<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebMD and Qualcomm Life team up to bring Quantified Self tech to the masses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/webmd-and-qualcomm-team-up-to-bring-quantified-self-tech-to-the-masses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/webmd-and-qualcomm-team-up-to-bring-quantified-self-tech-to-the-masses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakemalloy97</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/webmd-and-qualcomm-team-up-to-bring-quantified-self-tech-to-the-masses/#comment-1317693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jakemalloy97]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=616347#comment-1317693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Yishai - while regulation may have played some role you do not address the time / money / risk of WebMD trying to build out a complex software platform. WebMD is not a software company - they are a MEDIA company. They do not build software - and any &quot;apps&quot; they have launched are just a mobile skin on static often licensed content. 

So why would a company with no experience or expertise in software want to get into that now when instead they could approach a nascent company and hammer them into very favorable deal terms by simply lending credibility with their brand? THAT is the real no brainer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Yishai &#8211; while regulation may have played some role you do not address the time / money / risk of WebMD trying to build out a complex software platform. WebMD is not a software company &#8211; they are a MEDIA company. They do not build software &#8211; and any &#8220;apps&#8221; they have launched are just a mobile skin on static often licensed content. </p>
<p>So why would a company with no experience or expertise in software want to get into that now when instead they could approach a nascent company and hammer them into very favorable deal terms by simply lending credibility with their brand? THAT is the real no brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yishai Knobel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/webmd-and-qualcomm-team-up-to-bring-quantified-self-tech-to-the-masses/#comment-1317638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yishai Knobel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=616347#comment-1317638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qualcomm owes this deal to the FDA.  

WebMD had to pick whether they want to get patient data directly from self-monitoring devices via the WebMD smartphone apps, or from a remote cloud.

However, according to FDA regulation of Mobile Medical Apps,  the latter approach would turn the WebMD app into a regulated accessory, at least in the case of blood pressure cuffs and blood glucose monitors.  At the same time, the former approach would get WebMD the exact same data, but without becoming regulated, since the data comes from the cloud and not directly from the devices.

So between partnering with makers of smartphone-peripherals and getting regulated vs partnering with an data aggregator and dodging that bullet, the choice is easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qualcomm owes this deal to the FDA.  </p>
<p>WebMD had to pick whether they want to get patient data directly from self-monitoring devices via the WebMD smartphone apps, or from a remote cloud.</p>
<p>However, according to FDA regulation of Mobile Medical Apps,  the latter approach would turn the WebMD app into a regulated accessory, at least in the case of blood pressure cuffs and blood glucose monitors.  At the same time, the former approach would get WebMD the exact same data, but without becoming regulated, since the data comes from the cloud and not directly from the devices.</p>
<p>So between partnering with makers of smartphone-peripherals and getting regulated vs partnering with an data aggregator and dodging that bullet, the choice is easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/webmd-and-qualcomm-team-up-to-bring-quantified-self-tech-to-the-masses/#comment-1317604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Mackey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 06:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=616347#comment-1317604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is about time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is about time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
