21 Comments

Summary:

Exclusive to GigaOM: Over the next 12 months, T-Mobile USA will bolt thousands of new LTE antennas to its cell towers, utilizing a technique called 4X2 MIMO. It’s not LTE-Advanced, but it will create a faster and more resilient network.

Cell Tower and Osprey

T-Mobile USA has been talking some smack lately about how its brand-spanking-new LTE network gives it an edge over the competition. Being the last major U.S. carrier to launch LTE means T-Mobile is using the most up-to-date radio access gear and is thus better positioned to implement future LTE-Advanced techniques and other fancy next-generation network technologies.

T-Mobile, though, has been short on specifics, so far keeping mum on what particular tweaks it plans to make that will beat out its rivals. But talking to T-Mobile’s equipment vendors, GigaOM has learned some of those details of its network roadmap. The most impressive upgrade on its list is a plan to blanket its network with extra antennas in order to achieve significant performance gains.

speedometerThe smart antenna technique is called 4×2 MIMO (shorthand for Multiple Input-Multiple Output) and T-Mobile will be among the first if not the first global operator to implement it. Those of you familiar with 4G probably have already heard of 2X2 MIMO, which is used in all LTE networks today. It sends the same data transmission over parallel paths from two antennas at the tower, which are then picked up by two antennas at the receiver. 4X2 MIMO actually doubles the number of antennas — and thus the number of transmission paths — at the tower while the number of antennas in the device remains the same.

In English, that means there are a lot more signals flying at your smartphone, and there will be a lot more antennas at the tower to pick up your phone’s generally weaker return signals. That increases your chance of getting a decent link at the edge of a cell’s coverage zone where connection speeds tend to trail off. 4X2 MIMO won’t increase the maximum speed of the network beyond its 50-to 75-Mbps theoretical limits, but it will ensure that customers at the fringes of the network get much better connections.

How much better? Nokia Siemens Networks North American head of technology Petri Hautakangas said that in lab trials, T-Mobile and NSN are seeing speed gains at the cell edge as high as 100 percent on the uplink and anywhere from a 50 percent to 60 percent increase in downlink bandwidth. Simple geometry means overall network gains would be big (the further the distance from the tower the more space is covered). The end result is a big boost in the real-world capacity of the cell — it can support more simultaneous connections while making more of those connections faster and more resilient.

The best news is for T-Mobile’s accountants. Implementing 4X2 MIMO on T-Mobile’s network will require simple software upgrades to Ericsson and NSN’s base stations as well the installation and the mounting of new antennas on T-Mobile’s towers – many of which are already in place. Since 4X2 MIMO is already in the baseline LTE standard, most current generation handsets will automatically support the technique.

T-Mobile store logoAs for timing, Hautakangas had to be a little cagey when talking about a customer’s rollout plans. “I can say that in less than 12 months we’ll have a commercial 4X2 MIMO network rolled out with a major U.S. operator,” he said during an interview. NSN has only one Tier 1 radio infrastructure customer in the U.S., and that’s T-Mobile.

I talked to T-Mobile VP of radio network engineering Mark McDiarmid, and while he wouldn’t discuss the specifics of T-Mobile’s network blueprint, he did confirm that 4X2 MIMO was one of the multiple LTE and LTE-Advanced technologies T-Mobile was considering for future use.

“We have a very good handle on what 4X2 MIMO can do for us,” McDiarmid said. “And we’re one of the few that are in a position to use it.”

As for other technologies on T-Mobile’s roadmap, both Ericsson and NSN confirmed that their network gear will support the eventual upgrade to carrier aggregation, the first of a long list of LTE-Advanced techniques (though it’s still a far cry from being LTE-Advanced ready as T-Mobile likes to claim).

Carrier aggregation bonds two disparate LTE bands together creating a super-fast connection. T-Mobile already uses carrier aggregation in its HSPA+ network, which is how it achieves 42 Mbps speeds over what is technically a 3G network.

Again McDiarmid wouldn’t comment on T-Mobile’s specific plans, but he said T-Mobile is weighing the use carrier aggregation in two ways. First, it could glue together different parts of its current LTE network in the Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) band, giving it bigger channels in markets where it doesn’t have contiguous spectrum. Second, when it launches LTE in the PCS band, it could bind together two completely separate frequency bands, creating the mother of all mobile broadband connections.

T-Mobile image courtesy of Flickr user swruler9284

  1. Whatever they’re doing, it’s working… They switched on LTE in a HUGE chunk of Southern California today and YEOWEE is it quick… 28-32 mb down, 14-17 up… FASTER than my current in-house WiFi !!! Yeah baby !!!

    1. And the best part? You can use as much of that LTE as you want.

      1. Up to 5GB for the “fast unlimited plan”, which includes no tethering.

        Personally, I prefer the 2.5GB plan which allows me to tether and costs $10/mo less.

        TMO’s LTE is good where I get it – some coverage in SJ, and otherwise the 4G is not noticably bad (like 3G was for VZ and ATT on my older iPhone).

        You can’t beat TMO’s family pricing however, it’s hella cheap and seems to work really well.

        1. No completely unlimited actually.

    2. Verizon is southern cali is faster than that and has vastly better coverage.

      1. My buddies doesn’t pull those speeds… Definitely not consistently.

  2. I tell ya, I’m not sure what they did but it sure seems to be working !! They switched LTE on over a big chuck of Southern California today and yikes is it quick… 28-32 mb down and 17-22 mb up.. YEEHA !!! That beats anything I’ve seen ANYWHERE.

  3. Ask T-Mobile
    When I’ll have better connexion than 2G in Hermiston, Oregon?

    1. Kevin Fitchard CJG Wednesday, June 5, 2013

      Hi CJC, you’ll probably have to ask T-Mobile that yourself. It would be a good idea to pester them though. You’d be surprised how much customer feedback influences network upgrade decisions. Squeaky wheel.

      In general, though, that’s been the big knock on T-Mo, it’s limited coverage outside of the major metro areas.

      1. Thy have issues IN major metro areas as well. i wish they were more competitive but as someone who travels a lot i can’t use T-Mobile.

    2. Move out of the boondocks?

      But in all seriousness – Kevin’s right. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.

      1. No one ever says I’m right, Ben. Don’t you know the GigaOM comment rules :)

    3. never heard of Hermiston, Oregon… perhaps tmobile hasnt either

  4. Question: have their been any rumors about T-Mobile implementing SRVCC in the future?

    Also, this is fantastic news. Once I have an LTE device I’ll be even happier.

    1. Hi Alex,

      From all of my conversations with T-Mobile, they’ve minimized VoLTE. Neville Ray said they would maintain Metro’s VoIP service over its LTE networks, but as you know, those LTE networks aren’t long for this world. http://gigaom.com/2012/10/11/t-mobile-will-maintain-metropcss-volte-service-but-its-future-is-up-in-the-air/

      So in answer to your question, I don’t think SRVCC is a very high priority for them.

  5. anil bhandari Wednesday, June 5, 2013

    Hi Kevin… Informative article. However, It is surprising to note that T-Mobile’s initial network rollout was not with 4×2 MIMO. It makes sense for AT&T and Verizon to have rolled out networks with 2×2 MIMO as they operate in 700MHz that has very robust propagation characteristics. However, T-Mobile operates at much higher frequencies in AWS band and for them to have a decent in-building coverage 4×2 MIMO was a MUST. Am I missing something here?

    1. Hi Anil,

      Thanks for the feedback. As for 4X2, I see your point about how T-Mo would need this more than others, but I just don’t think the technology has been available until now. 4X2 is in the Rel. 8 standard but there are lot of things in Rel. 8 and Rel. 9 that still aren’t supported in today’s LTE networks.

      1. Thanks Kevin for sharing further information.

  6. I have the blue galaxy s3 for T-Mobile I got it a week in a half ago is lte I got it from walmart

  7. I just signed up with t_mobile last night and went with the iPhone5. I still have an iPhone4 running on Att’s network through StraighTalk. In my home Zipcode, T-mobile is amazingly fast… faster than my wifi home connection through V.FIOS. My work though is a few zipcodes above me and coverage looks like it gets slower up there. I have 13 more days to test drive the service and make a decision. As long as I can make calls without drops I can deal with slower data rates because most customers have wifi and most are comfortable with letting me use it.

    Just a question about the potential upgrades and what it might mean. If they upgrade the towers north of me would that ultimately mean that their coverage area could increase without the addition of new towers.. ? That is what I am getting from reading this article.

  8. Kevin Fitchard Wednesday, June 19, 2013

    Hi John,

    I can’t speak to your specific situation without knowing more details, but if I were to guess, it sounds like your house is sitting pretty close to a tower that has either T-Mo’s HSPA+ 42 network or LTE network (which would explain why you’re seeing speeds faster than Wi-Fi). It doesn’t mean that the towers north of you don’t have the same network. It could just mean that you’re further away from them in your commute or that there are far more people accessing them at the same time congesting the network.

    Ultimately this 4X2 technology is going to help by making long-distance links more resilient, but there’s no way this technology is going to go live in 14 days, and chances are your iPhone 5 won’t be able to support it unless Apple can perform a firmware upgrade.

Comments have been disabled for this post