<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Mac Security Apps Compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macs Open to Security Flaw Thanks to Windows in VMware Fusion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Macs Open to Security Flaw Thanks to Windows in VMware Fusion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are not invulnerable to attack, despite what we may sometimes think. There&#8217;s a variety of security software out there to consider, but as always, smart and safe usage is your best bet for avoiding most [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are not invulnerable to attack, despite what we may sometimes think. There&#8217;s a variety of security software out there to consider, but as always, smart and safe usage is your best bet for avoiding most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great comparison. Petty that you did not include Undercover.
I just bought MacTrak (but I was about to choose Undercover, but I preferred less intrusion) and I installed iAlertU.
Great!
Nevertheless I should mention, that if you have your laptop password protected you better create a guest account, other wise I guess that if they steal it they will not be able to use it and therefore to take pictures of the person who took it from you.
Also to add a firmware password using your installation CD. That will prevent to reinstall the OS and delete everything.
MacTrak and Undercover have good things. The first one uses wifi location technology and the company has nothing to do if you activate tracking. You get emails and flickr photos directly from the Mac. The second they do it. They just use IP to locate (not always very accurate) but they have a plan b, to fade the screen and display that this laptop is stolen. I like that....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comparison. Petty that you did not include Undercover.<br />
I just bought MacTrak (but I was about to choose Undercover, but I preferred less intrusion) and I installed iAlertU.<br />
Great!<br />
Nevertheless I should mention, that if you have your laptop password protected you better create a guest account, other wise I guess that if they steal it they will not be able to use it and therefore to take pictures of the person who took it from you.<br />
Also to add a firmware password using your installation CD. That will prevent to reinstall the OS and delete everything.<br />
MacTrak and Undercover have good things. The first one uses wifi location technology and the company has nothing to do if you activate tracking. You get emails and flickr photos directly from the Mac. The second they do it. They just use IP to locate (not always very accurate) but they have a plan b, to fade the screen and display that this laptop is stolen. I like that&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Hendrick ROFL! Good one, that is just too funny. Thanks for that, it made my day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hendrick ROFL! Good one, that is just too funny. Thanks for that, it made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I purchased the MacTrak product after this review, the location was really accurate, about it showed my neighbors house, but still that is pretty cool, this along with a photo could be really useful.

I was curious about the Wi-Fi positioning used by MacTrak, it is pretty cool, I didn&#039;t know the iPhone and iPod Touch were using this, even the 3G as it appears the GPS does not work indoors, there is a video overview here:

http://skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/

Pretty innovative, I was also really surprised to see that they have a database of wi-fi routers all around the world and not just in the US. It works in from Seattle to Singapore.  I am curious if this will work on the Virgina Atlantic flights that have wi-fi now :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased the MacTrak product after this review, the location was really accurate, about it showed my neighbors house, but still that is pretty cool, this along with a photo could be really useful.</p>
<p>I was curious about the Wi-Fi positioning used by MacTrak, it is pretty cool, I didn&#8217;t know the iPhone and iPod Touch were using this, even the 3G as it appears the GPS does not work indoors, there is a video overview here:</p>
<p><a href="http://skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/" rel="nofollow">http://skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/</a></p>
<p>Pretty innovative, I was also really surprised to see that they have a database of wi-fi routers all around the world and not just in the US. It works in from Seattle to Singapore.  I am curious if this will work on the Virgina Atlantic flights that have wi-fi now :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would say compare lojack, verey from bak2u and undercover from orbicule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say compare lojack, verey from bak2u and undercover from orbicule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Jason: The security discussed in the article is the actual physical theft of the computer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jason: The security discussed in the article is the actual physical theft of the computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally have undercover and it gives you great piece of mind, yet, I think it would make the apps that much more compelling if it had some of the features of Gadget Track,ie. webiste to see the location etc. - and even if it is just to see that it works with your own eyes.Overall, still the best though I guess.

Embedded in hardware would be brilliant, but I guess Apple would be the last one to go down that path - far to &quot;corporate&quot; I guess.

Cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally have undercover and it gives you great piece of mind, yet, I think it would make the apps that much more compelling if it had some of the features of Gadget Track,ie. webiste to see the location etc. &#8211; and even if it is just to see that it works with your own eyes.Overall, still the best though I guess.</p>
<p>Embedded in hardware would be brilliant, but I guess Apple would be the last one to go down that path &#8211; far to &#8220;corporate&#8221; I guess.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Meyers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Meyers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see why I need Mac security apps at all?

My Mac has been super secure from day one - no problems unlike my Windows machine.

jmyers0341@gmail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why I need Mac security apps at all?</p>
<p>My Mac has been super secure from day one &#8211; no problems unlike my Windows machine.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:jmyers0341@gmail.com">jmyers0341@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was always curious how Undercover works with law enforcement in the United States, when they are based in Belgium(?). I don&#039;t think they do all the work for you, as by law you have to file a police report yourself in person. I would prefer I provide the evidence to the police myself, it just makes more sense than asking a company in Europe to contact the police in my city. I am also paranoid, so I don&#039;t like the LoJack approach where you have to contact a company to get data they collected from MY system. I guess I am less lazy and more paranoid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was always curious how Undercover works with law enforcement in the United States, when they are based in Belgium(?). I don&#8217;t think they do all the work for you, as by law you have to file a police report yourself in person. I would prefer I provide the evidence to the police myself, it just makes more sense than asking a company in Europe to contact the police in my city. I am also paranoid, so I don&#8217;t like the LoJack approach where you have to contact a company to get data they collected from MY system. I guess I am less lazy and more paranoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertrand</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bertrand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For sure, undercover is one of the best application. Why ? Just because they do all the law part for you by giving evidences and so on to justice so that you can claim your laptop.
I will have a look to the 3 apps you mention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure, undercover is one of the best application. Why ? Just because they do all the law part for you by giving evidences and so on to justice so that you can claim your laptop.<br />
I will have a look to the 3 apps you mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GadgetTrak Anti-Theft Software for Mobile Phones, Laptops, iPods and more;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GadgetTrak Anti-Theft Software for Mobile Phones, Laptops, iPods and more;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Apple Blog did a review of four security products for your Mac and MacTrak held up quite well, you could even say it took the prize in comparison.  MacTrak for OS X is heralded as “the most advanced theft recovery solution available for Apple systems”. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Apple Blog did a review of four security products for your Mac and MacTrak held up quite well, you could even say it took the prize in comparison.  MacTrak for OS X is heralded as “the most advanced theft recovery solution available for Apple systems”. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually the Wi-Fi positioning is not just North America, it works world wide. You can do a search on this page for a country, city etc and will show areas of coverage.

http://www.gadgettrak.com/products/mac/location

Nice comparison by the way! Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the Wi-Fi positioning is not just North America, it works world wide. You can do a search on this page for a country, city etc and will show areas of coverage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gadgettrak.com/products/mac/location" rel="nofollow">http://www.gadgettrak.com/products/mac/location</a></p>
<p>Nice comparison by the way! Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tried adeona.  never worked.  OpenDHT seemed to be down or inaccessible so frequently that adeona never reliably reported any data.  better than 80% chance that if you lap top took a walk you&#039;d never see it again.  in this case, free was not a good enough deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tried adeona.  never worked.  OpenDHT seemed to be down or inaccessible so frequently that adeona never reliably reported any data.  better than 80% chance that if you lap top took a walk you&#8217;d never see it again.  in this case, free was not a good enough deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJFelix</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJFelix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm ... I believe I remember this from April ...

http://theappleblog.com/2008/04/25/protect-your-mac/

Yup.  New editing staff must not have remembered to do a search first.  Last time, they only reviewed LoJack and Undercover.

I agree with everyone else above.  Undercover is the best.  The reason is that they will deal with law enforcement for you.  They do this on a daily basis, so they know how to approach law enforcement, what to tell them, and how to get them to respond ... quickly.

It&#039;s priced much cheaper than LoJack, and they even have a family plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8230; I believe I remember this from April &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://theappleblog.com/2008/04/25/protect-your-mac/" rel="nofollow">http://theappleblog.com/2008/04/25/protect-your-mac/</a></p>
<p>Yup.  New editing staff must not have remembered to do a search first.  Last time, they only reviewed LoJack and Undercover.</p>
<p>I agree with everyone else above.  Undercover is the best.  The reason is that they will deal with law enforcement for you.  They do this on a daily basis, so they know how to approach law enforcement, what to tell them, and how to get them to respond &#8230; quickly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s priced much cheaper than LoJack, and they even have a family plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t tried it but there is also Mac Phone Home]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tried it but there is also Mac Phone Home</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CountPollen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/apple/4-mac-security-apps-compared/#comment-335594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CountPollen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=10453#comment-335594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget &quot;Undercover&quot;
http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/

In my opinion the best!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget &#8220;Undercover&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/" rel="nofollow">http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/</a></p>
<p>In my opinion the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

