9 Comments

Summary:

Samsung shared some its strategic plans with investors on Wednesday with a surprise: The company will design its own 64-bit core for mobile chips, just as Apple does. Super high-res displays are also in the works but do we need them?

Exynos

After building processors based on ARM Holdings intellectual property for years, Samsung says it will create its own 64-bit core for mobile chips. The company is also pushing forward in its display technology for mobile devices, expecting to bring 4k displays to phones in 2015 and continuing to work on flexible AMOLED screens. The information came from Samsung’s Analyst Day event on Wednesday, as noted by Android Beat.

samsung 64 bit

Based on the slidedeck snaps that Android Beat captured, Samsung didn’t disclose when it plans to debut silicon using its own core. It does appear that Samsung will transition first to 64-bit ARM chips and then follow up with its own processor.

At that point, Samsung would be even more like Apple in that it is customizing the design of its chips. Other device makers typically purchase “off the shelf” chips from Qualcomm, Nvidia and others. Given how Samsung is trying to gain more control over its hardware, software and services, I suspect that chips with Samsung cores would only be in Samsung devices, but we’ll see.

The display news isn’t surprising to me but I’m still not sold on extremely high-resolution screens in small devices. Why? I’m not yet convinced the benefit of packing more pixels into an inch — Samsung is shooting for 560 pixels per inch (PPI) in 2014 — is worth the trade-off in powering such a screen. And if 560 PPI wasn’t enough, Samsung says the following year should bring 4k displays to phones.

Depending on the definition you use, that’s a screen resolution of 3840 × 2160 pixels. Let’s assume this shows up on a 5-inch handset and do the math. We’re talking about a whopping 881 pixels per inch! If the human eye can’t resolve individual pixels around 320 PPI when holding a phone at a typical distance, what’s the benefit here?

Perhaps its just bragging rights, much like the race to the first curved glass phone. We’ll see when Samsung delivers on its plans and if the company’s efforts actually improve our mobile devices.

  1. This is indicative of the difference between Apple and Samsung. Apple doesn’t go for pointless, gimmicky features or specs just for the purposes of “look what we can do!”. Apple is content to just do what’s actually useful and sufficient. This leads to a simple, efficient product that anybody can pick up and just use. Samsung caters too much to the tech afficiandos and only holds its market share because of their low pricing compared to Apple. If Apple were to match them in price, Samsung would be gone pretty dang quick.

    Share
    1. Why don’t apple price their stuff cheaper then? They have this habit of pricing mid range stuff at high range prices and hoping people wont know the difference, at least Samsung is competitively priced.

      Share
  2. Except human DO resolve individual pixels more than 320 PPI. Try print something with different DPI setting (300/600/1200) and see the difference.

    For me the change from 300 to 600 is a huge improvement of quality while 600 to 1200 is not as big but the difference is there.

    Share
  3. What is simply ridiculous about this is that the OS Samsung uses will not be 64-bit compatible… Android is lightyears behind in 64-bit implementation. Considering everything it seems rather DUMB!.

    Share
  4. Please iSheep. Do u forget Samung makes Apples processors, memory and a lot of there screens…

    Share
  5. Hmmmm….

    1 – Samsung is minting Apple’s proprietary A7 64 bit core.

    2 – Samsung is a legendary IP thief.

    3 – How much will Samsung rip off this time?

    The whole world is watching.

    Share
  6. Human eye can still tell the differences. Trying comparing a 400pdi to the REAL object. You can tell the difference. What is the DPI of real object?

    Share
  7. I am surprised the author failed to discern the real reason for a 4K display: what obviously follows is 4K outputted via HDMI 2.0 or DisplayPort to an external display with 4K resolution. Of course it’s a head-scratcher where a 5″ display is concerned.

    And at least with Samsung they won’t charge you $30 or $40 for a $5 micro-HDMI cable adapter.

    Share
  8. Two words. Oculus rift. Thanks Samsung

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post