1 Comment

Summary:

VMworld continued to preach its software-defined data center message, unveiling network and storage virtualization tools and annoying its network and storage partners. Coopetition reigns supreme.

vmworld

VMware dominated headlines last week —  as nearly 25,000 customers and partners flocked to VMworld 2013 to hear the company’s software defined data center pitch and how it will attack cloud computing in the Amazon Web Services era. AWS, after all, started out as the game-changer cloud for startups but is gaining momentum among enterprise accounts where VMware’s server virtualization is entrenched. VMware needed to make a case that it can do better outside customer firewalls than it has to date.

The big if unsurprising news was that vCloud Hybrid Services, VMware’s answer to Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure, is now broadly available and embraces the open-source Cloud Foundry platform as a service — which after all started off as a VMware project before it moved to Pivotal. Less clear is what exactly VMware support for OpenStack will be. OpenStack launched more than 3 years ago as an open source response to VMware inside the data center (private clouds) and AWS in public cloud.

VMworld 2011 show floorSince that time, VMware joined the OpenStack community by virtue of its purchase last year of Nicira. But the OpenStack cloud crowd is skeptical — to put it kindly — about whether VMware will throw its full weight behind the technology; ignore it or try to smother it. VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger promised to support OpenStack through a component based approach with its NSX network virtualization, vSphere server virtualization and vSAN storage virtualization products. Not exactly sure what that means, really, and I don’t think I’m alone in that.

OpenStack pioneer Chris Kemp told GigaOM he was excited to see how VMware will use OpenStack but had some questions. “There’s a lot of technology that [VMware] built that, frankly, has no place in a cloud that’s powering cloud-native applications … and they’re going to have to reconcile that,” said Kemp, CEO of Nebula and former CTO of NASA.

Looking at the competitive landscape, VMware touts its push into storage and networking virtualization as the right thing for customers but it also put the hurt on existing relationships with networking and storage partners, most notably but not at all limited to Cisco . Obviously the whole notion of VMware virtualizing all the hardware in sight was fated to cross hardware-oriented partners (with the exception of VMware mothership EMC).

Here’s the main takeaway. Legacy IT vendors — including VMware, Microsoft, IBM, HP, Cisco, HP, you name it — are scrambling  to bring existing customers over to their respective version of cloud while also trying to preserve their base “on-premises” businesses. To do that they’re fighting not just Amazon but each other for more of that business. At the same time,  Amazon, aka “the book seller,” doesn’t have that legacy IT to protect so it just keeps forging ahead.

My guess is that Amazon itself will eventually get disrupted — everyone does — but I don’t think it’s going to be by vCloud Hybrid Services. Microsoft Azure, with its scale and resources, has a better shot IMHO (provided it gets its  house in order). Still more likely, Amazon’s nemesis will come out of left field. I mean, who saw Amazon coming 7 years ago?

Podcast plug: Listen up people!

Oh, and if you want to hear more from Nebula’s Kemp — not only about VMware and OpenStack, but the cool tech stuff NASA did behind closed doors (it did Google Glass-like stuff way before Google) and his experiences in weightlessness — check out our Structure Show podcast.

More news from around the interwebs

From GigaOM: Microsoft lets shareholder activist ValueAct into the tent. 

From VentureBeat: VMware fires a massive volley against virtualization upstarts

From Ben Kepes: Out with the old, in with the new: VMware’s new reality and the carnage to come.

From CloudPro: VMware and Pivotal to develop Cloud Foundry-based PaaS offering

From ITWorld:  Salesforce.com’s Benioff lays out future strategies

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. If someone understands both the openstack and VMware technology deep enough and have hands on experience like me, he or she will easily understand and agree that openstack is ametaurish whereas VMware is a solid technology built for production environment. If you want to compare openstack with any VMware technology compare it with vcloud director. Both are virtual machine orchestration platform and provides abstraction fr underlying compute and storage capability. But whereas vcloud director is thoroughly tested , integrates tightly with the hypervisor, has 24×7 professional support etc, openstack lacks in many of these. Also note runnin a unmodified guestOS , as is the case with running it on a hypervisor like ESXi, will be always faster and better than running it on a para virtualized platform like KVM. Things like distributed resource scheduler or vmotion are very limited on openstack or KVM platform as compared to VSphere. Given the large amount of limitations it is ultimately a business decision for a company on wether to maintain a pool of dedicated developers/consultants to build and maintain their own production ready openstack environment or pay the licensing and support cost to VMware. Either way this is a question that companies have faced in the past when selecting between Unix or Windows or Linux as their chosen OS platform to run enterprise application and time and again it has been proven that businesses finds it makes more sense to leverage external help , so that it can focus on its core business. It does not make any sense for average businesses to keep writing your own kernel modules, libraries, OS patches and upgrade modules.

Comments have been disabled for this post