12 Comments

Summary:

Salesforce is trying hard and spending large to diversify from its CRM base. Today it announced plans to buy Exact Target for $2.5 billion on top of about $1.5 billion it spent on companies such as Heroku, Radian6 and Buddy Media.

Salesforce, the San Francisco-based company that started out as a customer relationship management (CRM) business is continuing its transformation into a cloud application layer company and to that end, it plans to acquire Indianapolis-based ExactTarget, a marketing platform, for approximately $2.5 billion or about $33.75 per share, in cash.

The deal would increase Salesforce’s revenue by $120 million to $125 million in the financial year 2014. Revenue for the company’s full fiscal year 2014 is projected to be in the range of $3.955 to $4.0 billion, an increase of 30 percent to 31 percent year-over-year. The non-GAAP earnings per share will drop to about 16 cents a share for the year. Diluted non-GAAP EPS is expected to be in the range of $0.31 to $0.33. The board of directors of both companies have approved the transaction. The transaction is expected to close late in salesforce.com’s fiscal second quarter, ending July 31, 2013.

Make no mistake — this is one expensive deal. In 2012, Exact Target had revenues of $292.3 million (up 41 percent from 2011) and a net loss of $21 million (down from $35 million in 2011.) Exact Target expects to bring in $370.0 million to $374.0 million during 2013 and lose between $20-to-$22 million.

An Expensive Makeover

Salesforce’s makeover is getting more expensive. It paid about $142 million for Jigsaw in April, 2010. Salesforce paid $212 million for Heroku later that year and shelled out $326 million for Radian6 in 2011 only to open its wallet to spend another $689 million for Buddy Media last year.

But this one is the big whopper and actually the one that makes the most sense for Salesforce, especially from the perspective of goosing up its revenues. However, this shouldn’t come as a surprise mostly because the company had promised to make more “marketing cloud” oriented acquisitions. Of course, raising over a billion in debt last quarter was even more of a hint of things to come.

“The CMO is expected to spend more on technology than the CIO by 2017,” said Marc Benioff, chairman and CEO, salesforce.com. “The addition of ExactTarget makes Salesforce the starting place for every company and puts salesforce.com in the pole position to capture this opportunity.”

Net:Work 2010: Marc Benioff – CEO, salesforce.com

Net:Work 2010: Marc Benioff – CEO, salesforce.com

Exact Target, to put it crudely, is an email-based marketing platform, one whose usage has been on an upswing as consumer brands have turned to the internet for the marketing efforts. ExactTarget has big-name customers including folks like Coca-Cola. It also adds more structure to Salesforce’s ambiguous sounding marketing cloud.

Acquisition and date Amount
Sendia, April 2006 $15,000,000
Kieden, Aug. 2006 undisclosed
Kenlet, Jan. 2007 undisclosed
Koral, March 2007 undisclosed
Instranet, Aug. 2008 $31,500,000
GroupSwim, Dec. 2009 undisclosed
Informavores, Dec. 2009 undisclosed
Jigsaw Data Corp., April 2010 $142,000,000
Sitemasher, June 2010 undisclosed
Activa Live Chat, Sept. 2010 undisclosed
Heroku, Dec. 2010 $250,000,000
Etacts, Dec. 2010 undisclosed
Dimdim, Jan, 2011 $31,000,000
Manymoon, Feb. 2011 undisclosed
Radian6, March 2011 $340,000,000
Navajo Security, Aug. 2011 undisclosed
Assistly, Sept. 2011 $50,000,000
Model Metrics, Nov. 2011 undisclosed
Rypple, Dec. 2011 undisclosed
Stypi, May 2012 undisclosed
Buddy Media, May 2012 $689,000,000
ChoicePass, June 2012 undisclosed
Thinkfuse, June 2012 undisclosed
GoInstant, July 2012 $70,000,000
Clipboard, May 2013 $12,000,000
ExactTarget, June 2013 $2,500,000,000

On paper, all of CEO Benioff’s moves make sense. Cloud infrastructure is the future of software. Social is a core and vital need for companies and marketing is becoming crucial and strategic necessity in our increasingly distraction-infested world. Bringing it all together with mobile — another area of focus for Salesforce — makes perfect sense. It is a good strategy to take especially as some of the older (software) guard starts to slip. Exact Target brings in enough muscle into the company to go toe-to-toe with Oracle which acquired RightNow, Eloqua and Vitrue.

Will it work?

The question is whether Salesforce actually make all these disparate pieces start to work together and make a gourmet dish called profits from all these ingredients. Many on Wall Street are skeptical, though some of it is because of Benioff’s bombastic “I am always right” style.

The doubters have a reason: the marketing cloud, which until recently was only Radian6 and Buddy Media, only was about 3 percent of company’s revenue — around $100 million. The other businesses, such as Data.com — which consists of the 2010 Jigsaw acquisition – are said to bring in about a $100 million. It isn’t clear how much (or how little) the company makes from Heroku and then there is Work.com, its new business that is an amalgamation of Rypple, Choicepass and other assets. Those are rounding errors for a company that is going to bring in $4 billion this year.

That said, for now, Benioff has enough to standup in front of the world and promise what a friend of mine calls “future bliss.”

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. With the PC we had the equivalent of MYOS(Make Your Own SW) the Spreadsheet. So far mobile seems to be focused, in companies, on BYOD. The HW site of the picture. So companies seem to bolt it on, but with mobile comes context which is about SW. None of the established players seem to reckon it. Guess that means I’m skeptical, specially with more email folders and autonomous systems as an example.

  2. Peter Mullen Tuesday, June 4, 2013

    In typical Larry Ellison fashion, Salesforce starting to look a lot like Oracle.

    1. Lol, yes Peter you are right about that.

  3. Interesting acquisition.. The test of the acquisition would depend on how fast SFDC can convert the non SFDC accounts in ET to SFDC.. I thought ET had lost steam in recent years..

  4. David Rosendahl Tuesday, June 4, 2013

    Om,

    What are your thoughts relative to what this does to SF’s AppExchange partners?

    Won’t some perceive this as making SF competitive, especially as it relates to email and marketing automation?

    1. David

      I think this is something Salesforce can offer as an underlying cloud service to their AppExchange partners. And on a more drastic note – if Facebook can get rid of Zynga….

  5. Om,

    I am actually surprised at this acquisition. I think the market overreacted, but why wouldn’t SF be focused on getting a marketing automation solution like Hubspot/Marketo instead? That seems like a faster growing segment.

    I also think that Salesforce should be more focused on upgrading its aging UI rather than acquisitions. Benioff is focused on growth by acquisition, rather than improving its core business.

  6. $2.5B….really? Losing money – I understand rev multiples, but wow. Also – did you see the share distributions? Love how the top execs names were mostly the VCs who personally got themselves into the deal. Make money for their fund, make money personally – and some of the original founders are diluted to less than 1%. Wow – not fair.

  7. Not a very impressive move, considering how late it’s coming. Large companies like Salesforce should have been caught up in the automation movement much earlier. This acquistion, however, goes on to prove how important automation is to any CRM system. Small companies are slowly catching up too. CRM products like Agile CRM offer email and marketing automation on top of the CRM system itself, for small and medium sized businesses.

    The advantageous part for Salesforce of course, is the features provided by not only ExactTarget itself, but also by Pardot and iGoDigital(which will greatly help BuddyMedia, I’m sure). Expect to see a great profit for Salesforce next quarter.

  8. CRM 8 times revenue for a guy to buy companies and duct tape them together.

    I cannot believe any expert would say this guy is great.

    Not only is he just buying companies, he is over paying for the companies 50% premium. Wow

    This stock will be 2 times rev soon.

  9. Om,

    Very nice piece. It just feels like a overpayment. I’d also be concerned about the post acquisition integration skill set (as you state in your profits point). Google and Oracle seem to be fist class at integrating acquisitions. But as we’ve seen with HP and many many others, the acquisition route is a graveyard of shareholder value decline.

    Best

    Ian

    1. Ian

      It seems like Salesforce has a better track record than most but not everything is/does go according to plan. I find this deal expensive too, but it makes more sense than some of the other deals they have done. I do agree – so many acquisitions should give everyone a reason to pause.

Comments have been disabled for this post