<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google tipped off EU authorities over Microsoft&#8217;s $732M browser boo-boo, report claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dnqxote</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dnqxote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking forward to a similar option screen in Android going ahead..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to a similar option screen in Android going ahead..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flamencoguy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flamencoguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[scroogled back fired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scroogled back fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auntie Edna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Auntie Edna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to break the news, but the people who tipped off Google are closer to home than you think. This is how I knew this fine was coming in March, before it hit the news:

http://betanews.com/2013/02/26/bloody-well-time-microsoft-releases-internet-explorer-10-for-windows-7/#comment-813112790 .

It was no &quot;glitch&quot;, incidentally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to break the news, but the people who tipped off Google are closer to home than you think. This is how I knew this fine was coming in March, before it hit the news:</p>
<p><a href="http://betanews.com/2013/02/26/bloody-well-time-microsoft-releases-internet-explorer-10-for-windows-7/#comment-813112790" rel="nofollow">http://betanews.com/2013/02/26/bloody-well-time-microsoft-releases-internet-explorer-10-for-windows-7/#comment-813112790</a> .</p>
<p>It was no &#8220;glitch&#8221;, incidentally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Meyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much for flagging that up. Fixed now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for flagging that up. Fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottwilkins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottwilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EU agreement only applied to Windows 7, not Win 7 SP1.  That&#039;s egg on Google face IMHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EU agreement only applied to Windows 7, not Win 7 SP1.  That&#8217;s egg on Google face IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garett Rogers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garett Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How long until Apple is accused of being a monopoly? Apple doesn’t give users the option of choosing the default browser on iPhone or iPad. That is worse than what Microsoft did to be deemed a Monopoly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long until Apple is accused of being a monopoly? Apple doesn’t give users the option of choosing the default browser on iPhone or iPad. That is worse than what Microsoft did to be deemed a Monopoly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakerome</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jakerome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it customary, in fact required, to include attribution information when posting photos are licensed CC-BY? People give away their photos for free, the least you can do is properly credit them. OBTW, it took less than a minute to trace the photographer.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/malczyk/5638599313/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it customary, in fact required, to include attribution information when posting photos are licensed CC-BY? People give away their photos for free, the least you can do is properly credit them. OBTW, it took less than a minute to trace the photographer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/malczyk/5638599313/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/malczyk/5638599313/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Higgins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Higgins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t a more appropriate lead photo be a Googlebeast eating the roadkill that is Microsoft?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a more appropriate lead photo be a Googlebeast eating the roadkill that is Microsoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Olson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point seems to be, not that anything said by the previous commenters is wrong, rather behind these justifiable steps is a strategic shift to increase hostilities. There is a lot at stake for Microsoft as it seems to be failing to gain traction outside of its historic areas of revenue. And a number of Google&#039;s business decisions seem to more directly threaten the profitability of competitors rather than directly contribute to their own profits. The thesis of the article seems well justified. I would like to hear more analysis of the art of war between Microsoft and Google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point seems to be, not that anything said by the previous commenters is wrong, rather behind these justifiable steps is a strategic shift to increase hostilities. There is a lot at stake for Microsoft as it seems to be failing to gain traction outside of its historic areas of revenue. And a number of Google&#8217;s business decisions seem to more directly threaten the profitability of competitors rather than directly contribute to their own profits. The thesis of the article seems well justified. I would like to hear more analysis of the art of war between Microsoft and Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fourthletter58</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/07/google-tipped-off-eu-authorities-over-microsofts-browser-boo-boo-report-claims/#comment-1318161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fourthletter58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617756#comment-1318161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An overall picture ? Where have you been for the past 15 years ? Microsoft have been waging a war against Google - Don&#039;t forget the inside MS joke - Bing - Because it&#039;s not Google!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An overall picture ? Where have you been for the past 15 years ? Microsoft have been waging a war against Google &#8211; Don&#8217;t forget the inside MS joke &#8211; Bing &#8211; Because it&#8217;s not Google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
