8 Comments

Summary:

A new site called Tom Kabinet sells secondhand ebooks. Publishers say this is illegal, and with a deadline passing on Friday the case looks set to go to court.

Tom Kabinet

A major lawsuit is about to take place in the Netherlands, dragging the issue of the resale of digital media back into European courts.

On Tuesday this week, a local startup called Tom Kabinet opened the virtual doors on its secondhand ebook bookstore. At the moment, it is generally accepted that ebooks cannot be resold, as is the case with music, movies and other digital media.

However, Tom Kabinet is pointing to a 2012 ruling by Europe’s top court, the Court of Justice of the European Union, in the case of UsedSoft v Oracle. That case was about reselling licenses for downloadable software, and the court ruled that – even when the software license explicitly forbids resale – the buyer should have the right to resell that licence, just as they would be allowed to resell a boxed software copy.

“The publishers have asked us to stop operating with a deadline of today at 2pm [5am PT],” Tom Kabinet co-founder Laurens van Hoorn told me on Friday. “We’ve let them know that we won’t put the site on black – they basically asked us to take the site offline but we won’t do that.”

“We expect that if they don’t shut their activities down, the next step will probably be a court case in the very short term,” Martijn David, the secretary general of the Dutch Publishers Association (NUV) told me.

Honor system

The NUV sees Tom Kabinet as aiding piracy – it says it is easy for people to illegally download ebooks then sell them for profit. Tom Kabinet says it wants to fight piracy, and the publishers should be working with it to do so.

“I think we’re on the same side of the table,” van Hoorn said. “Both parties are interested in fighting the illegal use of ebooks. We’re both opposed to piracy of ebooks and I think if we worked together we would make a much stronger case.”

Van Hoorn explained that Tom Kabinet tracks what is uploaded and adds a “watermark” to any publication passing through its systems, making it impossible for someone to sell an ebook multiple times.

However, there’s a flaw in the system that could hurt the bookstore’s defense. One of the key provisions of the UsedSoft ruling was that, in order for the transaction to be legal, the seller must “make the copy downloaded onto his own computer unusable at the time of resale.”

Tom Kabinet has no way of ensuring that this has happened, so it is easily possible for someone to both keep and sell the ebooks they’ve bought. The company can only run an honor system, asking people to confirm that they purchased the ebook legally and that they have deleted their own copy.

“If we could work together with the publishers, we would be even better able to judge if the content that is being offered to us is offered by the legal holder,” van Hoorn said. “It would be great if we could work together with the publishers to make the ebook market more healthy for them and for the consumer.

“In the end it would be the best situation [where] if you want to read the latest book you need to buy it new from the publisher, and if you can wait you can buy it from Tom Kabinet as a secondhand ebook for a little bit lower price. That’s the normal way of things and that’s the way it should be.”

“No approach”

However, David said Tom Kabinet only approached the publishers for the first time on Tuesday, as it went live.

“If you want to work with publishers, why start with illegal content?” David asked. “Why not start with, ‘Can we work together and join forces?’ … I haven’t heard of any publisher who has been approached a reasonable amount of time before they started operating.”

David’s belief is that the UsedSoft precedent doesn’t apply here because it was specific to software “and it doesn’t stretch out to any digital product” – in this regard, he pointed to a ruling last year in the German regional court at Bielefeld, which established just that. What’s more, he said he couldn’t see how any website could check that uploaded ebooks are legitimate, and that the whole idea was “market disturbance” that could harm the ebook trade.

“The market is developing and the last thing you should do is kill it,” David claimed. “Certainly in the Netherlands it is small but growing, and these kinds of initiatives don’t make anything better.”

David also complained that authors weren’t getting anything out of second or third sales. However, van Hoorn said the firm does have a “Friends of Tom” program for authors and publishers through which authors can get a “donation for work sold through TK.”

This is a very live issue over in the U.S. these days, with Congress soliciting opinions from the publishing and tech industries. Although most normal people probably expect to have the same rights with virtual goods as they do with physical books and CDs, that’s not actually the case – and in Europe, the upcoming Tom Kabinet v NUV case may finally help clear up the confusion for once and for all.

  1. it’s going to change the whole issue of copyright, if a book is resold, does that not create revenue for the author of the work also, ?, this will get very interesting

    Reply Share
  2. Nissan B Thomas Friday, June 27, 2014

    No, under the first sale doctrine in the US, once a physical product is bought by the consumer, the first sale doctrine allows that individual to resale that physical product that was purchased. The author of that work is cut off from the proceeds of the second hand sale. However, the individual who resold the physical product, no longer has the item in their possession. However, I do believe there is a way to allow the resale of digital products, whereby the purchaser, the author or rights owner, and the platform that facilitates the transaction can all get a piece of the pie. This just takes some outside of the box thinking, but that is what the times call for. Instead of saying this cannot happen, it can. Looming over this issue, especially in the US are consumer protection issues, since a download connotes ownership, but actually if your purchase an ebook from Amazon or itunes, the consumer actually does not own it, because they cannot do anything with it. The download is only providing access. In any event, there is a business around the resale of digital goods.

    Reply Share
  3. That “flaw in the system” is pretty crucial. I think he’s probably doomed with this business model.

    Reply Share
  4. B. Alan Bourgeois Wednesday, July 2, 2014

    I sincerely hope that ALL authors who value their work contact the company and let them know it will hurt their income. Independents will loose the most, but in the long run, ALL authors will loose. ALL authors work has value from the first time the work is published through out their lives! I sent them a message through their site, I hope you do to. B. Alan Bourgeois

    Reply Share
  5. There are already people who pirate content for profit. This would only make their lives much, much easier.

    I don’t know why the software ruling was made in the way that it was made, but it seems obvious to me that this is a violation of the purpose of copyright. We, as a society, want our creative types to make a living from creating things that other people want.

    When you re-sell a book, no new copy is made. When you re-sell a digital product, a new copy is made, and there’s no way on Earth to keep the old copy from continuing in use. All of the DRM and other techniques that have been tried have been cracked within days (or hours) of their debut, and the techniques for doing so posted for any idiot to apply.

    Anyone who adjudicates these issues should keep that fact in mind, and remember the law of unintended consequences.

    Reply Share
  6. I meant that no new copy is made when you re-sell a print book.

    Reply Share