1 Comment

A federal judge has thrown out a consumer lawsuit against Apple, which alleged that the gadget-maker betrayed the trust of iPhone and iPad owners by allowing apps to scoop up their data and track them without consent. U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh axed the 3-year-old case because none of the plaintiffs could prove they relied on Apple’s privacy policy in the first place. Indeed, as she pointed out, none of them could prove they had even read it – and that’s interesting from a legal perspective, because she rejected the ticking of the “Agree” box on iTunes accounts as evidence of genuinely informed consent.

  1. Yet, as a consumer, you are “required” to tick off the “Agree” box to utilize such services and in turn, protect Apple. Is Apple not also assuming that ticking of the “Agree” box on iTunes accounts constitute consent/approval?

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post