<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Conference Call: Yes on &#8220;Pro,&#8221; Cannibalizing iPods, No on Netbooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could A Dockable iPhone Be A Better Netbook?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-352000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Could A Dockable iPhone Be A Better Netbook?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-352000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] product category. While Microsoft has a complicated relationship with the netbook phenomenon, and Apple is downright contemptuous, consumers voted with their wallets and made the netbook the hottest-selling category in computers. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] product category. While Microsoft has a complicated relationship with the netbook phenomenon, and Apple is downright contemptuous, consumers voted with their wallets and made the netbook the hottest-selling category in computers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 06:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am quite happy with my dell mini 9 hackint0sh. I do everything I normally do on my iMac (code, analyze stats, watch movies, listen to music/radio...) and I don&#039;t have to break my back with a 5lb laptop (its roughly 2lbs). Apple is missing the point of the usefulness of netbooks. It&#039;s not about how much horse power you can pack into a tiny package. It has to be functional. If the proof of concept of hackint0sh netbooks haven&#039;t persuaded Apple of the usefulness of OSX on a1.6GHz Atom with 2GB ram, then they are just blind and greedy. They are obviously not going to cannibalize their current 13&quot; Pro or the soon-to-be-extinct Air. For Apple to start making a tiny Mac and sell it at $400-500 would be disaster since their phone costs more than that ($800 no contract). Basically, it is impossible for Apple to make a netbook and to justify a low price. If they made one, it would be expensive and wouldn&#039;t sell. So you keep hearing the stupid excuse about shoddy parts, cramped keyboard (it&#039;s not thaaaaat bad), etc. So that&#039;s my take on the Apple&#039;s stance and netbooks. If they trim their lineup and make a subsidized netbook (like some companies sell the Dell mini 9 along with a 3G stick subscription), they might make some money.


A tablet would be good for reading (it would be a kindle and Sony ebook reader killer) and maybe video editing (unless it&#039;s got an Atom, but image typing on it. How are you going to hold it while you stand waiting for a bus? Are you proficient with one hand (well, maybe a dumb question, caz you might be)? At a coffee shop, are you going to lay it flap and bend over it just to see the screen without distortion? Regardless, a tablet only seems cool. But you soon realize that everything you can do on it, your iPhone or iPod touch or my netbook can do and does it better. It&#039;s an unnecessary expense during this economy without which most can definitely survive (not fanboys though). I predict that this will be a flop unless they pull some crazy shtuff with it.

My 2 pennies.

Mister]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite happy with my dell mini 9 hackint0sh. I do everything I normally do on my iMac (code, analyze stats, watch movies, listen to music/radio&#8230;) and I don&#8217;t have to break my back with a 5lb laptop (its roughly 2lbs). Apple is missing the point of the usefulness of netbooks. It&#8217;s not about how much horse power you can pack into a tiny package. It has to be functional. If the proof of concept of hackint0sh netbooks haven&#8217;t persuaded Apple of the usefulness of OSX on a1.6GHz Atom with 2GB ram, then they are just blind and greedy. They are obviously not going to cannibalize their current 13&#8243; Pro or the soon-to-be-extinct Air. For Apple to start making a tiny Mac and sell it at $400-500 would be disaster since their phone costs more than that ($800 no contract). Basically, it is impossible for Apple to make a netbook and to justify a low price. If they made one, it would be expensive and wouldn&#8217;t sell. So you keep hearing the stupid excuse about shoddy parts, cramped keyboard (it&#8217;s not thaaaaat bad), etc. So that&#8217;s my take on the Apple&#8217;s stance and netbooks. If they trim their lineup and make a subsidized netbook (like some companies sell the Dell mini 9 along with a 3G stick subscription), they might make some money.</p>
<p>A tablet would be good for reading (it would be a kindle and Sony ebook reader killer) and maybe video editing (unless it&#8217;s got an Atom, but image typing on it. How are you going to hold it while you stand waiting for a bus? Are you proficient with one hand (well, maybe a dumb question, caz you might be)? At a coffee shop, are you going to lay it flap and bend over it just to see the screen without distortion? Regardless, a tablet only seems cool. But you soon realize that everything you can do on it, your iPhone or iPod touch or my netbook can do and does it better. It&#8217;s an unnecessary expense during this economy without which most can definitely survive (not fanboys though). I predict that this will be a flop unless they pull some crazy shtuff with it.</p>
<p>My 2 pennies.</p>
<p>Mister</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple, Foxconn Comment on Worker&#8217;s Death</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple, Foxconn Comment on Worker&#8217;s Death]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] may have been Apple&#8217;s quarterly earnings conference call, but its financial performance was somewhat overshadowed by the tragic death of a worker at an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may have been Apple&#8217;s quarterly earnings conference call, but its financial performance was somewhat overshadowed by the tragic death of a worker at an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the decline ipods (classic) the main reason why I bought the classic over touch after my previous one died was storage. I would rather have 120 GB of storage than 32, especially for the long trips and commutes I go on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the decline ipods (classic) the main reason why I bought the classic over touch after my previous one died was storage. I would rather have 120 GB of storage than 32, especially for the long trips and commutes I go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ditchdoc68</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ditchdoc68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Apple is &#039;cannibalizing&#039; itself, what does that make Apple..... a cannibal or a vegetarian?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple is &#8216;cannibalizing&#8217; itself, what does that make Apple&#8230;.. a cannibal or a vegetarian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Cannibalization&quot; isn&#039;t so much a metaphor but a very common and long-standing business term. Still, it&#039;s interesting that Apple is alright with iPod touches and iPhones stealing market share from traditional iPods... it probably aligns with their long-term strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cannibalization&#8221; isn&#8217;t so much a metaphor but a very common and long-standing business term. Still, it&#8217;s interesting that Apple is alright with iPod touches and iPhones stealing market share from traditional iPods&#8230; it probably aligns with their long-term strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vox</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to, regretfully, agree with James Dempsey...24hr battery life? on a tablet? with 3G? not only no, but hell no! Not in any tablet you&#039;d be able to carry with you (never mind willing to...just able to).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to, regretfully, agree with James Dempsey&#8230;24hr battery life? on a tablet? with 3G? not only no, but hell no! Not in any tablet you&#8217;d be able to carry with you (never mind willing to&#8230;just able to).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dempsey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Dempsey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24-hour battery life on a large screen tablet with &quot;full-time&quot; (assuming you mean &quot;always-on&quot;) connection - LMAO!!!! I would love a million dollars... and I think I **might** have a better chance  at getting it than you do of getting that device! ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24-hour battery life on a large screen tablet with &#8220;full-time&#8221; (assuming you mean &#8220;always-on&#8221;) connection &#8211; LMAO!!!! I would love a million dollars&#8230; and I think I **might** have a better chance  at getting it than you do of getting that device! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Numerius Negidius</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Numerius Negidius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want an iTablet.  

The current iPhone and iTouch are nice, but the screen is too small for serious reading of web surfing, the battery wears out quickly, and there&#039;s not enough storage for my music collection - let alone movies and photos.  Also, my employer already provides me with a Blackberry, and I don&#039;t need another phone.  

I want my iTablet to have a full-time 3G Internet connection, lots of storage (256GB+), and long battery life (24 hours+).  I&#039;m don&#039;t really care about the purchase price, as long as the monthly service fee is low.  

I&#039;ll have my entire library of books on it, and I&#039;ll re-subscribe to magazines and newspapers which I let lapse due to all the unwanted stacks of paper.  I&#039;ll download the movies on my &quot;wish list&quot;, and take my entire music and photo collection with me everywhere I go.

I&#039;ll have it with me in the living room when I watch TV, and I&#039;ll curl up in bed with it for late night reading.  When I go out, I&#039;ll put it in my bag, in the space formerly occupied by books and magazines.  I&#039;ll use it for reading on the train while I listen to my favorite tunes.  I&#039;ll check email at work.  When I&#039;m planning with friends, I&#039;ll use it to find movie listings, maps, and restaurant reviews. I&#039;ll use it to play a game or watch a movie when I&#039;m killing time at the airport or on a long flight.  

When can I have it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want an iTablet.  </p>
<p>The current iPhone and iTouch are nice, but the screen is too small for serious reading of web surfing, the battery wears out quickly, and there&#8217;s not enough storage for my music collection &#8211; let alone movies and photos.  Also, my employer already provides me with a Blackberry, and I don&#8217;t need another phone.  </p>
<p>I want my iTablet to have a full-time 3G Internet connection, lots of storage (256GB+), and long battery life (24 hours+).  I&#8217;m don&#8217;t really care about the purchase price, as long as the monthly service fee is low.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have my entire library of books on it, and I&#8217;ll re-subscribe to magazines and newspapers which I let lapse due to all the unwanted stacks of paper.  I&#8217;ll download the movies on my &#8220;wish list&#8221;, and take my entire music and photo collection with me everywhere I go.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have it with me in the living room when I watch TV, and I&#8217;ll curl up in bed with it for late night reading.  When I go out, I&#8217;ll put it in my bag, in the space formerly occupied by books and magazines.  I&#8217;ll use it for reading on the train while I listen to my favorite tunes.  I&#8217;ll check email at work.  When I&#8217;m planning with friends, I&#8217;ll use it to find movie listings, maps, and restaurant reviews. I&#8217;ll use it to play a game or watch a movie when I&#8217;m killing time at the airport or on a long flight.  </p>
<p>When can I have it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagpotter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-conference-call-yes-on-pro-cannibalizing-ipods-no-on-netbooks/#comment-351991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dagpotter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=28672#comment-351991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After carrying around my HP notebook for a trip I wouldn&#039;t trade it for my full sized laptop.  At about 5 lbs with the power supply it still worked for my writing as it has a 90% solution keyboard.  Technically I can do the work I need on my iPhone but it wouldn&#039;t be anywhere as easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After carrying around my HP notebook for a trip I wouldn&#8217;t trade it for my full sized laptop.  At about 5 lbs with the power supply it still worked for my writing as it has a 90% solution keyboard.  Technically I can do the work I need on my iPhone but it wouldn&#8217;t be anywhere as easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

