<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis of a Rumor: Large Format iPod Touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWDC 2009: Rumor Round-Up Ahead of the Big Show</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WWDC 2009: Rumor Round-Up Ahead of the Big Show]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to deliver one. Just give us a really big iPod touch. That&#8217;s all we&#8217;re asking for. We know you have one lying around, anyway. Put it into production. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to deliver one. Just give us a really big iPod touch. That&#8217;s all we&#8217;re asking for. We know you have one lying around, anyway. Put it into production. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freetouch</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[freetouch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[loving this added to my blog and im going to twitter this now :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loving this added to my blog and im going to twitter this now :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple News &#187; WWDC 2009: Rumor Round-Up Ahead of the Big Show</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple News &#187; WWDC 2009: Rumor Round-Up Ahead of the Big Show]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to deliver one. Just give us a really big iPod touch. That&#8217;s all we&#8217;re asking for. We know you have one lying around, anyway. Put it into production. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to deliver one. Just give us a really big iPod touch. That&#8217;s all we&#8217;re asking for. We know you have one lying around, anyway. Put it into production. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Points Of Interest: OpenMoko&#8217;s Android, 9 inch iPod, Hewlett&#8217;s Atom, Apple&#8217;s internet, paid Android apps, and Google Mobile suggestions&#160;&#124;&#160;GPS Obsessed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Points Of Interest: OpenMoko&#8217;s Android, 9 inch iPod, Hewlett&#8217;s Atom, Apple&#8217;s internet, paid Android apps, and Google Mobile suggestions&#160;&#124;&#160;GPS Obsessed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Apple has a large format&#8211;7 to 9 inch&#8211;iPod Touch in the works.  Rumors are rumors, but The Apple Blog has a great analysis putting forth an argument of why the rumor could be plausible.  Taking into account an unnamed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple has a large format&#8211;7 to 9 inch&#8211;iPod Touch in the works.  Rumors are rumors, but The Apple Blog has a great analysis putting forth an argument of why the rumor could be plausible.  Taking into account an unnamed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picturing a 9-inch iPod tablet - Apple 2.0 - The thing about common sense&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Picturing a 9-inch iPod tablet - Apple 2.0 - The thing about common sense&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Analysis of a Rumor: Large Format iPod Touch Written on December 31, 2008 by Darrell Etherington and 5 people have commented [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Analysis of a Rumor: Large Format iPod Touch Written on December 31, 2008 by Darrell Etherington and 5 people have commented [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacSheikh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacSheikh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 06:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Newton...Reborn. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Newton&#8230;Reborn. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FuzzyTig</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FuzzyTig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about a pad for accessing the web, etc. via Apple TV; and a built in DVD/BD player would be nice.

We wouldn&#039;t have to leave the couch to load DVDs, browse the web, access our music, online video, etc. all on our brand new HD TV.  We could even be looking at real HighDef like folks get with their over-the-air broadcasts.

Better than the ATV might even a two component system with the ATV software operating on a NAS/Media center device communicating with the couch portal -- sort of like a MacBook without the screen, and storing all of our multimedia right at the TV/Stereo.

Sounds way to doable to be even possible, doesn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a pad for accessing the web, etc. via Apple TV; and a built in DVD/BD player would be nice.</p>
<p>We wouldn&#8217;t have to leave the couch to load DVDs, browse the web, access our music, online video, etc. all on our brand new HD TV.  We could even be looking at real HighDef like folks get with their over-the-air broadcasts.</p>
<p>Better than the ATV might even a two component system with the ATV software operating on a NAS/Media center device communicating with the couch portal &#8212; sort of like a MacBook without the screen, and storing all of our multimedia right at the TV/Stereo.</p>
<p>Sounds way to doable to be even possible, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The larger iPod Touch must still be pocketable. The “concept” is a Mac that we have with us all the time, everywhere we go. I simply won’t buy another mobile Mac that I have to lug in a case. And imagine what an anywhere, anytime Mac can feature as services!

Nor should anyone have to buy more than one Mac. So the “MacTROU” (for The Rest of Us) must be untethered, like the Kindle, using EVDO. And better than the Kindle, this gizmo connects to all your files on MobileMe.

Apple can charge whatever it needs to for the mobile Mac, for the connectivity, and for a subscription to MobileMe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The larger iPod Touch must still be pocketable. The “concept” is a Mac that we have with us all the time, everywhere we go. I simply won’t buy another mobile Mac that I have to lug in a case. And imagine what an anywhere, anytime Mac can feature as services!</p>
<p>Nor should anyone have to buy more than one Mac. So the “MacTROU” (for The Rest of Us) must be untethered, like the Kindle, using EVDO. And better than the Kindle, this gizmo connects to all your files on MobileMe.</p>
<p>Apple can charge whatever it needs to for the mobile Mac, for the connectivity, and for a subscription to MobileMe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffalo John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buffalo John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hopefully, it will allow data to be saved to the device!  Unlike the current iPod touch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, it will allow data to be saved to the device!  Unlike the current iPod touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campbell Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/analysis-of-a-rumor-large-format-ipod-touch/#comment-337760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=14236#comment-337760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple Newton?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple Newton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

