7 Comments

Summary:

The early verdict on Samsung Chromebook 2 benchmark testing doesn’t bode well if you want to maximize performance. Tune in to this week’s podcast to hear why and learn how Google is adding new ways for developers to make money in the Chrome Web Store.

The Chrome Show 2014

It’s far too early to dismiss the new Samsung Chromebook 2 laptops but the early signs based on benchmarks suggest a limited performance gain over their predecessors. That’s OK, if you do buy one — or any other new Chromebook for that matter — you now get a 60 day trial of Google Play Music All Access. And Google is trying to woo more developers with ways to monetize themes, apps and extensions in the Chrome Web Store.

Download This Episode

The Chrome Show RSS Feed

Subscribe in iTunes

SHOW NOTES:
Hosts: Janko Roettgers and Kevin C. Tofel

This week’s Chrome Show is brought to you by FreshBooks and Fracture.

Google makes it easier for devs to make money in the Chrome Web Store

Samsung Chromebook 2 benchmarks may disappoint some

Google will have a wearables SDK for Android. Perhaps that Bluetooth Smart function added to Chrome will come in handy?

First time Chromebook owner? Now you can get a 60 day trial to Google Play Music All Access

Google has sold “millions” of Chromecast devices, international expansion coming soon

Chrome has a new experimental flag to help you get connected to a public hotspot that requires login

Asus Chromebox finally available for sale; quickly became the #1 desktop on Amazon

App / Extension of the week: Google Keep, which got an upgrade

  1. I just ran benchmarks on my own Samsung Chromebook (series 3) in guest mode, and the results were between 5% and 10% better for the Samsung 2 among the tests.

    And yet, the Samsung Chromebook 2, 11 inch version has two more A15 cores, all four with higher clockspeeds at that (1.9 GHz as compared to the series 3′s 1.7 GHz) and four additional A7 cores that can all be used at once with the Octa version.

    I can’t imagine how it would only feel like “10% better” when you’re using it. These benchmark tests are…..limited.

    Share
    1. That’s good information, Wesley. It’s entirely possible that Chrome OS isn’t optimized to take advantage of all of the cores in the new Samsung octo-core chip, which would also cause lower scores than we might think.

      Share
      1. Which may suggest that the processor is not a good match for chromebooks.

        Share
      2. That’s not something I would have considered at all, but is completely fair.
        The limited research (Googling) I’ve done on the three benchmarks used in the video say that the tests don’t attempt to consider multiple cores, regardless of OS though.

        Share
      3. Paul matencio Sunday, March 16, 2014

        Chrome OS has no problem with multi-cores since it is based on Linux. Octane 2.0 benchmark test JavaScript performance on 1 Core and not on 8 cores. I believe only the zlib ( 1 of 18) test is testing multi-core.
        This is to say that Octane 2.0 is comparing a single ARM core against a single Intel Haswell core and that’s all.

        Share
  2. Yep, nithing special in here :/

    Share
  3. Paul matencio Sunday, March 16, 2014

    Kevin I believe you missed the point. Only 1 of 18 Octane 2.0 tests run multi-cores, all the other tests just run on single.

    To be fair, you should run 1,2,4 and 8 Octane 2.0 in // to assess the new Samsung CB.

    I ran Octane 2.0 on my old C7 ( dual core 1.1 Mhz ) and Chrome OS 34( Beta channel). Here are the results

    1 Run : 7107 ( pretty fast compared to 6200 sometimes ago)
    2 Runs in // : 5430 and 6645 ( average = 6037 or -15%)
    4 Runs in //: 3023,2943,2919,6386 ( average= 3817 or -46%)

    I believe he average scores will drop sharply with 8 concurrent runs

    Just to say that number of cores mater and the new Samsung octa-processors CB will perform much better than any Intel dual cores CB( but the Pixel?) when you have multiple applications active concurrently.

    On the other hands, the new Samsung single core might be not fast enough for some heavy sites that require a lot of processor to load.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post