<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who are the next hot mobile networking startups? Bessemer aims to find them at MWC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/22/who-are-the-next-hot-mobile-networking-startups-bessemer-aims-to-find-them-at-mwc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/22/who-are-the-next-hot-mobile-networking-startups-bessemer-aims-to-find-them-at-mwc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/22/who-are-the-next-hot-mobile-networking-startups-bessemer-aims-to-find-them-at-mwc/#comment-1315228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=613298#comment-1315228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post. I think that this will be a great step to start next mobile networking !
It will bring revolution in mobile networking.
Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post. I think that this will be a great step to start next mobile networking !<br />
It will bring revolution in mobile networking.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murari Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/22/who-are-the-next-hot-mobile-networking-startups-bessemer-aims-to-find-them-at-mwc/#comment-1315125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murari Srinivasan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=613298#comment-1315125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin, a minor correction - Qualcomm paid $805M for Flarion, not $600M. The additional $205M was a patent-related earnout:
http://www.informationweek.com/patents-raise-price-of-qualcomms-flarion/187200126]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, a minor correction &#8211; Qualcomm paid $805M for Flarion, not $600M. The additional $205M was a patent-related earnout:<br />
<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/patents-raise-price-of-qualcomms-flarion/187200126" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationweek.com/patents-raise-price-of-qualcomms-flarion/187200126</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
