8 Comments

Summary:

With the help of some maps from Mosaik, GigaOM breaks down what AT&T really gets if it acquires Leap. Our conclusion: AT&T is paying a ridiculous price but it probably feels it has no choice.

Mosaik AT&T Leap featured
photo: Mosaik Solutions

I’ve already taken one crack at explaining why AT&T would want to buy regional carrier Leap Wireless. This deal is clearly about spectrum. AT&T wasn’t able to get it by purchasing T-Mobile so it’s hoping to pick up airwaves on a more piecemeal basis by acquiring smaller operators. But how much spectrum will AT&T get and is it worth the extremely high premium AT&T is offering?

Explaining these things is always easier when you can paint a picture. Luckily, the good people at Moasik Solutions, a company that catalogs mobile coverage worldwide, have generated some detailed maps showing the spectrum positions of both operators as well as what the two operators would look like once combined.

Let’s start with Leap, which is known to most of the country by its consumer-facing brand, Cricket Communications. As you can see from the map below, Leap isn’t a nationwide carrier, but it does hold a few key licenses that would make any carrier’s mouth water. It owns valuable spectrum on the dense mid-Atlantic seaboard from Philadelphia down to Richmond, Va. But Leap’s big appeal is west of the Mississippi, where it has 26 MHz or more of PCS, Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) and 700 MHz airwaves — all bands where AT&T wants to build mobile broadband networks — in cities like San Antonio, Houston, Denver, Kansas City, San Diego, Phoenix and Portland, Ore.

Mosaik Leap spectrum

Leap also owns smaller chunks of frequencies in Chicago, Pittsburgh, Memphis, Nashville, Charlotte, New Orleans, Oklahoma City and Salt Lake City. AT&T could put all of those airwaves to work in its 3G HSPA+ and 4G LTE networks. Harvesting that spectrum is almost certainly what AT&T plans given Leap’s primary technology CDMA is entirely incompatible with AT&T’s GSM and HSPA systems.

Now here’s another Mosaik map showing AT&T’s spectrum holdings:

Mosaik AT&T spectrum

As you can see AT&T doesn’t lack for nationwide license coverage (though it hasn’t deployed networks everywhere it has spectrum). In all but the most unpopulated stretches of the American landscape, AT&T holds at least 26 MHz of spectrum, and in densely populated cities that number grows to more than 70 MHz and in many cases over 100 MHz. With more airwaves AT&T has more capacity to build bigger mobile data pipes, and these maps show AT&T is already has quite a lot of capacity. These maps don’t even include the Wireless Communications Services (WCS) airwaves AT&T owns and just got permission to use for LTE.

Here’s Mosaik’s representation of the new spectral landscape if the merger is finalized:

Mosaik AT&T-Leap combined The before and after maps really don’t look that much different right? The after-map definitely gets darker in Leap’s coverage areas, but in most cases those areas were pretty dark to begin with. The point I’m making is AT&T isn’t suddenly going to find itself with a windfall of spectrum in any big cities if this deal closes. You can think of this deal like expensive plastic surgery. AT&T will use Leap’s licenses to surgically enhance its capacity in some areas, but it will still fundamentally be the same operator when the bandages come off.

Here’s another Mosaik map that illustrates that point. It shows everywhere, AT&T (in blue) and Leap (in orange and green) has LTE deployed. Admittedly Leap is just getting starting on its LTE rollout, but the map is still telling. Except for a few towns on the U.S.-Mexico border and a few fingers of coverage outside Tuscon, Ariz., and Houston, there’s nowhere Leap has an LTE network where AT&T doesn’t already have one.

Mosaik AT&T-Leap combined LTE

Is this deal really worth the price?

AT&T isn’t just paying $1.2 billion for Leap – a premium nearly double Leap’s closing price Friday – it’s taking on $2.8 billion in Leap debt. That’s $4 billion to acquire regional spectrum, much of which isn’t in areas where AT&T needs the capacity.

To put that in perspective Verizon just bought the cable companies’ AWS licenses for $3.9 billion, giving it loads of 4G spectrum in nearly every single major city in the country. Verizon will be able to do a lot more with those cable airwaves than AT&T ever could would with Leap’s spectrum. In fact, Verizon is already using its new frequency windfall to build a second nationwide LTE network, which in many places will have twice as much capacity as its first.

You could easily interpret the Leap offer as bad deal for AT&T, but Ma Bell seems to have concluded that the spectrum market is now so tight that airwaves — so long as they’re in the right band — are worth any price. It’s the same calculation that T-Mobile made when it merged with MetroPCS, paying Metro shareholders $1.5 billion and giving them a quarter of the combined company.

When rumors of both the T-Metro and the AT&T-Leap deals surfaced, I dismissed both of them, writing on GigaOM there were practically no advantages for any of the companies involved. I was clearly wrong on both counts, and I’m left eating crow.

But I’m still shocked that this all happened. Why? Because it demonstrates just how much the economics of the mobile industry has fundamentally changed in a little over a year.

Mobile operators used to buy each other for their subscribers, footprints and networks. Cingular bought AT&T to become the single-largest mobile player in the U.S., combining the two companies GSM operations. Verizon bought fellow CDMA operator Alltel to expand into small markets and rural towns all over the country. The one big case where two operators with incompatible networks merged, Sprint-Nextel, is universally regarded as a failure.

But today mobile carriers are buying up their competitors for a single asset only, spectrum. The big four are becoming chop shops, buying up smaller players and stripping them to get at their airwaves.

  1. Great stuff as always, Kevin!

    Share
    1. Kevin Fitchard Tuesday, July 16, 2013

      Thanks Lukas

      Share
  2. i believe the point here is to keep t-mobile from buying leap. leap and metro have similar spectrum but in different markets, so leap spectrum would have filled the deficits just where t-mobile needed it.

    although i expect at some point in the next five years at&t will successfully buy t-mobile.

    Share
    1. Yeah, I’d be curious how much of AT&T’s purchase is a defensive play.

      Share
    2. Kevin Fitchard Tuesday, July 16, 2013

      Hey Tom,

      Think a new administration and a new FCC will be more AT&T-Mo friendly?

      Share
  3. Kevin – Excellent article and great insights. The maps really help tell the story.
    Nit picky edit in the second-to-last paragraph (a missing plural posessive apostrophe): “Cingular bought AT&T to become the single-largest mobile player in the U.S., combining the two companies -> ‘ <- GSM operations."
    Keep up the great work.

    Share
  4. Hi,
    I am a Cricket (leap) customer and I am curious about what this will mean for us…will we be able to keep our same phones and plans or will we pushed into something AT&T will try to offer us? I know the merge wont take place for 6-9 months but I want to have all my ducks in a row when the time comes. On cricket I own one of the newer phones that run on the LTE network so will it be as easy as a sim swap? Further more, what about the people that don’t have phones that have the sim card slot, will they need to get a AT&T phone to keep their service? sorry for all the questions but I am a creature of habit and this is starting to freak me out a little. Thanks in advance =)

    Share
  5. Ceicket uses a CDMA network and ATT uses a GSM network. They will probably keep the existing network for 2 years max while they upgrade there’s. By then though all networks will be transforming to VOLTE so you should be fine for awhile. Look how long it took sprint to shut down the nextel network?

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post