<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9to5Mac Claims Next Gen Nano Leak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought my new battery at needbattery.com
http://www.needbattery.com/Mp3-Players/Apple.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my new battery at needbattery.com<br />
<a href="http://www.needbattery.com/Mp3-Players/Apple.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.needbattery.com/Mp3-Players/Apple.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[milly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they were right apple did announce these new ipod]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they were right apple did announce these new ipod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catrame</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catrame]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[100% ugly!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% ugly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that what we are seeing is the replacement for the current video model.  These will be available in 16GB and 32GB.  There will also be a touchscreen model that will run $50-100 more.  These will be flash-based as well.  It&#039;s likely this higher-end model will have Wi-Fi and may allow streaming of content from your LAN.  This content will either be your own library, or possibly a subscription service.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that what we are seeing is the replacement for the current video model.  These will be available in 16GB and 32GB.  There will also be a touchscreen model that will run $50-100 more.  These will be flash-based as well.  It&#8217;s likely this higher-end model will have Wi-Fi and may allow streaming of content from your LAN.  This content will either be your own library, or possibly a subscription service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Radel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Radel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohhh...Apple made them take &#039;em down. That&#039;s interesting. I don&#039;t recall that ever happening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh&#8230;Apple made them take &#8216;em down. That&#8217;s interesting. I don&#8217;t recall that ever happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Anderson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything&#039;s possible. The leaked photos of the new Apple aluminum keyboard turned out to be accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything&#8217;s possible. The leaked photos of the new Apple aluminum keyboard turned out to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Steffen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niklas Steffen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[100% fake. Apple would never design such unbalanced-looking iPods. The look squashed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% fake. Apple would never design such unbalanced-looking iPods. The look squashed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[over the years i have seen many pictures of supposed new ipods, imacs, new laptops and iphones.

everytime these pictures have turned out to be fakes.

these nano&#039;s look disgusting. whoever created these fakes lacks imagination if you ask me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>over the years i have seen many pictures of supposed new ipods, imacs, new laptops and iphones.</p>
<p>everytime these pictures have turned out to be fakes.</p>
<p>these nano&#8217;s look disgusting. whoever created these fakes lacks imagination if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Gray</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Raven: It certainly could be. There&#039;s two ways to go... either it&#039;s real as you suggest, or the rumor is from a good impostor who knows Apple&#039;s typical branding. That&#039;s all part of the fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Raven: It certainly could be. There&#8217;s two ways to go&#8230; either it&#8217;s real as you suggest, or the rumor is from a good impostor who knows Apple&#8217;s typical branding. That&#8217;s all part of the fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raven</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just playing devil&#039;s advocate here, but what about a leaked .psd of an upcoming ad?  That fanned arrangement does call to mind other Apple ads, at least in my mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just playing devil&#8217;s advocate here, but what about a leaked .psd of an upcoming ad?  That fanned arrangement does call to mind other Apple ads, at least in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/2007/08/22/9to5mac-claims-next-gen-nano-leak/#comment-323113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention the shadows on each ipod are totally inconsistent with what should be a single light source, fake!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the shadows on each ipod are totally inconsistent with what should be a single light source, fake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

