<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember the artificial leaf? Startup turns to making a flow battery instead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/03/06/remember-the-artificial-leaf-startup-turns-to-making-a-flow-battery-instead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/06/remember-the-artificial-leaf-startup-turns-to-making-a-flow-battery-instead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmm...</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/06/remember-the-artificial-leaf-startup-turns-to-making-a-flow-battery-instead/#comment-1318074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hmmm...]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 06:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=617361#comment-1318074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any battery that could fit 4-6 MWh in a 40&#039; container would be extremely impressive.  As in, a claim that should be treated with extreme skepticism.  Particularly for flow batteries which tend not to have the highest energy density.

Then again these folks got a bunch of credulous journalists to believe them on the artificial leaf thing, so what the heck, go outlandish or go home?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any battery that could fit 4-6 MWh in a 40&#8242; container would be extremely impressive.  As in, a claim that should be treated with extreme skepticism.  Particularly for flow batteries which tend not to have the highest energy density.</p>
<p>Then again these folks got a bunch of credulous journalists to believe them on the artificial leaf thing, so what the heck, go outlandish or go home?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
