6 Comments

Summary:

Samsung’s Galaxy Gear will reportedly support non-Samsung smartphones and tablets once those devices get Bluetooth 4.0 LE support. That’s great, but how will the Samsung-specific features translate over? Non-Samsung devices don’t have S-Voice and S-Health, for example.

Samsung Galaxy Gear Multiple watches
photo: Samsung

Samsung will eventually make its Galaxy Gear smartwatch compatible with non-Samsung phones reports Dan Rowinski at ReadWrite. Why couldn’t it do so at first? There’s actually a reasonable explanation for that, but I’m not sold that buyers of the Galaxy Gear for a non-Samsung phone or tablet will get the same experience as those who do own a Samsung device.

Galaxy Note 3 and Galaxy Gear

Since the Galaxy Gear uses Bluetooth 4.0 LE, it actually requires Android 4.3 on a smartphone or tablet. That makes complete sense to me. Google only recently added support for this Bluetooth spec with Android 4.3 and few devices actually have it right now. But there are some. Google’s own Nexus 7 and Nexus 10 tablets, for example, run Android 4.3, as do older Nexus phones thanks to recent software updates. Most don’t have the hardware for Bluetooth 4.0 LE, however.

That new Nexus 7 tablet actually does have it, so theoretically, Samsung could have had the Galaxy Gear support Google’s tablet from day one. But it doesn’t. And I’m not surprised: Samsung is succeeding largely because it is “re-branding” Google Android devices as Galaxy phones and tablets that run TouchWiz.

Nexus 7 rear

But there’s another key point that comes to mind: Some of the Galaxy Gear functions are very Samsung specific. Need an example? Aside from the touchscreen, you can use your voice as input for the Gear. Makes sense to me; it’s a great way to overcome the issue of input on the small screen of a smartwatch. So how does Samsung manage the voice input? Through its own S-Voice app.

Wait. There is no S-Voice app on non-Samsung devices. Nor is there an S-Health app for non-Samsung devices; the Gear uploads its exercise tracking data to S-Health.

S-Health on the Galaxy S 4

So one of three things has to happen for a non-Samsung device owner to get the full benefit of a Galaxy Gear smartwatch in this case. Let’s consider S-Voice.

One, Samsung could launch S-Voice for all Android devices. Hmmm…. give up a Samsung-branded service? I don’t think so.

Two, it could re-engineer the Galaxy Gear software to use Google’s own native voice features. Ah, but to do that, it would have to license the tech from Google. Yes, Android is free to use, but Google’s software — think Gmail and Google Play access for example — isn’t. I believe that the Galaxy Gear apps are coming directly through Samsung, which means the company hasn’t yet opted to license the Google bits such as Google Play and other Google services for the Android-powered smartwatch.

Three, it could sell the Galaxy Gear with fewer features to those who don’t have a Galaxy device. But I think the watch is already a tough sell for most at $299; who’s going to pay that much for less functionality?

Galaxy Gear smartwatch

Clearly, I’m just musing out loud here after reading the news. Perhaps Samsung has all of the details in place to offer the Galaxy Gear to non-Samsung device owners with ways around the challenges. Rest assured, there would be challenges, which is the ultimate point.

First and foremost, I think Samsung phone and tablet owners will always get the most benefit out of a Samsung companion product. And that fits in with Samsung’s overall strategy of dominating the Android space.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Joel McLaughlin Thursday, September 5, 2013

    I like the idea, but I am with you Kevin and I am NOT a fan of what Samsung does to Android on their phones. I was thinking about a Galaxy Note 3 for my next device but I really don’t like TouchWiz and don’t need half the things they are cramming on the device.

  2. Stephen Hamilton Thursday, September 5, 2013

    Samsung is getting it right. I use an HTC and will change to the Galaxy Note 3 shortly. I can get used to the phone and by the time I can get a Samsung Galaxy Gear they probably will have all the initial updates and problems solved. My big need for a watch is to know what day of the week it is now that I am retired and work part-time. hen I do work they don’t want me to openly use a Smartphone. The Galaxy Gear solves that issue as well as getting calls and messages while driving. I don’t text so that is not an issue although I do get emergency texts alerting me to all sorts of issues. That should be as easy as just looking at my watch to see what time it is. I do think I could get a side benefit by checking my exercise tracked and watch my high blood pressure activity.

  3. I’m a watch wearer but these smart watches do not appeal to me. That said I think the Qualcom Toq is the most interesting of the current crop. It supposedly works with ICS and above and will also work with IOS. I like the display tech and it is supposed to have several days of charge while being always on. I don’t understand why samsung feels the need to add a camera to the watch. That seems unnecessary with the cameras available on the S4 and the Note 3.

  4. Richard Garrett Thursday, September 5, 2013

    Root?

  5. I think the watch is to much money. But that being said my major problem is that Samsung seems to be taking some of Apples worst features (of which there are many).

    I have a big problem with companies making their stuff proprietary. I have a note 2 now, but I am not sure about the watch because I might get something else down the road. I’m not going to spend $300 on a watch and then be forced to stay with Samsung phones regardless of what else is out there.

  6. I made it work in a couple of non samsung phones, using gear superfixer form the market, I did not even need the samsung account

Comments have been disabled for this post