<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple and Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apple Blog &#187; Apple and Intel, &#8216;Official&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/#comment-306335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Apple Blog &#187; Apple and Intel, &#8216;Official&#8217;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 05:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/05/23/apple-and-intel/#comment-306335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  favour of Intel.  	Now the rumors fly regularly, and I&#8217;ve covered the recent rumors here.  	CNet claim it&#8217;s official, yet everybody invovled has denied that anything i [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  favour of Intel.  	Now the rumors fly regularly, and I&#8217;ve covered the recent rumors here.  	CNet claim it&#8217;s official, yet everybody invovled has denied that anything i [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/#comment-306336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 00:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/05/23/apple-and-intel/#comment-306336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as I can tell, this just stinks of rumor. Would Apple switch chips and lose the Velocity Engine? I don&#039;t think so. Besides, the story came from the Wall Street Journal, a bunch of white collar Bill Gates kissing idiots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell, this just stinks of rumor. Would Apple switch chips and lose the Velocity Engine? I don&#8217;t think so. Besides, the story came from the Wall Street Journal, a bunch of white collar Bill Gates kissing idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twist</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/#comment-306337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 20:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/05/23/apple-and-intel/#comment-306337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM doesn&#039;t manufacture anything for Apple besides chips so citing the tablet patent as proof is pretty weak. Chances are they would pass the manufacturing of a tablet on to one of the same companies that already handles the Powerbooks or iBooks.

Personally I think they should take a nice long look at the Cell processor. If Sony hasn&#039;t over-hyped it to the extreme that they normally over-hype their products then it is one heck of a processor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM doesn&#8217;t manufacture anything for Apple besides chips so citing the tablet patent as proof is pretty weak. Chances are they would pass the manufacturing of a tablet on to one of the same companies that already handles the Powerbooks or iBooks.</p>
<p>Personally I think they should take a nice long look at the Cell processor. If Sony hasn&#8217;t over-hyped it to the extreme that they normally over-hype their products then it is one heck of a processor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i-am-an-elf</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/#comment-306340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[i-am-an-elf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/05/23/apple-and-intel/#comment-306340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to let you guys know, this intel thing and apple is true. IBM doesn&#039;t manufacture a Tablet PC or Palm Pilot Processor.

http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5729/

WWDC Maybe?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you guys know, this intel thing and apple is true. IBM doesn&#8217;t manufacture a Tablet PC or Palm Pilot Processor.</p>
<p><a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5729/" rel="nofollow">http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5729/</a></p>
<p>WWDC Maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/#comment-306339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 18:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/05/23/apple-and-intel/#comment-306339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, i guess I need some proofreading too :)

least]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, i guess I need some proofreading too :)</p>
<p>least</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-and-intel/#comment-306338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 18:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/05/23/apple-and-intel/#comment-306338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Apple have been frustrated, to say the list, with the recent performance of PowerPC processors.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Common guys let&#039;s work a little harder at proofreading.

&lt;b&gt;Apple &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; been frustrated, to say the &lt;i&gt;lease&lt;/i&gt;, with the recent performance of PowerPC processors.
&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Apple have been frustrated, to say the list, with the recent performance of PowerPC processors.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Common guys let&#8217;s work a little harder at proofreading.</p>
<p><b>Apple <i>has</i> been frustrated, to say the <i>lease</i>, with the recent performance of PowerPC processors.<br />
</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

