Comments on: CERN: We’re sure this is a Higgs boson, but we’re not sure which one it is http://gigaom.com/2013/03/14/cern-were-sure-this-is-a-higgs-boson-but-were-not-sure-which-one-it-is/ Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:55:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Babu G. Ranganathan http://gigaom.com/2013/03/14/cern-were-sure-this-is-a-higgs-boson-but-were-not-sure-which-one-it-is/#comment-1320497 Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:01:14 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=620427#comment-1320497 DOES ‘GOD PARTICLE’ EXPLAIN UNIVERSE’S ORIGIN? Just google the title to access this popular Internet article of mine. The Higgs boson does not create mass from nothing. What it does is convert energy into mass. The universe had a beginning. It is not eternal and cannot be eternal because science has shown that the universe does not have the ability to have sustained itself eternally.

All scientists now believe that the universe (time, space, and matter) came from nothing. Atheistic scientists believe that the universe came from nothing by some natural process that has yet to be discovered. This belief contradicts the first law of thermodynamics in science. Read my Internet article to learn more.

Babu G. Ranganathan*

(B.A. Bible/Biology)

Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM
GREEK ROOTS

*I have given successful lectures (with question and answer period afterwards)
defending creation before evolutionist science faculty and students at various
colleges and universities. I’ve been privileged to be recognized in the 24th
edition of Marquis “Who’s Who in The East” for my writings on
religion and science.

]]> By: The Crestroyer Theory http://gigaom.com/2013/03/14/cern-were-sure-this-is-a-higgs-boson-but-were-not-sure-which-one-it-is/#comment-1320353 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:06:51 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=620427#comment-1320353 The bottom line still is that we don’t really know whether Higgs explains mass. I find it interesting that we don’t get any statistical facts about the probabilities of it being the Higgs according to the standard model. I am sure somebody has these stats, but I have not seen any yet, at least. Not even in the official press release from CERN.

My take on physics is controversial. I don’t think that particles exists. I think that the universe is close to infinite standing waves, where the end point of each wave is the core of the atom.

Quantum mechanics might not be confusing at all. If you split the entire universe into the physical universe (energy) and infinite separate mental parallel universes (opposite energy), the wave collapse might be explainable as where all the universes meet. They collapse in the orbit of the electron. The photons transferring energy between these orbits of electrons is what we as observers perceive as reality.

Se more at http://www.crestroy.com

]]>