<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm&#8217;s new radio chip gets us one step closer to a global 4G phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/qualcomms-new-radio-chip-gets-us-one-step-closer-to-a-global-4g-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/qualcomms-new-radio-chip-gets-us-one-step-closer-to-a-global-4g-phone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connected Dad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/qualcomms-new-radio-chip-gets-us-one-step-closer-to-a-global-4g-phone/#comment-1315519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connected Dad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=612816#comment-1315519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice move by Qualcomm to stay ahead of the pack of RF/modem suppliers and put front-end suppliers under pressure to consolidate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice move by Qualcomm to stay ahead of the pack of RF/modem suppliers and put front-end suppliers under pressure to consolidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/qualcomms-new-radio-chip-gets-us-one-step-closer-to-a-global-4g-phone/#comment-1314946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=612816#comment-1314946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Obforrent,

The RF module can support all three. It&#039;s just a question of whether vendors will build phones that will integrate all three.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Obforrent,</p>
<p>The RF module can support all three. It&#8217;s just a question of whether vendors will build phones that will integrate all three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/qualcomms-new-radio-chip-gets-us-one-step-closer-to-a-global-4g-phone/#comment-1314789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=612816#comment-1314789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for catching that, RobPaulGru. It&#039;s been corrected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for catching that, RobPaulGru. It&#8217;s been corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obforrent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/qualcomms-new-radio-chip-gets-us-one-step-closer-to-a-global-4g-phone/#comment-1314785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[obforrent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=612816#comment-1314785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[waht about interopperabilty in the A, B and C block in the lower 700MHz spectrum bands in the U.S. Will this new chip help the A Block licenses work with AT&amp;T B and C block licenses?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waht about interopperabilty in the A, B and C block in the lower 700MHz spectrum bands in the U.S. Will this new chip help the A Block licenses work with AT&amp;T B and C block licenses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobPaulGru</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/qualcomms-new-radio-chip-gets-us-one-step-closer-to-a-global-4g-phone/#comment-1314772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RobPaulGru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=612816#comment-1314772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would correct feasible to feasibly in the following sentence.

Other components in the RF chain such as the antenna will need to catch up before a device could feasible work on every LTE network in the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would correct feasible to feasibly in the following sentence.</p>
<p>Other components in the RF chain such as the antenna will need to catch up before a device could feasible work on every LTE network in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>