7 Comments

Summary:

It’s been a disheartening year for net neutrality and the open internet. While much of the furor has focused on the implications for video-streaming services, Zingaya’s CEO Alexey Aylarov thinks the future may be even more perilous for VoIP.

At my company, Zingaya, we work on VoIP solutions in click-to-call technology (which is one segment of a big industry, with Skype being the most well-known VoIP company). Given our position in this industry, my colleagues and I have watched the developments of the net neutrality court case and subsequent moves by ISPs very closely, with an eye on how these changes will impact innovation in the rapidly changing VoIP field.

With the end of FCC enforcement of open internet rules, a few select companies will very quickly be making major decisions on how fast most users will be able to access content across the web. Video streaming, as we know, takes up a plurality of bandwidth usage (and will only increase in popularity). However, the danger isn’t just limited to video. The major ISPs in the United States — Comcast and AT&T among others — often also provide voice services that directly compete with many of the services provided by VoIP. As industry analyst Phil Edholm points out, it would be easy for ISPs to push VoIP providers to a lower level of service unless those providers pay extra to be bumped up to a better service level. Since VoIP requires a certain threshold of data speed to deliver an effective sound or picture quality to customers, reducing that quality negatively impacts customer willingness to adopt VoIP over the alternatives.

What’s more, the innovative possibilities of VoIP and VoIP-related technologies, like WebRTC, will also be throttled by the lack of open internet standards. New VoIP technologies are often not just limited to voice; they incorporate video capabilities as well. VoIP services require simultaneous high quality upload and download streams, instead of just download streams as with a service like Netflix. As such, VoIP shares many of the same concerns as video streaming, and the dangers for VoIP services may be even greater.

Having a level playing field for telecommunications in particular is vital, and there’s a reason why the FCC already regulates telephone service. In the absence of net neutrality, nascent VoIP services will have a harder time gaining traction. They, like up-and-coming video streaming services, will have to pay for the data quality they need. As a result, firms in the future will not compete on the true merits of their products, but will instead compete in an environment where the best quality is granted to the firms that can pay the most — a surefire way to stifle innovation.

WebRTC is perhaps particularly interesting here, as it continues to increase in adoption and thus will be intertwined with net neutrality. According to the WebRTC standard, all media traffic is encrypted (via Datagram Transport Layer Security, or DTLS) and sent using Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP). This encryption may confound ISPs seeking to throttle bandwidth based on what kind of traffic is passing through their channels, because they will not be able to recognize the precise nature of it. In response, some ISPs have invested in expensive hardware (like DPI, deep packet inspection) for examining the packets running through their networks. Since WebRTC can and will be used in a variety of ways, there will certainly be questions regarding how providers detect what’s running inside the encrypted channels.

But in any case, net neutrality isn’t dead. First, this ruling only applies to the United States. Second, though the FCC is not appealing the ruling, it is exploring other means of enforcing open internet standards. The oversight of particular actions will occur on a more case-by-case basis, but the FCC is still also considering reclassifying internet service if those other means are not effective. These efforts are heartening, and those of us interested in the future of VoIP should be invested in supporting these open internet standards.

Alexey Aylarov is the CEO of Zingaya, which enables online calls from web pages. Aylarov is also the founder of VoxImplant, a communications cloud platform for mobile and web app developers.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock user imagedb.com.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

Comment

Community guidelines
Saturday, August 30, 2014
you are commenting using your account. Sign out / Change

Comment using:

Or comment as a guest

Be sure to review our Community Guidelines. By continuing you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

7 Comments

  1. Ummmmm…how ’bout because VoIP travels over the dumb pipes and is just as subject to metering as any other traffic?

  2. Nikohl Vandel Saturday, June 14, 2014

    Reblogged this on Niki.V.all.ways.My.way. and commented:
    which is why I will be in Sacramento, CA this summer to demand our State assert some protection against the over reaching federal government to protect the internet for the People and businesses in California. Its tym to assert States Rights on this issue! #NatGat2014
    #1AUG14SAC

  3. Net Neutrality allows anyone to start a business online and succeed. What FCC Tom Wheeler wants to do is pass a law that allows paid prioritization creating a slow lane and fast lane internet system. Meaning mega rich corporations can pay for a fast lane and the 99 percent of the people wont be allowed to succeed online.

    Hollywood wants to be the only ones that create content and profit from it and no one else.. Sites that u love that isn’t owned by Hollywood will be blocked. Goods and services that u purchase and use that isn’t blessed by Hollywood will be blocked. No more freedom of speech. No more choice. Basically if u love how the internet currently is then u love Net Neutrality. Its that simple regardless what the paid puppets of corporations are trying to brainwash u otherwise.

    The internet has turned into the biggest utility we use today. We do are banking, we buy and sell goods, we run businesses, we teach classes, we use maps, we COMMUNICATE with each other and so much more. The internet is a utility and its time to reclassify as such! Its time to pass title ll law for the internet, like they did with the phone companies, where all calls are treated the same. The internet is for communication!!

  4. spixleatedlifeform Sunday, June 15, 2014

    I believe all three previous posters either do not understand the very words they read, OR, they are paid hacks who twist meaning to suit their “secret” employers.
    A direct quote from the article cited above by the link “is still also considering reclassifying internet service if those other means are not effective” :

    “WASHINGTON — Regulators are taking another crack at their effort to keep the web free and open, introducing new rules that would discourage Internet service providers from charging companies to stream their movies, music and other content through a faster express lane.”

    So, Sam Foster, Nikohl Vandel and Gargamel Ted, how to explain yourselves?

    I give you one chance to admit you totally misunderstand the matter, as well as the articles.

    SPLF

    PS. There IS one solution not mentioned. REGULATE ALL ISPs as utilities and prohibit their co-ownership of the content they transmit. Haven’t you heard? Reaganism is DEAD!

    SPLF

    1. The key word is “discourage”, not stop. There’ a big difference. It’s like saying “can” and “shall”.

  5. Jim Crawford Monday, June 16, 2014

    Simply put, net neutrality is the incumbents’ latest ploy to further market consolidation, a cross-industry trend that began in Ronald Reagan’s time. Read this outstanding article, “The Great Unequalizer,” in yesterday’s Washington Post. http://wapo.st/SJY1Qn

    I don’t foresee carriers making any new investment in DPI to crack encrypted traffic. Most already have such capabilities built in to government-mandated CALEA (lawful intercept) solutions. Still, it’s amusing to think that content providers might get around paying “fast lane” fees just by using encryption,

    Which, on a completely tangential note, brings to mind a truly hilarious thought. The one communications sector that has thus far eluded consolidation is electronic surveillance. It’s a huge marketplace with hundreds of players of all sizes, but highly secretive. Nobody knows for sure who lurks behind those shades and trench coats.

  6. Nailed it!