http://gigaom.com/2013/03/01/apples-1b-samsung-verdict-slashed-some-products-to-get-new-trial/ Sun, 19 May 2013 08:29:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://gigaom.com/2013/03/01/apples-1b-samsung-verdict-slashed-some-products-to-get-new-trial/#comment-1317066 Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:50:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=616002#comment-1317066 Koh said the jury had incorrectly calculated part of the damages and that a new trial was needed to determine the actual, final dollar amount. That could end up less than or more than the original $450.5 million set by the jury.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2013/03/01/apples-1b-samsung-verdict-slashed-some-products-to-get-new-trial/#comment-1316998 Sat, 02 Mar 2013 02:15:02 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=616002#comment-1316998 Erica, it is my understanding that the infringements on the 14 devices is not remanded for re-trial, only the methods of calculating the cost of the infringements (primarily the start date of when assessment should begin). Is the wrong? Right?

]]> http://gigaom.com/2013/03/01/apples-1b-samsung-verdict-slashed-some-products-to-get-new-trial/#comment-1316982 Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:00:26 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=616002#comment-1316982 Are you sure about it ? Source of this news ?

]]> http://gigaom.com/2013/03/01/apples-1b-samsung-verdict-slashed-some-products-to-get-new-trial/#comment-1316968 Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:54:55 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=616002#comment-1316968 I think Bloomberg is misreporting this story. The real story is Apple gets a new trial for the $450 million!

]]>