17 Comments

Summary:

When you look at the ownership trends among tablets, and particularly iPads, it starts to become rather puzzling that there aren’t as many photo apps made specifically for the iPad.

Mayfair screenshot Instagram

Last night, I published my 400th photo on Instagram — and it got me thinking about how I use this indispensable app. In the year and half I’ve been using the service, that amounts to about about five pictures posted per week. But my posting pales in comparison to how often I use the app: every morning I check my feed, many times throughout the day, and definitely before I go to bed at night. Much of that browsing, especially in the evening, is done on my iPad — despite the fact that Instagram still does not have a tablet-optimized iPad app. Yes, even one of the most popular iOS apps of all time still requires you to click the “2x” button on your iPad.

How can this be? It’s certainly easy to write it off as the fact that people take photos with their smartphones, not their tablets. But one of the best parts of Instagram, and I know this is the case not just for me, is browsing the images that your friends are posting. (Why else would people get so upset when Instagram removed the ability to view its photos within the body of a tweet?) Just like far more people lurk on Twitter than post, far more people browse Instagram than post images.

And yet Instagram isn’t alone. There are far more popular photo apps of all kinds — camera apps, photo editing apps, photo book apps — for smartphones than tablets. In a study published this week, Suite 48 Analytics found that of the top 25 most downloaded free iOS photo apps, only six were optimized for the iPad. And of paid photo apps, in the top 25 there are just seven made specifically for the iPad; Photoshop Touch and Camera+ for iPad are highest rated. Similar information on Google apps wasn’t available because Google Play does not designate apps by device.

iPad photo apps Suite 48

A missed opportunity for developers

When you look at the ownership trends among tablets, and particularly iPads, it starts to become rather puzzling that there aren’t as many photo apps made specifically for the iPad. The Suite 48 Analytics study noted:

  • Tablet purchases are growing 75 percent year-over-year right now.
  • One in four American adults have a tablet. (Most of those are iPads.)
  • The average age of tablet users is 34, compared to the average age of smartphone users, which is 30. In general, older users are more likely to have kids. And as we all know from our Facebook or Instagram feeds, they like pictures of their kids.
  • Tablet users are more likely to pay for things than smartphone users: 62 percent of tablet users have bought something on it in the past year, versus 52 percent of smartphone users.

These are important opportunities for third-party developers who are building apps, said Hans Hartman, who published the Suite 48 report. Older users tend to have more disposable income and are willing to pay for these apps — provided they’re good of course. He noted that even though Adobe charges $9.99 for Photoshop Touch for iPad, which is a lot of money for a mobile app, users still praise the price in their reviews because they understand the value of being able to edit their photos by hand on their tablet instead of a laptop or desktop, especially considering what they’d pay for similar software on the desktop.

Adobe Photoshop Touch iPad

Adobe Photoshop Touch iPad

And even if developers prefer to offer their app for free, in-app purchases of photo products are a great way to monetize those apps. Tablets are easier for, say, building photo books for a new baby than a smaller smartphone screen, and more convenient than a computer. And, again, the data shows that the same older demographic that has kids and owns tablets is willing to pay for this kind of product.

It doesn’t have to be just about revenue though: a bigger screen often means more freedom for designers. A better layout or interface can allow for features a smaller iPhone or smartphone screen may not. And an app can be easier to use on a larger display. “On iPhone, it’s primarily a portrait way of looking at your phone,” he said. Instead of landscape, which “can make an app better,” Hartman pointed out in a phone interview.

Universal apps — apps that work for both the iPhone and the iPad — can work. But for Instagram in particular there is clearly a lost opportunity here: the downloads of InstaPad, which is not an Instagram product, prove it. People (like me) clearly want an app that sounds like it’s the Instagram for iPad.

So why not give us what we want: the real thing? Now that Instagram has Facebook money to play with, there’s not much of an excuse.

  1. Respectively, Instagram is used as a sharing platform for pictures. Anyone who takes pictures with their iPad is just asking to be mocked at. You look silly taking a picture with a 7 or 10″ tablet. There’s no way you *can’t* look dumb taking a picture with a tablet. Instagram is only on phones for that reason alone. Navigating to instagram.com performs all the necessary features required for use of instagram on a tablet.

    Share
    1. If the web is good enough for users, then a lot of apps have no reason for existing on the iPad.

      Share
    2. Thibaut Davoult Friday, March 8, 2013

      I agree that no one would (or should, rather) use an iPad over an iPhone to take a photo, but I think Erica is right in saying people could use an Instagram iPad app for an enhanced browsing experience alone. I didn’t know of InstaPad but it clearly shows a will for people to make their content discovery on Instagram easier from their iPad.

      Share
    3. Respectively, you’re and idiot. If Instagram is a SHARING platform, what is the entire reason for the sharing??? So other users can VIEW the shared photos. So just as much as Instagram is for sharing, viewing the pictures is equally important, and native applications still beat their website equivalents.

      Share
      1. Any photo worth viewing on a phone is worth even more when viewed on an iPad.

        Share
    4. Liam Templeton Friday, May 3, 2013

      What if the camera on my iPad mini is better than the one on my iPhone 3GS? You can’t limit an app demographic just because the user would look silly. Similarly, editing and browsing in the app would be much more compatible with a larger screen in full resolution.

      Share
    5. killacelebrity Sunday, May 26, 2013

      I would rather potentially look dumb taking a photo with my tablet when I see something cool because I want to share & capture it rather than write #nonsense like Will Killian & prove to the world that I am dumb LOL #moron

      Share
  2. I agree with the sentiment, but the blogosphere bait answer is OMG FRAGMENTATION.

    At certain points, the distinction between tablet and phone is irrelevant. Both device classes have cameras, and even 3G. iOS sees the need to differentiate and cripple the experience on my iPad. On Android, the apps are ugly, but they fill the screen, and you get the regular keyboard.

    Share
  3. Indispensable? Seriously Erica?

    Share
  4. Instagram is optimized for fast image sharing at the expense of image resolution. In order to achieve fast upload speeds, Instagram photos are heavily optimized for phone display sizes. They don’t look as good on the iPad. None of the apps you list for the iPad do what Instagram does to optimize for *fast* image sharing.

    Share
    1. This is precisely it: instagram’s resolution is 600 x 600 px, which would look like crap on a retina display tablet. It’s not just an app. They’d have to change the whole infrastructure to have a good looking product.

      Share
  5. Jochen Moelle Friday, March 8, 2013

    People would use tablets for quality photo editing, collage creations, photo books, calendars etc. a lot more if developers could give them a reason to spend quality time on it. Just posting results on a social site doesn’t match the higher level of ease and creativity that a tablet can provide.
    Kodak has just announced an API for developers that enables them to add global retail printing to their apps motivated by an interesting revenue opportunity on top – see kodakdeveloper.com
    Now, this is something that should motivate devs to adapt their photo apps to the tablet form factor. The value of a tangible result totally matches the creative options on the bigger screen and the comfort of your couch.

    Share
  6. No need. Just jailbreak your iPad, and use RetinaPad. Then basically all iPhone apps become retina.

    Share
  7. Actually, Whip from ArcSoft is a social photo album for the iPad. http://www.whiptheapp.com/ios/. You can upload up to 24 photos, create a photo album almost instantly and then share with the Whip community (via WhipStream) or via Facebook or email. Whip also allows you to follow other Whips you like or comment on them.

    Share
  8. The ipad has a camera on the back. It was made to take pictures.

    Share
  9. Cristian Castillo Saturday, April 6, 2013

    We’ve been working for months to solve this problem, you can see our first approach here http://likeit.co/ it’s a great way to experience Instagram on the iPad.

    Share
  10. Sorry but it’s terrible on my iPad2. Tablets are much better tools for editing or even posting photos and even if the photos would have low resolution due to Instagram’s design, it would a much better experience all in all.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post