3 Comments

Summary:

Last summer’s rumors of cable consolidation are back in the spotlight. But if the industry consolidates, it’s not about television, but about what you’ll pay for broadband that regulators should focus on.

Given the rumors that Comcast is talking with regulators to see if it could find a way to buy Time Warner Cable and that Liberty Media’s John Malone is eyeing some kind of Charter and Time Warner Cable tie up, this summer’s hand-wringing over cable consolidation is still in play.

As my colleague Om Malik explained in a post in July, Malone may have set this off, but it is an opportune time for the industry to consolidate given the demand for broadband generated by over-the-top services such as Netflix and Hulu. The cable guys don’t compete against each other in a given geographic footprint, but instead, against the telcos. And when it comes to broadband, the telcos are losing. As Om wrote back in July:

But the future isn’t about linear, old-styled video. Instead, it is about broadband and broadband-enabled video. The cable companies — at least in the U.S. — have the fastest pipes into majority of homes. They are faster than phone companies and have a deeper footprint. The new technologies are ensuring that they can keep increasing the speed of their broadband networks.

Netflix, Hulu and YouTube are programming our video watching behavior — any amount of video, anytime, anywhere on any screen, as long as there is broadband. The more we watch internet video, more bandwidth we need. The fact, that cable companies (big and small) have already started to meter broadband and are putting limits on the networks; we are only on the cusp of seeing a big inflation in internet access costs.

So the cable industry, if it can consolidate, gets access to the most important pipe coming into people’s homes (after power and water) and the fewer cable companies there are, the more unified the rate structure might appear. So today Comcast has a cap, but Time Warner Cable doesn’t. However, if Time Warner Cable gets bought by Comcast or Charter, both of which have caps, that unlimited broadband from TWC goes by the wayside.

But consolidation in cable is going to take a lot of creativity, as the regulatory environment is unclear. Comcast may be looking for ways to swallow Time Warner Cable or Malone may make his play with Charter, but whatever deal goes down, the Department of Justice and other regulators will want to have a say. And no one is clear exactly what that say might be yet. From a Stifel Nicolaus research note:

Our sense is the DOJ and FCC would have concerns about the market fallout of expanded cable concentration and vertical integration, in a broadband world where cable appears to have the upper hand over wireline telcos in most of the country (i.e., outside of the Verizon FiOS and other fiber-fed areas). We suspect the government would raise objections about the potential for Comcast-TWC bullying of competitors and suppliers, given the extent and linkages of their cable/broadband distribution, programming control, and broadcast ownership.

Looks like regulators might have some of the same concerns we do.

  1. Not sure how consolidation is an issue for most of us. Not like we have a choice in cable companies.

    Share
  2. A couple of your remarks jump out: A couple of your remarks jump out:

    1. “And when it comes to broadband, the telcos are losing”

    This is conventional wisdom, but it’s not factual. Cable is or isn’t holding its own against telco broadband at the moment, depending on what you count. according to the new subscriber data. AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest are adding customers for for their VDSL2+ and GPON services faster than cable is, although the gross market shares for cable vs. telco are stable because of ADSL defections. When uptake approaches saturation, they know that all it takes to get new customers is more fiber. They’re proved this to themselves and it’s no mystery.

    2. “…the future isn’t about linear, old-styled video. Instead, it is about broadband and broadband-enabled video.”

    The long term future may very well be about broadband-enabled video, but we don’t get there unless the cable companies can deal with their existential threat. So the present is about survival, and the threat is spiraling programming costs. There are 100s of cable companies, but only one ESPN, so the more cable consolidates, the better they can deal with their real enemy. Sports is super-important in TV because it’s the only thing that people don’t time-shift, so in the sense all the TiVo users who don’t like sports get to pay for all the commercials they skip by contributing to ESPN and the other content conglomerates. If you guys weren’t so computer-centric, you’d appreciate that cable bills are driven more by Hollywood than by the Internet.

    3. “…we are only on the cusp of seeing a big inflation in internet access costs.”

    The only thing that would make that happen, realistically, is an explosion in programming costs that the cable companies and other triple-players feel they can defray by raising broadband prices to cover their real expense. And there’s only so far they can go before people say “screw it, I’ll just use the phone.” LTE, DBS, and VDSL2+ all have a moderating effect on cable, even if they don’t score highest on Speedtest. At the end of the day it’s about value anyhow.

    You should check what my colleague Jeff Eisenach wrote about this on TechPolicyDaily.com, he knows the ins and outs of the content biz:

    http://www.techpolicydaily.com/communications/twc-comcast-rumors-signal-cable-rollup-lets-hope/

    Share
  3. edmundsingleton Monday, November 25, 2013

    There seem to be one thing that all broadcast news rooms have in common, overly made-up women on camera…

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post