<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ticking down to an iWatch debut: Reports say device to arrive this year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/ticking-down-to-an-iwatch-debut-reports-say-device-to-arrive-this-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/ticking-down-to-an-iwatch-debut-reports-say-device-to-arrive-this-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/ticking-down-to-an-iwatch-debut-reports-say-device-to-arrive-this-year/#comment-1317457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=616414#comment-1317457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read that you wouldn&#039;t make phone calls from your watch. It would only let you know when you received a call, and you would then use your phone for the conversation. This makes sense to me because (1) it would be pretty weird to be talking and listening to your watch, (2) looking at the battery life from an engineering viewpoint, I think the battery life of the watch would be pretty short if it had to deal with audio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that you wouldn&#8217;t make phone calls from your watch. It would only let you know when you received a call, and you would then use your phone for the conversation. This makes sense to me because (1) it would be pretty weird to be talking and listening to your watch, (2) looking at the battery life from an engineering viewpoint, I think the battery life of the watch would be pretty short if it had to deal with audio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Robinson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/03/04/ticking-down-to-an-iwatch-debut-reports-say-device-to-arrive-this-year/#comment-1317446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=616414#comment-1317446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;d be very interesting to see the public&#039;s reaction to this. It&#039;s Apple so I&#039;m sure it will do fine, but how will the consumers use it? And I&#039;m curious to see how making a phone call from your watch would work. I do agree though that I think its time for Apple to impress us all again with a new device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be very interesting to see the public&#8217;s reaction to this. It&#8217;s Apple so I&#8217;m sure it will do fine, but how will the consumers use it? And I&#8217;m curious to see how making a phone call from your watch would work. I do agree though that I think its time for Apple to impress us all again with a new device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
