Comments on: Apple updates press release boilerplate

By: Analyzing Apple’s Boilerplate :NewsPress.me

Analyzing Apple’s Boilerplate :NewsPress.me — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:01:16 +0000

[...] evolved and released products such as the iPod and iPhone, the boilerplate evolved. Actually, we made a post about this in 2007 shortly before the first iPhone shipped analyzing how the boilerplate has [...]

By: Analyzing Apple’s Boilerplate « Apple News Daily

Analyzing Apple’s Boilerplate « Apple News Daily — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:05:51 +0000

By: Adam Jackson

Adam Jackson — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:00:00 +0000

Agreed. XServe was and is a phenomenal product. It was expensive but I believe has a place in most markets. I used to have an XServe G4 1.33Ghz running my home network w/ open directory, mail server and Time Machine backups to a few drives for all of my computers. It was too loud for my house but I loved it.

Apple has pretty much abandoned that market and it shows.

By: Adam Jackson

Adam Jackson — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:58:17 +0000

Stu. This is Apple's marketing and your argument also remains true for Apple's claim that the iPad is magical.

We can argue it but Apple sticks to these claims.

I'd take it one step further where at the release of Apple's 15" Titanium PowerBook in 2000, it was a single core Motorola G4 running at 450Mhz. The marketing claim was, "it's a portable supercomputer." because it happened to hit 1 teraflop or something like that in processing power when actually it was still just a laptop w/ a mobile chip.

so try not to read too much into Apple's "revolutionary" claim.

By: Analyzing Apple’s Boilerplate | The Iphone Blog

Analyzing Apple’s Boilerplate | The Iphone Blog — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:01:38 +0000

By: Do you know what the first Apple looked like? at The Apple Blog

Do you know what the first Apple looked like? at The Apple Blog — Tue, 08 May 2007 23:42:20 +0000

[...] 200 of the Apple I motherboards were made before the Apple II was introduced in 1977 and (as Apple still notes in all their press releases) “ignited the personal computer revolution in the [...]

By: Stu

Stu — Tue, 01 May 2007 03:18:43 +0000

Wait, it’s a revolutionary phone?

The real kind of revolutionary phone, or the poseur kind that just wears a Che Guevara t-shirt and talks about being a revolutionary phone?

By: Frank

Frank — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:45:31 +0000

There was a while there where “businesses” and “scientists” was also in the list of Apple customers. It’s amazing how readily they’ve abandoned the enterprise (except for legacy education customers).

But world-class server products don’t tend to land CEOs on the cover of TIME magazine, so why bother? :)