matte screen. Now I can finally think about an iMac without reflections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macworld Day 2: The Best is Yet to Come &#124; TheAppleBlog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Macworld Day 2: The Best is Yet to Come &#124; TheAppleBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and iWork.com have promise and add some great new features. Eight hours of battery life from a 17&#8243; laptop still blows my mind. There was lots of cool stuff to get excited [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and iWork.com have promise and add some great new features. Eight hours of battery life from a 17&#8243; laptop still blows my mind. There was lots of cool stuff to get excited [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweets</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sweets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ill give a laptop to the first person with a link to that peacock photo.......nothing on when ill give you the laptop...but someday..yea....

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ill give a laptop to the first person with a link to that peacock photo&#8230;&#8230;.nothing on when ill give you the laptop&#8230;but someday..yea&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Rubenstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Rubenstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ditto on the peacock background. Def want it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto on the peacock background. Def want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melissa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear god is that ever a gorgeous peacock pic.

Please forgive me for skipping over the context and asking: where I can get that photo for my background? :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear god is that ever a gorgeous peacock pic.</p>
<p>Please forgive me for skipping over the context and asking: where I can get that photo for my background? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s too bad Apple feels that Blu-ray is a &quot;bag of hurt&quot;.  That&#039;s one feature it is missing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad Apple feels that Blu-ray is a &#8220;bag of hurt&#8221;.  That&#8217;s one feature it is missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/comparing-new-to-old-apple-17-macbook-pro-is-sweet/#comment-337920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14498#comment-337920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s great, not that I&#039;ll be buying one.

Memory and Hard Drive are accessed by the 8 tiny screw (Phillips #00, like on the 15&quot;) on the bottom. It&#039;s the same way RAM is accessed on the other models. It&#039;s probably a better idea, too, since how often do you replace your hard drive? I&#039;ll bet that these are user-replaceable parts too, since they&#039;re likely in the same place as the other notebooks. Wonder what they did with the extra room in the case though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great, not that I&#8217;ll be buying one.</p>
<p>Memory and Hard Drive are accessed by the 8 tiny screw (Phillips #00, like on the 15&#8243;) on the bottom. It&#8217;s the same way RAM is accessed on the other models. It&#8217;s probably a better idea, too, since how often do you replace your hard drive? I&#8217;ll bet that these are user-replaceable parts too, since they&#8217;re likely in the same place as the other notebooks. Wonder what they did with the extra room in the case though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

