9 Comments

Summary:

Twitter looks to be experimenting with a new account that will provide breaking news alerts to users — but why does it need to do this when the whole network functions as a breaking news alert system already?

2583886589_01ce541f8a_z

With its IPO waiting in the wings, new features seem to be spilling out of Twitter’s headquarters in San Francisco almost daily. Some are clearly designed to kiss up to the television industry — since that’s where the money seems to be — while others have a more subtle mission: namely, to convince people to use the service more. User growth and engagement is one of the metrics Twitter is probably most focused on as it prepares to go public.

To that end, we have seen the launch of two interesting Twitter accounts in the past week: one, called @MagicRecs, was an experiment in suggesting new users to follow, based on whether other people in your stream were also following an account. The second, called @EventParrot, looks an awful lot like a real-time news alert service that sends you direct messages — the same way that @MagicRecs did — when there is a news event that it thinks you might be interested in.

More notifications to keep you engaged

The @MagicRecs account was recently promoted to an official Twitter feature, which presumably means the experiment went well. And while Twitter hasn’t confirmed that @EventParrot is an official test account, the profile has very similar wording to the profile for @MagicRecs, and it seems like a fairly obvious move for the company to make as it continues to roll out new types of notifications. (Update: @EventParrot is verified now, which presumably means it’s official)

Event Parrot

My first reaction when I heard about @EventParrot was that I don’t need any more real-time news notifications (or any more notifications at all, for that matter — I am already drowning in notifications). Why create a real-time news alert service within Twitter when the entire network is a massive real-time alert service? Admittedly, it’s signal-to-noise ratio sometimes leaves a little to be desired, but it has already become something like a news-wire service for many users.

Are notifications going to help or hinder growth?

But Twitter isn’t concerned about me, or other media-industry types who are so-called “power users.” If they were, then they would make it a lot easier to create and manage lists, which is the primary way in which I and other smart Twitter users like Andy Carvin of NPR control the signal-to-noise problem. But they have repeatedly moved lists around so they are hard to find and use.

What Twitter is more concerned about isn’t just the hundreds of millions of people who don’t belong to the network yet — it’s the millions of users who have signed up for an account and never use it, or use it only once or twice a month. Those people need some reason to keep coming back, so that Twitter can count them as “active” and show them TV ads, and justify its $15-billion-plus market value. Maybe it’s notifications about new shows, maybe it’s news alerts.

The risk inherent in this approach, of course, is that all of the stuff Twitter is doing to boost its engagement and make itself a friend to TV networks — whether it’s notifications or auto-play video clips or pre-roll ads on the embedded video — just increases the noise level for many users. In some cases, it could even drive them away or cause them to use the service less. What will Twitter do then?

Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Shutterstock / Feng Yu

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Because Twitter is not a real-time news service. A real-time news service would not …

    … be constantly fighting itself on accuracy where new Tweets of current information battle Re-Tweets of old information.

    … have no ombudsman to correct and retract inaccuracies.

    … be reliant on early account eyewitnesses which are more about “near or at the incident when it occurred” than “an attempt at rigorous journalism”.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=472792489478732&set=a.231934930231157.53382.100002439565782&type=3&theater

    1. That doesn’t mean it isn’t a real-time news service — it just isn’t the kind of real-time news service that you like.

      1. The kind of real-time news service I (and probably many people) like is accurate and up-to-date; when it is not, it is accountable.

        1. then it cannot possible be real-time

  2. William Mougayar Thursday, October 10, 2013

    I would have liked Twitter to provide keyword based alerts or an aggregation of search terms into a single stream. That way I can go there and check it.

    But maybe, as you point out, that is a power user feature which they will ignore.

  3. Interesting read! Thanks for sharing :)

  4. Just out of curiosity, you seem way too hip not to use tools like Tweetdeck, etc. in order to get around the list control problems. You are using Tweetdeck, right?

  5. I must applaud Twitter for both of these opt-in “services”. They have already proved informative, useful, and unobtrusive.

  6. Re. topic I wonder two things. First, how can people trust someone that reports something. Who can filter all those millions of tweets for accuracy, anti-spam, defamation, hatred and other illegal things. Impossible on a medium that is not manually censored.

    Second, if someone on Twitter posts a link to already launched news from other service, how is Twitter unique real-time service and not one of many portals that just re-emit news. Where is Twitter Unique Selling Point re. news service. We have tons of RSS, Google News and similar sites.

    Twitter forces itself to become something that it wasn’t intended to be in the first place. Wewill see how investors will react upon realising this

Comments have been disabled for this post