8 Comments

Summary:

Qualcomm is hoping to prove that eight cores are not always better than four, with a short clip comparing its latest quad-core Snapdragon processor to the octa-core competition.

Qualcomm-s-HDTV-and-Tablet-Snapdragon-S4-Processors-2

The processor wars are heating up. While Qualcomm has had its chips in most major new smartphones for a while now, MediaTek has been trying to catch up, announcing the first true octa-core processor last month. Apparently Qualcomm isn’t impressed, and released a video to show exactly what it thinks of MediaTek’s next-generation tech. Check it out in the clip below.

You might have noticed that MediaTek is never actually mentioned in the video, but the color scheme and font Qualcomm uses in the text for “our competitor” makes things pretty clear.

So why is Qualcomm going after MediaTek in this video instead of, say, Samsung? If you recall, just last month MediaTek announced the first true octa-core processor. I know what you’re thinking — Samsung already has one those. But Samsung’s octa-core Exynos chip can only activate half of its cores at once, while the new MediaTek chips can run all eight simultaneously, which is what makes it a “true” octa-core.

Now, according to Qualcomm, each generation it rebuilds its cores to improve performance, which has made for a 170 percent increase from its first single-core Snapdragon processor to its latest quad-core Snapdragon 800. The competition (MediaTek), meanwhile, continues to use the same Cortex-A7 architecture each time, and is merely increasing the number of cores. And according to Qualcomm, of the top 20 apps in China, 85 percent are using two cores at most. The other 15 percent, meanwhile, “barely touch the rest.” So by this logic, you’re better off with less cores that are better built than a bunch of lesser cores that largely go unused.

To illustrate how this works, Qualcomm breaks out a Guitar Hero-inspired demonstration, showing the dramatic difference in performance between its first-generation processor and where it is today. In it the graphics are detailed and moving along at a rapid clip. Then to illustrate the competition, Qualcomm slows the demonstration down, drops the graphical detail, and adds four additional lanes that go unused. It’s a pretty striking difference.

Keep in mind this video comes from Qualcomm, so it’s not like you’re seeing a real-world comparison in power between the two chips. But it’s pretty fun to watch, and a rather bold statement.

This doesn’t mean that all hope is lost for MediaTek. Earlier this month popular benchmarking app AnTuTu released data showing Samsung’s octa-core Exynos processor coming in at the head of the race, just above Qualcomm’s quad-core Snapdragon 600 chip. And while it may have won by just a hair, the octa-core processor did indeed come out on top. So it’ll be an interesting battle, but we’ll have to wait to until we can test the finished products before a true winner can be determined.

For more from Qualcomm, Rob Chandhok, president of Qualcomm Internet Services and senior vice president of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. will lead a discussion on the Internet of Everything at Mobilize, October 16th in San Francisco.

  1. So by this logic, you’re better off with FEWER (rather than less) cores that are better built than a bunch of lesser cores that largely go unused.

    Share
    1. Yes Sir.
      8 High end core > 4 High end core > 8 low end cores

      Share
      1. So u mean to say that intels i5 @2.53 ghz iz better thn i7@1.8 ghz.. :P

        Share
  2. that’s a pretty ugly competitive move, just because Qualcomm is in the big league while Mediatek is an underdog in the mobile processors war, whose main market are those people who would opt for affordability, does not give Qualcomm the right to slam on Mediatek’s advance, what Mediatek does that Qualcomm can’t or won’t, is that Mediatek is able to market their newer and higher-end chips at an insanely cheaper price

    to fully appreciate a Qualcomm phone, you’d have to buy a really expensive phone, personally i’d rather buy a cheaper quad-core Mediatek powered phone than a same-priced under-powered single-core Qualcomm powered phone

    Share
  3. I still dont get it, snnapy is claiming that their cores are better than those eight? Or at least having less…but then again they’re using 4 cores. Thats more than 2…what?

    Share
  4. Well when SD were ahead in the my-chip-has-more-cores-than-yours game they were pretty fine with the concept of more-cores = better=performance. Now that they’re behind in this game, they’re crying like a baby. Oh, number of cores dont matter. Sounds like a sore loser or a little baby or both.

    Share
  5. So why qualcom making quad core processors.. Make a single core processor with 8ghz high end processor.. :P

    Share
    1. are you insane or what?
      gtfo….
      multi threading….

      Share

Comments have been disabled for this post