<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Backs Down in Syncing Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-backs-down-in-syncing-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-backs-down-in-syncing-lawsuit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-backs-down-in-syncing-lawsuit/#comment-352511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=29090#comment-352511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[actually it is not yet decided  if what Apple did is wrong. because no one has said that Apple can not tie itunes to its products. so long as permission is implied and not contested then Apple very likely is in the right on the songbird/pre fronts. because these folks did circumvent the software locks that Apple currently has the right to have in place. much like the whole Psystar issue. 

what is needed is for someone to drop copyright for the moment and hit Apple with an antitrust suit claiming that due to the ipod strength in the portable digital music player market, such tying is abusive. then when Apple loses they will have no choice but to allow folks like Palm, Songbird etc to do the syncing via itunes. at least  of non DRM items.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually it is not yet decided  if what Apple did is wrong. because no one has said that Apple can not tie itunes to its products. so long as permission is implied and not contested then Apple very likely is in the right on the songbird/pre fronts. because these folks did circumvent the software locks that Apple currently has the right to have in place. much like the whole Psystar issue. </p>
<p>what is needed is for someone to drop copyright for the moment and hit Apple with an antitrust suit claiming that due to the ipod strength in the portable digital music player market, such tying is abusive. then when Apple loses they will have no choice but to allow folks like Palm, Songbird etc to do the syncing via itunes. at least  of non DRM items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Jade</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-backs-down-in-syncing-lawsuit/#comment-352510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Jade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=29090#comment-352510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that Apple protecting itself by acting inappropriately with Bluwiki reflects badly on appropriate actions against Palm. It&#039;s the kind of overbearing attitude that gets the likes of the US DOJ or, worse, the EU to force hardware interoperability between players, and you can bet Apple doesn&#039;t want that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Apple protecting itself by acting inappropriately with Bluwiki reflects badly on appropriate actions against Palm. It&#8217;s the kind of overbearing attitude that gets the likes of the US DOJ or, worse, the EU to force hardware interoperability between players, and you can bet Apple doesn&#8217;t want that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-backs-down-in-syncing-lawsuit/#comment-352509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=29090#comment-352509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is everyone so upset over Apple trying to protect it&#039;s products/technology??  Like with the Pre... why should Apple provide something for it&#039;s competitors?  If the palm wants their customers to be able to sync up their phones... then palm should make something of their own.  and I hope they do it fast for their sake.  I know several sprint customers that were fooled into buying an pre and now they are so envious of my 3G S.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone so upset over Apple trying to protect it&#8217;s products/technology??  Like with the Pre&#8230; why should Apple provide something for it&#8217;s competitors?  If the palm wants their customers to be able to sync up their phones&#8230; then palm should make something of their own.  and I hope they do it fast for their sake.  I know several sprint customers that were fooled into buying an pre and now they are so envious of my 3G S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

