2 Comments

Summary:

Europe’s digital chief is already claiming that “newly disadvantaged U.S. startups” should move across the Atlantic — but a similar net neutrality disaster could still happen in the EU, if key proposals aren’t tightened up.

Neelie Kroes

As net neutrality goes down in flames stateside…

Kroes, the European Commissioner in charge of the digital economy, has a point. The potential end of net neutrality rules is going to be really bad for U.S. consumers and startups alike (as my colleague Stacey Higginbotham has noted, the likes of Google and Netflix are actually winners in this scenario, as they have deep pockets).

However, some may dispute Kroes’s characterization of Europe as a safe haven. The Commission recently adopted proposals (that need to be ratified this year) that many see as falling short of promising true net neutrality.

Specifically:

“Providers of content, applications and services and providers of electronic communications to the public should therefore be free to conclude specialised services agreements on defined levels of quality of service as long as such agreements do not substantially impair the general quality of internet access services.”

In other words, ISPs should be able to charge content providers — offering, say, IPTV or videoconferencing services — for joining a new fast lane, as long as the regular internet doesn’t suffer. As network investment would probably gravitate towards that fast lane, good luck with maintaining the quality of all the other traffic over time.

One major point in Kroes’s favor is this: the European broadband scene is for the most part much more competitive than that in the U.S. – there are simply more players in most areas, making lock-in less of an issue. On top of that, another part of her telecoms reforms would ensure that people can switch provider at no penalty if they think they’re not getting a good-enough service, so there would arguably be a good incentive to keep everything running smoothly.

But that’s about consumption. On the supply side, there’s still a good deal of scope in there for replication of the scenario the U.S. now faces, with big players able to outspend the minnows and their pesky innovation, and buy their way into “free with the package” prominence. The devil is in the details, and fans of competition will be hoping for the language of the EU proposals to be tightened up before they hit the European Parliament for a vote.

If Europe really does get net neutrality, that will be the right time to start crowing.

  1. this is the world but the competion is very important about world’s life

    Share
    1. Valentine North Wednesday, January 15, 2014

      Yes, and despite what the article says, there’s hardly any competition between USA’s ISPs.
      In my small town, in an European country, I have a choice of three cable ISP’s and four mobile ISP’s (only one offers both). Cheapest I can get is 30 mbps for ~4USD/month.

      Share
      1. Sebastiaan Arnoldus Noordam Friday, February 7, 2014

        the article said that the EU had more competition in this market than the US it never said there was much competition in the US

        Share
  2. There goes innovation. I live in Ohio, and I can see the writing on the wall. First, there was radio, and amateur radio was all the rage. Now radio is a festering cesspool filled with blowhards while the bandwidth left for amateur radio is crowded. Then there was television and public access. Now the internet is going to turn into another medium limited to large financial interests and corporate schemes. If Europe keeps their internet open, then Europe will win the day.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post