6 Comments

Summary:

A House member is proposing a new law that would give viewers more power over which channels appear in their TV packages, and end some hardball tactics that arise in disputes between broadcasters and cable providers.

Source: Shutterstock / Refat
photo: Refat

In the aftermath of a fee dispute that saw CBS vanish from millions of households with Time Warner Cable for 31 days, a U.S. House of Representatives member is touting a bill that would ban such blackouts and also give viewers more say in which stations are included in their cable bundles.

The proposed legislation by Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), reported by Hillicon Valley, would also forbid broadcasters from blocking certain viewers from online access to shows, which CBS did as a retaliatory measure in the Time Warner Cable. It would also give consumers the power to drop broadcast networks from their TV packages, and forbid broadcasters from forcing cable and satellite companies to buy extra channels when they license broadcast stations like CBS, NBC or ABC.

The bill in many ways mirrors similar Senate legislation proposed in May by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) to break up the TV industry “bundle” business model, which relies on force-feeding channels to viewers even if they don’t want to buy them.

While the bills have popular appeal, they are unlikely to become law anytime soon, given the competing lobbying power of the broadcasters and the cable industry in Washington. In response to the proposed law, CBS and others claim that the market should decide the price of TV.

In the meantime, the price of TV bundles is likely to climb even higher as a result of sports leagues like the NFL that, in recent years, have been able to command price increases that far exceed the rate of inflation.

  1. cut the cable. go totally streaming. then cable and their high costs and hidden fees become a non-issue. everything I want to view, including sports, can be obtained without being blackmailed into what the cable industry wants to force on me.

    Share
    1. Amen Nick. I cut cable in the 90’s and never looked back and have more quality content now than I can watch.

      Share
    2. your low cost streaming is already being subsidized by the the revenue the broadcasters are getting from cable companies and dish companies. Remove that revenue stream from broadcasters ( cutting the cords)and they will raise the prices of you recieveing the programming via the internet.

      Share
  2. Now there will be no need for the cable packages, the need of it will not be there. The demand for Online tV has increased a lot!

    Share
  3. Comcast/Xfinity won’t allow me to have the Al Jazeera channel removed from my “package” unless i change my entire bundle. What the hell is going on here? We’re paying through our noses for these bundles and we don’t have a say what we DON’T want in our bundle?? ESPECIALLY that vile-ridden Al Jazeera TV??

    Share
  4. I refuse to pay for cable if I cannot pay for only the channels I want. As time goes on I miss live TV much less and now I am happy without it.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post