Instagram’s success story is almost cliche by now: Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger were working on an app called Burbn that wasn’t going anywhere, and it was only when they stripped it down to focus on the photos – and Systrom’s girlfriend had the suggestion for adding filters – that things really took off.
Make it fast. Make it beautiful. Make it simple.
So as much as I doubted that Instagram could do the same with video — video is, after all, and entirely different experience with its own unique challenges — it appears Systrom and team may have pulled it off.
Instagram announced Thursday morning in Menlo Park that two and a half years after its launch, and now under Facebook’s umbrella, the company has added video to the mix. You can read our full coverage from the liveblog of the event.
Make it fast
My greatest reservation when it comes to apps doing social video is that if they don’t serve it up fast enough, the experience is practically worthless. As much as I have enjoyed playing with Twitter’s Vine, opening the app to see a feed of buffering videos is a deal-killer.
And Systrom knows this. He spoke at our Roadmap conference in November about how they had always considered adding video to Instagram, but the technology just wasn’t there yet:
“No one wants to sit outside at a ballpark waiting for a video to load while there are 100,000 people around you wandering and you’re trying to get a network signal. It’s hard enough for us to push an image down to you, I can only imagine a moving image,” he said. “[Videos] are just innately harder to produce and consume. In order to consume a video you don’t swing past it and then you’re done. You actually have to sit and engage with it and watch it the full length — I think that’s one of the harder parts of consuming.”
So have things really changed that dramatically in just three years? I wrote earlier this month about my love for recording Vine videos, but noted that Vine might have hit the technology wave of faster networks speeds a little too early. While Vine’s six-second limit and automatic looping makes the videos fun to record, I found myself staring at buffering videos far too often.
We’ll see if videos on Instagram load any faster, but in my brief speed comparisons of Instagram and Vine (on Facebook’s only-OK press WiFi), Instagram is performing remarkably well. The videos have loaded instantaneously. But it’s something we’ll have to judge over time, and the outcome could really make or break the service; that’s something the guys at Instagram seem to understand. Systrom said they’ve worked to start loading the videos before you even call them up in your feed to help things along.
“Our hope is not very long at all,” Systrom said at the press event when asked how long it will take videos will load. “But we have to set expectations. This is day one.”
Make it beautiful
Systrom has said it a million times: Instagram is not a filters app. It’s not a photography app. But there’s no question that the concept of filters, whatever you want to calll them, were key to Instagram’s success. Your brunch photos would look a lot less beautiful without Valencia or Mayfair.
And it appears that filters can work the same way on video for Instagram, as a key differentiation point from Vine. Users can choose the video button next to the main capture button in the app, record up to 15 seconds of footage, add a video-specific filter, stabilize the image, and share to social networks. There are some differences from the photo version, but at its core it looks pretty similar.
And yes, the videos do look better when you put a filter on it.
Make it simple
In a way, the simplicity of video on Instagram isn’t just about the app itself. Yes, videos are easy to record. But what makes video on Instagram pretty killer is that it’s available immediately to 130 million active users already — just imagine the rollout strategy and marketing you can skip right there. This isn’t a new app you have to download; the features are already there, and your social graph is there, too.
So will I ever post another video to Vine? Probably not. If the performance and speed on Instagram is markedly better, and I already have hundreds of followers on Instagram that check the app and give me feedback daily, it’s hard to imagine how Vine could ever compete with that.
Facebook clearly has no qualms about grabbing hot ideas and rapidly rolling out its own version, even if the Facebook version of the app isn’t all that great. (See: Poke versus Snapchat.) But video for Instagram feels different — while it shares many features with Vine, it doesn’t seem like a rapid, one-off copy.