The police want to see how dangerous 3D-printed guns really are — in terms of smuggling them through security checks, but also with a view to perhaps using them themselves.

Liberator parts

Germany’s federal police agencies are buying a 3D printer in order to see whether homemade 3D-printed guns are really a threat. This follows on from the Defense Distributed debacle back in May, when a U.S. libertarian activist briefly posted designs for such things on the web before being ordered to remove them due to export laws.

The purchase of the printer by the German authorities came as a response to a parliamentary question posed by Die Linke (The Left party). The government said the police wanted to see whether ne’er-do-wells could actually make plastic guns that could be smuggled onto planes, and also whether the police might find a use for such technology themselves.

The federal police have also swapped notes with their counterparts in New South Wales, Australia, who have already conducted tests on 3D-printed firearms. I daresay no-one is too concerned about an imminent threat – the Australian police tests suggested that anyone firing a “Liberator” weapon would injure or kill not only their target but also themselves, as the guns have a nasty habit of exploding.

That said, while it’s reportedly not easy to make, the Liberator was only – pardon the pun – a warning shot. Designs and printers will no doubt improve, and it’s all too easy to predict someone successfully smuggling a viable 3D-printed gun through a security check at some point in the long run.

Personally, though, I’m more intrigued by the idea of police using such weapons themselves. Whatever for?

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Untraceable gun to drop at a criminal’s body?

  2. taxed departments Tuesday, July 23, 2013

    “Personally, though, I’m more intrigued by the idea of police using such weapons themselves. Whatever for?”

    This really is a silly thing to write considering the authors previous acknowledgment that the Liberator is “…only a warning shot. Designs and printers will no doubt improve.”

    But lets delve into one possible, fiscally responsible possibility of why.

    Just think of the reduction in taxes if officers could be equipped with a firearms that could be produced at 1/10th of the cost (a guess…I have no citation) of purchasing conventional small arms. There is also a very reliable lower receiver for AR15 style weapons that can be printed. The rest of the rifle can be bought over the counter for a very customized weapon at a much lower cost once past the initial investment of the “printer.” Due to the mil-spec nature of AR15 parts, they could customize a weapon in short order based on mission requirements without having to own a different rifle for every occasion.

Comments have been disabled for this post