19 Comments

Summary:

Lawmakers are seeking to ban Google Glass when driving and Google is reportedly fighting back with lobbyists. I can and do drive with Glass, so I see both sides. I’d prefer a technical solution to a legislative one, though.

Driving with Glass

With lawmakers considering regulations that could limit or even prohibit driving while wearing Google Glass, Google is fighting back. The company is lobbying against such action in three U.S. states, Reuters reported on Tuesday, while eight states in total are considering regulations against Glass behind the wheel.

Driving with Glass 2

The report suggests that Google feels it’s premature to institute any laws against driving while wearing Google Glass because the final product isn’t yet available. Currently, those who want Google Glass must apply to be part of the Glass Explorer program — a beta group that pays $1,500 for Glass and provides feedback to Google on the experience. By wearing Glass in public, Explorers typically provide Google Glass demonstrations to the general public as well.

Is there an issue here?

As a Google Glass Explorer myself — one who often wears Glass while driving and has a number of vision challenges — I can clearly see both sides of the issue here.

First and foremost, any action that helps reduce potential car accidents is a good thing in my book. I personally support laws that mandate handsfree smartphone use only while driving, even though I found them inconvenient at first. We don’t need more distractions while driving.

That’s why I take full advantage of the Motorola Assist Driving mode on my Moto X: When the phone detects that I’m in a moving vehicle, it ceases to notify me of incoming information save for a few exceptions. If a family member calls or texts me, my phone announces the event and voice-prompts me to take action or ignore.

Moto Assist featured

Google Glass has no such function at the moment, unless you count the power button. I could always turn Glass off when getting behind the wheel; I don’t even need to take it off my head as it doesn’t block my vision in any way. And by default, the screen on Google Glass isn’t actually on; it doesn’t show anything until there’s something to show.

In fact, a California woman who earned a ticket for driving with Glass didn’t have to pay because her case was thrown out for just that reason: There was no evidence that the Glass screen was active when she was driving. It did turn on when she looked up at the officer who fined her because there’s a optional setting to auto-wake Glass when tilting your head up — I use it myself.

Personally, I find Glass less distracting than my smartphone. To look at the phone, I’d have to take my eyes farther away from the road to find the phone and unlock it with a PIN. Yes, my eyes leave the road when looking up at the Glass screen, but not nearly as far. And Glass is designed to show a very limited amount of glanceable information, so attention reverts back to the road faster.

By the way, every time you look at a street sign of some sort, your eyes are leaving the road too. And because you’re moving, the signs are perceived as moving relative to you: Your eyes track those signs until the information is digested. Yes, the signs are distilled down to show the minimum useful amount of information, but that’s the same point I’m making with Glass: Most of the information appearing on Glass can be consumed just as quickly as that street sign.

The real problem: Where do you stop consuming information?

When I drive with Glass on, I know that there’s a rabbit hole of sorts. It’s the same one we face when driving with a smartphone nearby: How far down the hole do we want to go?  If I see an updated sports score or a breaking news headline, I could tap for more info but I choose not to. Similarly, if my phone sounds an notification alert when driving, I typically don’t take any action save for the special cases mentioned prior.

Driving with Glass 3

Ultimately, it’s up to us to decide what the next actionable step is when our device surfaces some information. Do we glance and ignore or do we glance and decide to take some action, which can then divert even more of our attention? In this way, Glass and smartphones are pretty similar.

The main difference is that Glass is more voice-centric by design than a phone. Not every action can be done with voice on Glass, of course; I find myself tapping and scrolling on the little touchpad quite a bit. Still, voice is a key input method for the wearable, while smartphones are more touch-centric.

It’s too early to condemn the product to legislation

I’m not a lawmaker or a lobbyist; I’m a Glass Explorer and general technology enthusiast. Ideally, I’d like to see each of us make our own decision on how to use personal technology as we see fit. That’s fine when nobody else can be affected. That’s not the case on the roads, however, when there are hundreds of moving objects and people making independent decisions.

Yes, safety has to be a priority but my hope is that we can accomplish that goal without legal restrictions. And I do think it’s worth waiting to see the final, commercially available version of Glass before any new laws are created. A technical solution that’s not ready for public consumption just yet could keep lawyers happy while making it safer to wear Glass behind the wheel so drivers can get directions, search for nearby points of interest or get other information that enhances the driving experience.

Driving with Glass 4

I’ve reached out to Google for comment on this situation and will update this post with any statements or responses.

Updated at 8:13am PT: Google has provided the following statement:

“Technology issues are a big part of the current policy discussion in individual states. We think it is important to be part of that discussion and to help policymakers understand new technologies including Glass.  Glass is currently in the hands of a small group of Explorers but we find that when people try it for themselves they realize that Glass is not meant to distract but rather connect you more with the world around you.”

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Have you tried this yourself yet?

    1. Jim, I’m not sure I could have made that clearer in the post: Yes, I have. All of the pics in the post are from me driving with Glass.

    2. Have you read this yourself?

      1. I LOL’d for real on that one; couldn’t help it. ;)

  2. The same could be said of on-board navigation systems, or children in the car, and those flash billboards designed to catch our attention , as we speed along. The driver not the law determines how distracted we become behind the steering wheel.

    1. Spot on Brook, thanks.

  3. adriancockcroft Tuesday, February 25, 2014

    Glass is an excellent GPS. It wakes up the display only when you get to the junction and has a much better voice input for picking destinations than a car because the microphone is on your head, and google is far better at figuring out what you say than a car.

  4. I tell ya what in the totalitarian state in which we now live, lets just swing for the fence on this glass crap and outlaw it outside the home PERIOD!

    People as a rule are douchbags about their tech , given the opportunity and I dread the arrogant aspect this will add to the me me me attitude of the sheeple in the street!

    1. I should make an android app that detects jealous, cynic assholes and outlines them in your field of vision

  5. How about concentrating on driving your vehicle instead of needing to be constantly online? Most people won’t use it just for navigation reasons. There are too many idiots on the road already distracted by phones and Sat Navs instead of using their brains to control the vehicle.

    1. Good points Greg.

      I’m assuming you drive with no distractions and your eyes on the road at all times, meaning you don’t look at or listen to the radio, don’t check the speedometer for your speed and never respond to anyone in the car that speaks to you. ;)

      1. I will listen to the radio on Low volume, easy music, as it is a distraction, but that’s it, I am an avid cyclist and have been in a hit & run with a women who was on her cell phone, the car crushed me & laid me up in the hospital for a month, Now I believe that the providers of such devices should be held liable for their customers reckless actions, which of course will never occur with their lobbying effort.
        I could less about your life, but if you harm someone else, I say you
        pay dearly with hard time Period.
        Is goog glass useful, of course it is in the proper circumstances, Glass is not New, a guy developed this back in early 2000, with wearable computer glasses which I found intriguing as a tech guy, it of course was big & bulky much like the original cell phones, you worse a small pack on your belt, he is probably collaborating with goolge on this project, It was tailored for people in the field , technicians, doctors etc, Very useful

        But to say lets see what happens for joe & jane blow is moronic , how many innocents must suffer because you think your that much better able to operate a killing machine then others while distracted, lol lame defense bud

  6. I think this would distract people hugely from paying attention to their driving.

  7. Hey, another Glass Explorer here. I have a suggestion for you based on your comment “Yes, my eyes leave the road when looking up at the Glass screen, but not nearly as far.”

    Adjust your head when you need to look at the screen while driving. You can line it up with the road and focus on the car ahead of you while looking at the screen.

    As for the “distracted driving” nonsense, I’m with you. Pretty much anything stupid you can do on Glass while driving (watching youtube, texting, whatever) is SAFER than you can do on your phone. For the phone, you could use your hands to type, where with Glass, you have to say it. For the phone, you HAVE to look away from the road, where with Glass, you don’t. The worst thing I see people do with Glass while driving is having a phonecall or taking a picture. The phonecall is just using Glass as a bluetooth headset, so I don’t see any issues there, and with taking a picture, all they have to do is wink or do a really quick tap (which is as fast or faster than scratching your head, etc. which is totally allowed). The average person is going to use it for calls and navigation, and if it gets to the point where a ton of teens have it (which I doubt because we’ll be on newer versions by then), yeah, they may text, but they won’t be typing, and they can have Glass read the text out loud to them so they don’t even have to read it (and don’t have to install an app to read it for them like you tend to on phones).

  8. Kevin, I thought you had a Chevy Volt?! Great points from both sides of the argument. I agree that people need to be smart about how they use any technology in a vehicle or handle other distractions. A little common sense goes a long way. And yes, I realize common sense is not so common any more.

    1. Oh, the Volt is still our primary car. I’ve always had a second car that I barely put miles on. Current one is a Fiat 500c Abarth. Lots of fun to drive, with or without Glass! ;)

  9. One point that needs to be pointed out is, police cause more distracted driving accidents then any other group of driver. What is the difference between texting and police using the laptops while driving or even worse while speeding to a call.

  10. lachelle anderson Tuesday, February 25, 2014

    I should make an android app that detects jealous, cynic assholes and outlines them in your field of vision ! So that’s an interesting post, thanks for your share

Comments have been disabled for this post