14 Comments

Summary:

Well, that was quick: The Qplay TV adapter goes on sale one day after Gigaom broke the story about the device’s impending launch.

Qplaytvadapter

TiVo co-founders Michael Ramsay and Jim Barton are back with a new venture dubbed Qplay that hopes to do for online video what TiVo did for television. The duo unveiled their new Qplay device and service Tuesday, and launched an early adopter program during which the Qplay device is available for $49.

Ramsay told me during an interview Monday that the company has ambitious plans to eventually unite video clips from sites like YouTube, premium videos from services like Netflix and Hulu Plus and even live television, but that it decided to start with a more modest offering. “Today, we are at square one,” he said.

So what does square one look like? Qplay is a video streaming device that is about the size of an external hard drive. It doesn’t come with a remote control, but instead is controlled solely by an iPad app. Video playback is started directly from the cloud, much like it’s the case with Google’s Chromecast, making it possible to keep videos playing even when another iPad app is used, or the iPad is turned off entirely.

QPlay's iPad app.

Qplay’s iPad app.

One of the differences to Chromecast is that QPlay organizes everything around queues, or Qs, as the company likes to call the. Queues are essentially playlists for videos, some of which are automatically generated based on RSS and Twitter feeds, while others are curated by Qplay’s users.

Queues play nonstop, which is supposed to create a more lean-back, TV-like experience. Ramsay showed me a few queues, including a news feed based on a variety of Twitter feeds from news publishers, which he said can be watched without interruption without ever repeating itself. Other queues he showed off were based on his YouTube subscriptions, queues shared by other users on the service, videos the National Geographic shares through its Twitter account, and finally a watch later-like queue that can be fed by a bookmarklet.

The other big difference to Chromecast, and other media streaming devices for that matter, is that Qplay wants to integrate all media into a single app instead of forcing users to access many different apps for their favorite videos. “There used to be 500 channels, now there are 500 apps,” he said. At launch, Qplay supports videos from YouTube, Vimeo, Vine and other publishers.

Premium video services like Netflix and Hulu Plus won’t be available during the early adopter phase, but Ramsay told me that the company is planning to offer access to these services soon as well. He showed me Netflix already integrated into a demo build of the iPad app, and explained that the Qplay device is based on Android, and thus capable of running a number of premium video apps. The goal was to eventually offer the ability to add TV shows from Netflix and YouTube videos to the same queue, he said.

Of course, the timing of the launch and other details including the desire to work with Netflix come as no surprise to Gigaom readers; I’ve been tracking Qplay’s progress since late last year, and broke the news on Monday that the launch was imminent. In that story, I also reported that the company’s terms of service hinted at plans to monetize Qplay through service fees.

Ramsay said Monday that Qplay’s app will always be free, but that the company does plan to offer value-added services that it could charge for down the line. These could include the ability to upload, host and share personal videos, but Ramsay and Barton are apparently also considering to get back to their roots and add live TV to the device. Ramsay told me that the Qplay hardware could be easily extended to add live TV viewing and recording.

A new take on the DVR from the inventors of TiVo — that actually sounds like an interesting premise. However, I’m still skeptical about the Qplay device and service in its current form. Numerous iPad and Android apps have tried content aggregation and personalization before, often with little success — and it’s uncertain whether a device like the Qplay adapter will really make the difference.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Reminds me of Boxee a little.

  2. Reminds me of the YouTube playlist feature… and I already own a Chromecast (and Roku, Apple TV, TiVo) that play YouTube.

    1. After further thought, I’m going to contradict myself and agree with Shawn. Having said that with the new Roku streaming stick and Amazon streamer weeks away, I’m saving my cash.

  3. First we need more content providers utilizing the Chromecast paradigm (if there is a better phrase for this concept let me know). Only then can we really start worrying about content aggregation. Switching between apps on the Chromecast is not that difficult as it is. It’s much quicker and easier than on physical remote based platforms.

    I would like a “Dedicated Chromecast Mode” though. I tend to flip around apps a bit, and having to reconnect to the Chromecast every time I switch apps becomes a little annoying. It would be nice if the apps asked my tablet “Is he connected to a Chromecast?” and immediately knew that when I click on something to play I want it on the Chromecast. Perhaps we’ll see Google move in this direction. I want to be clear that even as it stands, it’s a much better paradigm than other platforms.

  4. Jeremy Campbell Tuesday, February 25, 2014

    Interesting, has potential, but I don’t see this product as a breakthrough product, maybe over time if the product gets a chance to evolve with the market. Brilliant people behind it, so there’s a chance.

  5. Wait, you can only use this if you have or buy an iPad to use as the remote? Not the wisest of moves. I don’t expect to hear about this device again.

    1. I bet they at least expand it to Android.

  6. I can’t get around yet another device that runs on Android that is *not* for Android. I understand that fragmentation poses a challenge out of the gate, but to not even mention that an Android device is being, at the very least, considered? I’ll wait for the new Roku stick.

    1. I meant that an Android *app is being, at the very least, considered…

  7. Each tech gets us a little closer. Here’s what I want: a Q like device that I can program my favorite shows and upcoming movies, and as soon as they are available, add them to my favorites list for playback on any device I own.

    Too much?

    1. Tivo already does that, at least from TV..

  8. What is the difference between this and plair 2 which is also 49 dollars and can play Netflix and Hulu also? PASS…….

  9. Plair been doing this and more for sometime.

  10. Discovery should be amazing, personalized recommendations so good you just want to devour every title suggested, and of course, the UX should be cross platform.
    But the piece that consumers are still waiting for is seamless cross catalog discovery and viewing.

Comments have been disabled for this post