1 Comment


A new Senate bill proposes a way for companies to fulfill 40-year old FCC device labeling requirements by showing certifications digitally, on a device’s screen.


Most smartphones and tablets sold in the United States have one thing in common: a tiny etched FCC logo somewhere on the case, as well as other technical labels, indicating the device has been approved by the FCC. Devices with wireless connectivity will still require FCC approval, but if the E-Label Act, which was introduced in the Senate on Thursday, is passed, that symbol will no longer need to be etched onto every single gadget.


As reported in The Hill, Senators Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) and Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) introduced the bill, which would allow companies to skip etching the FCC logo onto smartphones, tablets, and laptops, and instead present the certification as a “digital stamp.” A digital stamp could take the form of a splash screen when the device boots up, or as a menu item alongside other device information.

This could be a boon for companies figuring out how to include legally required regulatory information on devices and device categories that continue to shrink, like smartwatches. But while it could save money on etching costs, it also presents problems for devices without screens. Lots of internet of things products require FCC approval and labeling, but might not offer a logical way to display a “digital stamp.”

Also note that the FCC certification isn’t the only indecipherable symbol on the back of gadgets; the European Union uses a CE logo, China has its own certification stamp and there are also often symbols from nonprofits like the Underwriters Laboratory to certify that the product is reliable. Even if this bill passes and eventually becomes law — and it’s still in its early stages — gadget makers would still have to meet international labeling requirements, so you’ll still be buying phones with inscrutable symbols on the back.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings


Community guidelines
Saturday, August 30, 2014
you are commenting using your account. Sign out / Change

Comment using:

Or comment as a guest

Be sure to review our Community Guidelines. By continuing you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

1 Comment

  1. Dave Ingram Friday, July 11, 2014

    Don’t forget to mention the C-Tick, Australia & New Zealand’s EMC certification. Why Apple have used an Australian reference (N122) and a New Zealand one (Z844) is beyond me since each country recognises the other’s.