<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s New Ads: Fantastic in Lots of Little Ways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 15:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: turtle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turtle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they&#039;ll say &#039;oh cool, more protection.  i was afraid i could get a virus&#039;.

your argument is stupid.  like my english.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;ll say &#8216;oh cool, more protection.  i was afraid i could get a virus&#8217;.</p>
<p>your argument is stupid.  like my english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turtle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turtle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[really, no one cares.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really, no one cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what are u trying to say w/ ur comment? I&#039;m missing the point here...

I stated my opinion on the shitty ad. Sure puddy is funny, but that doesn&#039;t excuse the lame idea behind the ad 1 bit. I also stated that use OSX, so what ARE you trying to say man. Nothing obviously.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are u trying to say w/ ur comment? I&#8217;m missing the point here&#8230;</p>
<p>I stated my opinion on the shitty ad. Sure puddy is funny, but that doesn&#8217;t excuse the lame idea behind the ad 1 bit. I also stated that use OSX, so what ARE you trying to say man. Nothing obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey Apple fan boys, get a load of this caz ur gonna shit urselves:

http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/08/25/1839246/Report-That-OS-X-Snow-Leopard-May-Include-Antivirus

even though it&#039;s just a rumor for now, but if it is true and SL is shipping with an ANTIVIRUS, ur pompous replies are numbered. That may explain why Apple is trying to quickly ship out ALL the tired &quot;no viruses on macs&quot; adds. I wonder what the regular consumer is gonna say when they find out that SL has an antivirus, lol

oh boy, this is gonna be so funny. Can you predict what the next add is NOT gonna be if this is true?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Apple fan boys, get a load of this caz ur gonna shit urselves:</p>
<p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/08/25/1839246/Report-That-OS-X-Snow-Leopard-May-Include-Antivirus" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/08/25/1839246/Report-That-OS-X-Snow-Leopard-May-Include-Antivirus</a></p>
<p>even though it&#8217;s just a rumor for now, but if it is true and SL is shipping with an ANTIVIRUS, ur pompous replies are numbered. That may explain why Apple is trying to quickly ship out ALL the tired &#8220;no viruses on macs&#8221; adds. I wonder what the regular consumer is gonna say when they find out that SL has an antivirus, lol</p>
<p>oh boy, this is gonna be so funny. Can you predict what the next add is NOT gonna be if this is true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrochimp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astrochimp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kiko:

Thanks!

Oh, that&#039;s interesting, but not nearly as effective as what Vista and Windows 7 do. IMO Apple would serve customers to imitate Microsoft, but probably it decided that it can&#039;t imitate Microsoft without looking really, really bad; that would wreck it&#039;s carefull-cultivated image as &quot;innovative&quot;, and fly in the face of the constant Microsoft-bashing.

Apple customers lose. That&#039;s sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kiko:</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Oh, that&#8217;s interesting, but not nearly as effective as what Vista and Windows 7 do. IMO Apple would serve customers to imitate Microsoft, but probably it decided that it can&#8217;t imitate Microsoft without looking really, really bad; that would wreck it&#8217;s carefull-cultivated image as &#8220;innovative&#8221;, and fly in the face of the constant Microsoft-bashing.</p>
<p>Apple customers lose. That&#8217;s sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiko</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Astrochimp

I don&#039;t have a copy of Snow Leopard yet so I couldn&#039;t tell you, but Reuters did have this article regarding installation.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/25/snow_leopard_malware_protection/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Astrochimp</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a copy of Snow Leopard yet so I couldn&#8217;t tell you, but Reuters did have this article regarding installation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/25/snow_leopard_malware_protection/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/25/snow_leopard_malware_protection/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrochimp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astrochimp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kiko; Thank you, good comments!

On Brad Brooks: yes, but that&#039;s not nearly as clear-cut as the direct Apple lies about security and stability of the competition. Your example is closer to what all companies do to sell their products: hype them! I don&#039;t at all see that as a try to get customers to run a Windows OS, although Mac fanboys will take any (any!) excuse to attribute malice to that evil,evil Microsoft :)

On Mac users in general: I think you give them too much credit. There are well-informed and smart people such as yourself out there, but generally I experience Mac fandom as a cultish following, not open to reason or (horrors!) facts.

On Conficker: I&#039;ll clarify my earlier point: this was reverse-engineered from a Microsoft patch for a vulnerability which Microsoft found.

It&#039;s possible you guys honestly don&#039;t know about one of the advanced security features that Vista has, which Snow Leopard would serve customers well to emulate (like ASLR, which Vista shipped long ago): digital signatures at elevation-of-privelege time when installing software.

Question: does Snow Leopard do this? If I install an application from e.g. Adobe, at elevation-of-privilege time, does Mac tell me whether the EXE is digitally signed, and if so, by whom?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kiko; Thank you, good comments!</p>
<p>On Brad Brooks: yes, but that&#8217;s not nearly as clear-cut as the direct Apple lies about security and stability of the competition. Your example is closer to what all companies do to sell their products: hype them! I don&#8217;t at all see that as a try to get customers to run a Windows OS, although Mac fanboys will take any (any!) excuse to attribute malice to that evil,evil Microsoft :)</p>
<p>On Mac users in general: I think you give them too much credit. There are well-informed and smart people such as yourself out there, but generally I experience Mac fandom as a cultish following, not open to reason or (horrors!) facts.</p>
<p>On Conficker: I&#8217;ll clarify my earlier point: this was reverse-engineered from a Microsoft patch for a vulnerability which Microsoft found.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible you guys honestly don&#8217;t know about one of the advanced security features that Vista has, which Snow Leopard would serve customers well to emulate (like ASLR, which Vista shipped long ago): digital signatures at elevation-of-privelege time when installing software.</p>
<p>Question: does Snow Leopard do this? If I install an application from e.g. Adobe, at elevation-of-privilege time, does Mac tell me whether the EXE is digitally signed, and if so, by whom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwall_hp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redwall_hp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll admit it&#039;s not the best marketing tactic. (And I&#039;ve never liked Apple&#039;s claims that their computers aren&#039;t PCs, despite their x86 architecture) However,&lt;em&gt;where is the malware?&lt;/em&gt; Other than a couple of trojans, which require an admin password to install, there haven&#039;t really been any major epidemics of Mac malware. Compare that with the drive-by installs of Antivirus2009 (or whatever it calls itself now) that get past most scanners, and the botnets like Storm and Conficker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll admit it&#8217;s not the best marketing tactic. (And I&#8217;ve never liked Apple&#8217;s claims that their computers aren&#8217;t PCs, despite their x86 architecture) However,<em>where is the malware?</em> Other than a couple of trojans, which require an admin password to install, there haven&#8217;t really been any major epidemics of Mac malware. Compare that with the drive-by installs of Antivirus2009 (or whatever it calls itself now) that get past most scanners, and the botnets like Storm and Conficker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiko</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Astrochimp: Although you may feel strongly about this issue, an Apple blog is not the place to discuss it - for one, Apple users aren&#039;t going to care what you have to say as it&#039;s nothing short of trolling. In my opinion, you could gain the attention of a wider audience by writing an article or notifying a publisher on Salon.com for example.

I sit here with my Macbook connected to my ASUS 1080p monitor. Compatibility with hardware isn&#039;t a problem.

In terms of Apple and their consumers being &quot;ignorant,&quot; Mac users are very well aware of the security flaws in their products, and deal with them accordingly. In terms of Apple being &quot;told&quot; to release security updates, we have a community that notifies Apple to relevant problems. Microsoft isn&#039;t always on their A game either, and also has a community of like minded individuals who are dedicated and passionate about securing their products. We don&#039;t know what is happening at Apple HQ, and developers may have decided to release a patch that encompasses many security issues instead of just one, thus the delay. As Apple continues to become a larger target for malware in the years ahead, they will take the appropriate measures to make their software safe to use.

Microsoft does mislead their consumers. I remember Brad Brooks being a prime example of admittedly selling Microsoft Office 2008 on the Mac lacking features of it&#039;s Windows counterpart when it was being sold as a &quot;fully featured&quot; office solution. That&#039;s shady tactics to get Mac users to switch over to Windows just for an office suite that has everything available.

No matter what operating system you use, all are vulnerable to an extent. It is ultimately the user, not the operating system, who needs to take precautions and be aware of what website he or she visits, what links are safe to click on, what emails are safe to open, and what not to download in order to avoid any breach in security.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Astrochimp: Although you may feel strongly about this issue, an Apple blog is not the place to discuss it &#8211; for one, Apple users aren&#8217;t going to care what you have to say as it&#8217;s nothing short of trolling. In my opinion, you could gain the attention of a wider audience by writing an article or notifying a publisher on Salon.com for example.</p>
<p>I sit here with my Macbook connected to my ASUS 1080p monitor. Compatibility with hardware isn&#8217;t a problem.</p>
<p>In terms of Apple and their consumers being &#8220;ignorant,&#8221; Mac users are very well aware of the security flaws in their products, and deal with them accordingly. In terms of Apple being &#8220;told&#8221; to release security updates, we have a community that notifies Apple to relevant problems. Microsoft isn&#8217;t always on their A game either, and also has a community of like minded individuals who are dedicated and passionate about securing their products. We don&#8217;t know what is happening at Apple HQ, and developers may have decided to release a patch that encompasses many security issues instead of just one, thus the delay. As Apple continues to become a larger target for malware in the years ahead, they will take the appropriate measures to make their software safe to use.</p>
<p>Microsoft does mislead their consumers. I remember Brad Brooks being a prime example of admittedly selling Microsoft Office 2008 on the Mac lacking features of it&#8217;s Windows counterpart when it was being sold as a &#8220;fully featured&#8221; office solution. That&#8217;s shady tactics to get Mac users to switch over to Windows just for an office suite that has everything available.</p>
<p>No matter what operating system you use, all are vulnerable to an extent. It is ultimately the user, not the operating system, who needs to take precautions and be aware of what website he or she visits, what links are safe to click on, what emails are safe to open, and what not to download in order to avoid any breach in security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrochimp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apples-new-ads-lots-of-little-fantastic/#comment-355222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astrochimp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=31344#comment-355222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Catmanrog: I feel like I just told you that, so sorry, there is no Santa Claus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Catmanrog: I feel like I just told you that, so sorry, there is no Santa Claus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

