3 Comments

Summary:

The first traffic case for Google Glass is over but the law is still entirely unclear over whether drivers can wear the device — the uncertainty is a problem because Glass may offer safety features.

drivesafe for google glass

A California woman who received a ticket for wearing Google Glass while driving finally got her day in court — and she won. According to NBC, a traffic official threw out the case due to a lack of evidence that the electronic eyewear was active while she was driving.

This ends an affair that drew national attention in October when 42-year-old Cecilia Abadie used social media to share news of her ticket, which she received after an officer pulled her over for driving 85 miles an hour in her Prius. According to Abadie, the Google Glass on her face only activated when she looked up at the officer.

Abadie may have beat the ticket, which came with a fine of up to $300, but the ruling does little to clear up whether or not it is legal to use the device while driving.

The issue in the case was whether Google Glass should be classified as a screen or monitor under a California law that forbids drivers from viewing a:

television receiver, a video monitor, or a television or video screen, or any other similar means of visually displaying a television broadcast or video signal that produces entertainment or business applications, is operating and is located in the motor vehicle at a point forward of the back of the driver’s seat [...]

Other states have similar laws that restrict the use of screens and monitors, including, in some states, the Mercedes-Benz Splitview system that shows navigation info to the driver but entertainment to the passenger.

The legal uncertainty over Google Glass is problematic because the technology could actually improve driver safety by, for instance, offering a system to prevent a driver from falling asleep at the wheel.

  1. it’s very similar to texting and driving; they’re going to have a hard time proving if the person is even using the device. I think they should just outlaw it from even being out. Thanks for the post!!

    Share
    1. Michael Jackson Saturday, February 1, 2014

      There are a lot of differences between using Glass and using a phone for texting. With the Glass your eyes never leave the road and it can be activated with voice commands, with texting you are looking down and trying to hit the right keys. If you ban Glass then all the other electronic aids in modern cars should be banned also. Add to that the enforcement issues and I think they should just leave well enough alone unless compelling evidence shows that it is a danger. Right now there is no evidence and banning things just because is wrong, Un American, and repressive.

      Share
      1. I understand what you’re saying, and I appreciate your comment very much. However, there have been no studies (from what I hear) proving whether or not glass is dangerous or safe. At this point, im leaning towards believing that it is dangerous bc while people may not be looking down, they will be focusing their visual attention on places other than the road. Of course, that is just what I believe at this point (I have no proof, again no research has been done). The studies will have to be performed. Also, I don’t think it’s an issue of freedom. With new technologies, there will need to be new regulations. That’s just the way it is. Obviously, it’ll be up for a vote at some point. I just wanted to raise awareness. Thanks for the comment

        Share

Comments have been disabled for this post