4 Comments

Summary:

Google’s Chrome OS has used the Ash window manager for nearly two years and it’s not well optimized for touch. References to Project Athena suggest a new interface is in the works and it could be used for a Chrome OS tablet.

chrome tablet

Based on the open source Chromium project that Google bases its Chrome OS platform on, it appears that a new project is underway to radically change the user interface of Chrome OS devices. Details are scarce and Google hasn’t announced any such changes, but there are dozens of code references in the Chromium issue tracker pointing to something called Project Athena.

From what I can piece together, Athena will alter the way users interact with windows and apps in Chrome OS, adding more touch-friendly capabilities. While Athena could lead to a Chrome OS tablet, or even a phone, it’s possible Google is simply reworking the front face of Chrome OS for touchscreen laptops. At this point, it’s far too soon to say.

Chrome tablet

I first heard of the Athena code references on Google+ from Brandon Lall, who shared a few specific URLs pointing to the Chromium issues site with regards to Athena. From there, I found several other related Athena issues being worked on. Here are just a few to give you an idea of what the project might entail:

Based on what I’ve found so far, Athena looks to be a replacement for, or the next evolution of, Ash, the window manager for Chrome OS that arrived in 2012. In fact, one of the issue descriptions from June 3 pretty much confirms that: “There will be a mismatch of settings between Athena and Ash, but we’ll want to share as much code as possible between the systems.”

As far as specific devices, none are mentioned in any of the code references I’ve come across. That would make sense if Athena is an improved windows manager for Chrome OS. However, Lall specifically pointed out one issue that suggests a possible tablet or phone — maybe even a wearable —  that could Athena would run on: There’s mention of support for both a gyroscope and accelerometer, neither of which would typically be found in a Chromebook or Chromebox.

Touch is surely a big part of Athena because the project team is working on its first set of touch gestures. These will include dragging up from the bottom edge for “overview mode” and a split-screen mode when dragging right from the left edge; that sounds similar to how Microsoft Windows is used for multiple apps on a touchscreen device.

Might we finally see the Chrome OS tablet I’ve pined for, thanks to Athena? Possibly, although I have noted that Chrome OS isn’t truly optimized for touch, so a tablet with the current software wouldn’t be ideal. Perhaps Athena is the touch-optimized interface to change all that.

 

 

  1. Project Hera on Android, Project Athena on Chrome… somebody should check for other greek gods in Google source code. There is definitely something big cooking up.

    Reply Share
    1. Jonathan Joshua Friday, June 27, 2014

      Who knows what Project Zeus is going to be !?

      Reply Share
  2. Always skeptical of calling Chrome OS a OS. Even the Linux community seem reluctant to address it as such. After using a Chromebook for about a year. I don’t see much OS about it.
    Other then it has just enough core OS to operate hardware and run a browser. This to me is nothing more then a OS that runs a appliance or a specific function. Its a web access device and a cloud solution. I don’t find it compelling in the least as a PC. I can basically do what a Chromebook does on a PC or Mac using a Chrome browser. That would not make me want to spends hundreds on weak hardware, little storage or limited function for a all web device.
    Android is far better suited for a tablet then Chrome OS. Chrome OS would be a step back for tablets. I compare a Chromebook to a netbook of a few years ago. Only instead of a full OS capable of running software, you get a browser and the ability to book mark URL’s poising as apps. Its amazing how little people will accept with Google’s name on it.

    Reply Share
    1. Completely understand where you’re coming from, John.

      “This to me is nothing more then a OS that runs a appliance or a specific function. Its a web access device and a cloud solution. I don’t find it compelling in the least as a PC. I can basically do what a Chromebook does on a PC or Mac using a Chrome browser. ”

      The thing is — and I realize that Chrome OS or the use case it provides isn’t for everyone — while you can just use a PC or a Mac, you get a lot more that comes with that experience, as you said. But some folks don’t want that, i.e.: bunches of updates, more complex features that take up resources, etc…. They simply want what a browsing appliance provides because of the simplicity and their needs.

      Also, this statement isn’t accurate at all: “you get a browser and the ability to book mark URL’s poising as apps.” If you haven’t already check out what developers are doing with packaged and native client apps which are standalone, offline-capable software titles that run outside the browser. Thanks!

      Reply Share