<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New  AppDynamics release aims to fix, not just find, application problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/03/11/new-appdynamics-release-aims-to-fix-not-just-find-application-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/11/new-appdynamics-release-aims-to-fix-not-just-find-application-problems/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Louth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/11/new-appdynamics-release-aims-to-fix-not-just-find-application-problems/#comment-1319148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Louth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=619004#comment-1319148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like AppDynamics is taken a leaf out of dynaTrace&#039;s book and simply copying our previous feature set as their vision for the &quot;next generation&quot; thingy.

http://www.jinspired.com/site/jxinsight-opencore-6-4

&quot;Whilst many companies today are increasing the time and expense spent in collecting, storing and analyzing application performance monitoring data the results viewed in terms of improved availability and reliability are invariably disappointing because monitoring is not management. To actually manage applications, operations need to go beyond passively watching an application crash as it uncontrollably (and with little regard for its safety) reaches and exceeds internal and external resource limits and barriers. Today sadly the most commonly practiced operation performed by management staff tasked with resolving a troubled or failing application instance is to kill and restart the runtime.

With JXInsight/OpenCore 6.4 we are offering three powerful metering extensions based on our adaptive control valve technology that dynamically optimize the performance of an application in terms of throughput and response as well as safe guarding its execution from exceeding limits it is not fully aware of but that can be sensed via past, present and predicted activity metering.

Adaptive control builds on and compliments our earlier ground breaking work in bringing many Quality of Service (QoS) technologies and techniques used in networking up into the application runtime.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like AppDynamics is taken a leaf out of dynaTrace&#8217;s book and simply copying our previous feature set as their vision for the &#8220;next generation&#8221; thingy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jinspired.com/site/jxinsight-opencore-6-4" rel="nofollow">http://www.jinspired.com/site/jxinsight-opencore-6-4</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Whilst many companies today are increasing the time and expense spent in collecting, storing and analyzing application performance monitoring data the results viewed in terms of improved availability and reliability are invariably disappointing because monitoring is not management. To actually manage applications, operations need to go beyond passively watching an application crash as it uncontrollably (and with little regard for its safety) reaches and exceeds internal and external resource limits and barriers. Today sadly the most commonly practiced operation performed by management staff tasked with resolving a troubled or failing application instance is to kill and restart the runtime.</p>
<p>With JXInsight/OpenCore 6.4 we are offering three powerful metering extensions based on our adaptive control valve technology that dynamically optimize the performance of an application in terms of throughput and response as well as safe guarding its execution from exceeding limits it is not fully aware of but that can be sensed via past, present and predicted activity metering.</p>
<p>Adaptive control builds on and compliments our earlier ground breaking work in bringing many Quality of Service (QoS) technologies and techniques used in networking up into the application runtime.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mytton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/11/new-appdynamics-release-aims-to-fix-not-just-find-application-problems/#comment-1319061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Mytton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=619004#comment-1319061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Bansal is saying the only difference between AppDynamics and New Relic is their target market then he&#039;s either bluffing or wrong. The route to the enterprise is through engineers - this is the open source model and has been proven most recently by the likes of 10gen with MongoDB. New Relic are playing the same game but with SaaS: target developers and engineers, get deployment and then use a more traditional inside sales model to get the deals done. 

New Relic&#039;s outward marketing looks very startup/small business orientated but if you know anything about the market or what they&#039;re doing (and I think Bansal probably does), then it&#039;s clear they&#039;re hitting the enterprise market pretty hard. And doing quite well too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bansal is saying the only difference between AppDynamics and New Relic is their target market then he&#8217;s either bluffing or wrong. The route to the enterprise is through engineers &#8211; this is the open source model and has been proven most recently by the likes of 10gen with MongoDB. New Relic are playing the same game but with SaaS: target developers and engineers, get deployment and then use a more traditional inside sales model to get the deals done. </p>
<p>New Relic&#8217;s outward marketing looks very startup/small business orientated but if you know anything about the market or what they&#8217;re doing (and I think Bansal probably does), then it&#8217;s clear they&#8217;re hitting the enterprise market pretty hard. And doing quite well too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
