3 Comments

Summary:

Who wants a connected device if it costs a lot more than the “dumb” device? In this week’s podcast we discuss the cost gap and how big companies will use the internet of things.

David_Friedman
photo: Ayla Networks

When it comes to connectivity, it’s clear that people want it and you can build some really cool stuff with connected devices. But right now consumers pay a pretty penny for the extra radios and microcontrollers associated with hooking a door lock, a thermostat or a lightbulb up to a network. The starter set of the Hue lightbulbs costs $200 for example. The connected version of my door lock added $100 to the overall price. And the Nest thermostat is a pocket-draining $250.

Are these devices worth it? I’ve written how I decide whether connectivity justifies the price, but in this week’s podcast Ayla Networks co-founder and CEO David Friedman argues that the cost divide between “smart” and dumb devices will shrink in the next few years, with it costing about $5 to add connectivity to things.

And at that point there’s no reason why you might not have a connected microwave or smoke detector. But not all of this connectivity will serve the consumer. In the case of appliances they might be used by the manufactures for software updates, diagnostics (we’ve talked about this on previous shows) and perhaps to sell you services. So a connected fridge might not buy your groceries but it would offer to ship a replacement water filter to your door, when it sensed yours was past its prime.

(Download this episode)

Internet of Things Show RSS Feed

Listen on SoundCloud

Subscribe in iTunes

Listen on Stitcher

Show notes:
Host: Stacey Higginbotham
Guest: David Friedman, CEO of Ayla Networks

  • Why the world needs yet another platform for connected devices.
  • Big companies are intrigued by the internet of things, so what departments are trying to push the envelope?
  • That high price tag associated with connected devices should shrink in the next few years.
  • When our devices are connected, should we fear for our privacy?

PREVIOUS IoT PODCASTS:

Podcast: Securing the internet of things is like securing our borders. Impossible.

Podcast: How to design a connected device that isn’t a jerk, plus IoT’s recipe for success

Podcast: The history of the internet of things includes a Swedish hockey team and LEGOs

Podcast: Power to the people — and all their connected devices

What you really need to know before buying connected devices

How the internet of things may make parents less worried but more neurotic

Shark Week for the internet of things

What the Internet of Things can learn from Minecraft and Lemmings

Podcast: How IBM uses chaos theory, data and the internet of things to fix traffic

Electric Imp aims to make the Internet of Things devilishly simple

  1. Sounds like a good solution for the high bandwidth home appliances. The majority of connected objects (80%) will however be low throughput and it is not always ideal to rely on WiFis (cannot control the connectivity and only works when in proximity of the gateway). At SIGFOX we focus on the low throughput objects for which we provide out-of-the-box connectivity (no need for local WiFi) at even lower costs than $5.

    Ayla should maybe also interface with SIGFOX :-)

    More info: http://gigaom.com/2012/11/23/does-the-internet-of-things-need-its-own-internet/

    Share
  2. Scott Jenson Tuesday, June 11, 2013

    This was an excellent, excellent podcast. Thanks for the great questions. A few comments:
    1) Smart devices can’t all have their own app, that just can’t scale. What if you buy two different smoke detectors, two apps? I buy the scenario, but not the solution. We need something much simpler are more universal.

    2) The scenarios that will actually first take off are likely much more mundane that we’d like to admit. The point you made about maintenance or improved product design (metrics) are excellent and likely first scenarios

    3) The costs will come down very quickly, so that won’t really be the limiting factor. The more human connection/setup costs will start to be more critical.

    I’ve written about this for OMs Roadmap book, this is a hot space that is more about understanding *where* we want to go, rather than the potential that we can go there. Keep up the great work!

    Share
  3. Ambitious attempt by Ayla, not sure what their software does and why Semiconductor partners would want to give this up to Ayla…

    Look at Arrayent – doing something similar.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post