<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMC is just not that into SoftLayer, but IBM may be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/#comment-1321732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=621211#comment-1321732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Softlayer is technically not a cloud provider in the least. Their model is not pure cloud but self-managed virtualized infrastructure. There is a reason that they have been independent for nearly 10 years................]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Softlayer is technically not a cloud provider in the least. Their model is not pure cloud but self-managed virtualized infrastructure. There is a reason that they have been independent for nearly 10 years&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarkdony</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/#comment-1321409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clarkdony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=621211#comment-1321409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware&#039;s new cloud needs DC, The new Pivotal Initiative&#039;s cloud needs DC, so why not EMC just buy it and lease some resource to VMware &amp; PI? 
I think VMware&#039;s IaaS announcement doesn&#039;t mean it automatically has the DC resource.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware&#8217;s new cloud needs DC, The new Pivotal Initiative&#8217;s cloud needs DC, so why not EMC just buy it and lease some resource to VMware &amp; PI?<br />
I think VMware&#8217;s IaaS announcement doesn&#8217;t mean it automatically has the DC resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb Darrow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/#comment-1320791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barb Darrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 03:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=621211#comment-1320791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you are correct-- SoftLayer is a supporting organization in the foundation... IBM and Rackspace are higher level Platinum members. Will correct the mention. thanks for your note. You&#039;re right, as the story says, Rackspace would be a lot more expensive. Look forward to seeing what if anything happens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are correct&#8211; SoftLayer is a supporting organization in the foundation&#8230; IBM and Rackspace are higher level Platinum members. Will correct the mention. thanks for your note. You&#8217;re right, as the story says, Rackspace would be a lot more expensive. Look forward to seeing what if anything happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhesr</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/#comment-1320777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jhesr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 02:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=621211#comment-1320777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why can&#039;t IBM just build its&#039; own?

HP built their own public cloud in just one year and on a feature basis it seems to have parity with RackSpace. 

HP did a really great job catching up so quickly. Pretty amazing when you think about it.

You can take a look at it here: www.hpcloud.com

I don&#039;t buy it when the anonymous insider says that IBM can&#039;t create their own stuff. How about Watson (AI computer that beat the best people in the world at Jeopardy)? That seems like a pretty incredible invention to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t IBM just build its&#8217; own?</p>
<p>HP built their own public cloud in just one year and on a feature basis it seems to have parity with RackSpace. </p>
<p>HP did a really great job catching up so quickly. Pretty amazing when you think about it.</p>
<p>You can take a look at it here: <a href="http://www.hpcloud.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hpcloud.com</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy it when the anonymous insider says that IBM can&#8217;t create their own stuff. How about Watson (AI computer that beat the best people in the world at Jeopardy)? That seems like a pretty incredible invention to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie Wright</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/#comment-1320771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=621211#comment-1320771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SoftLayer actually is an OpenStack member (http://www.openstack.org/foundation/companies/). It seems they&#039;ve at least implemented OpenStack Swift (Object Storage), so they could be more aligned with IBM than you think. Rackspace is a great company, but is probably to expensive for IBM. My money is on an IBM acquisition of SoftLayer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SoftLayer actually is an OpenStack member (<a href="http://www.openstack.org/foundation/companies/" rel="nofollow">http://www.openstack.org/foundation/companies/</a>). It seems they&#8217;ve at least implemented OpenStack Swift (Object Storage), so they could be more aligned with IBM than you think. Rackspace is a great company, but is probably to expensive for IBM. My money is on an IBM acquisition of SoftLayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazuya Mishima</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/emc-is-just-not-that-into-softlayer-but-ibm-may-be/#comment-1320522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazuya Mishima]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=621211#comment-1320522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EMC is not in the race for SoftLayer, the cloud services provider, but IBM is on the prowl for cloud expertise and has looked at both SoftLayer and Rackspace, sohttp://bit.ly/10Ro1MKurces say....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMC is not in the race for SoftLayer, the cloud services provider, but IBM is on the prowl for cloud expertise and has looked at both SoftLayer and Rackspace, sohttp://bit.ly/10Ro1MKurces say&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
